JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, May 8, 2025

Study: COVID booster effectiveness wanes but remains strong

by

1181 days ago
20220212
FILE - A woman receives a COVID-19 vaccine injection by a pharmacist at a clinic in Lawrence, Mass., on Wednesday, Dec. 29, 2021. One of the first studies to look at the performance of COVID-19 booster shots during the recent omicron wave of illnesses found a surprising decline in effectiveness after only four months. The findings are based on data from hospitals and urgent care centers in 10 states. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File)

FILE - A woman receives a COVID-19 vaccine injection by a pharmacist at a clinic in Lawrence, Mass., on Wednesday, Dec. 29, 2021. One of the first studies to look at the performance of COVID-19 booster shots during the recent omicron wave of illnesses found a surprising decline in effectiveness after only four months. The findings are based on data from hospitals and urgent care centers in 10 states. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File)

By MIKE STO­BBE-As­so­ci­at­ed Press

 

NEW YORK (AP) — An ear­ly look at the per­for­mance of COVID-19 boost­er shots dur­ing the re­cent omi­cron wave in the U.S. hint­ed at a de­cline in ef­fec­tive­ness, though the shots still of­fered strong pro­tec­tion against se­vere ill­ness.

The re­port, pub­lished by the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion on Fri­day, is con­sid­ered an ear­ly and lim­it­ed look at the dura­bil­i­ty of boost­er pro­tec­tion dur­ing the omi­cron surge that ex­plod­ed in De­cem­ber and Jan­u­ary but has been fad­ing in re­cent weeks.

“COVID-19 vac­cine boost­ers re­main safe and con­tin­ue to be high­ly ef­fec­tive against se­vere dis­ease over time,” said Kris­ten Nord­lund, a CDC spokesper­son.

The re­searchers looked at pa­tient vis­its to hos­pi­tals and ur­gent care cen­ters in 10 states. They es­ti­mat­ed how well Pfiz­er or Mod­er­na boost­er shots pre­vent­ed COVID-re­lat­ed vis­its to emer­gency de­part­ments and ur­gent care cen­ters, and how well the vac­cines pre­vent­ed hos­pi­tal­iza­tions.

About 10% of peo­ple in the study were boost­ed. Vac­cine ef­fec­tive­ness was high­er in peo­ple who had re­ceived boost­ers than in peo­ple who had re­ceived on­ly the orig­i­nal se­ries of shots.

But re­searchers al­so found that dur­ing the time that the omi­cron vari­ant has been pre­dom­i­nant, vac­cine ef­fec­tive­ness against out­pa­tient vis­its was 87% in peo­ple who had got­ten a boost­er two months ear­li­er, but to 66% at four months af­ter. Vac­cine ef­fec­tive­ness against hos­pi­tal­iza­tion fell from 91% at two months to 78% by the fourth month.

Those re­sults, how­ev­er, were based on on­ly a small num­ber of pa­tients — few­er than 200 — who had been boost­ed four months ear­li­er at the time of the omi­cron wave. And it’s un­clear if those peo­ple had got­ten boost­ers ear­ly for med­ical rea­sons that may have made them more vul­ner­a­ble to se­vere ill­ness.

Ef­fec­tive­ness af­ter a boost­er was high­er last year, when the delta vari­ant was caus­ing most U.S. cas­es, the study not­ed.

Health ex­perts ex­pect pro­tec­tion from the vac­cines to wane. The U.S. boost­er cam­paign was based on ev­i­dence that emerged last year that vac­cine pro­tec­tion was fad­ing six months af­ter peo­ple got their ini­tial vac­ci­na­tions.

And from the be­gin­ning, vac­cines have of­fered less pro­tec­tion against the omi­cron mu­tant than ear­li­er ver­sions of the virus. The study couldn’t ad­dress how pro­tec­tion will hold up against the next vari­ant to come along.

Still, the new study’s find­ing was no­table, said Dr. William Schaffn­er, a Van­der­bilt Uni­ver­si­ty vac­cines ex­pert.

“I’m a lit­tle sur­prised, ac­cord­ing to the da­ta, that it’s start­ing to wane al­ready,” he said, adding that he would have an­tic­i­pat­ed high­er es­ti­mates of vac­cine ef­fec­tive­ness at the four-month post-boost­er mark.

But Schaffn­er al­so said he’d like to see more re­search about the dura­bil­i­ty of boost­er pro­tec­tion, adding “let’s take this with a grain of salt.”

Dr. Michael Saag, an in­fec­tious dis­eases physi­cian at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Al­aba­ma at Birm­ing­ham, said 78% ef­fec­tive­ness against hos­pi­tal­iza­tion “is still pret­ty ef­fec­tive.”

“Anec­do­tal­ly, I’m see­ing very few peo­ple die who got boost­ed,” he said, even among those with weak­ened im­mune sys­tems. “The vac­cines are still work­ing.”

AP med­ical writer Lau­ran Neer­gaard in Wash­ing­ton con­tributed to this re­port.

 

COVID-19Covid Booster


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored