JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, August 23, 2025

Top economists call for return of managed flotation

by

Anthony Wilson
283 days ago
20241113

Con­sul­tant Busi­ness Ed­i­tor

an­tho­ny.wil­son@guardian.co.tt

Two of T&T’s most re­spect­ed econ­o­mists, for­mer min­is­ter of fi­nance Wen­dell Mot­t­ley and for­mer Cen­tral Bank gov­er­nor Eu­ric Bobb, are call­ing for a re­turn of the man­aged flota­tion of the TT dol­lar that was first in­tro­duced in April 1993.

They ar­gued that the man­aged flota­tion of the TT dol­lar “worked rea­son­ably well for over two decades, a pe­ri­od dur­ing which a re­mark­able in­dus­tri­al pol­i­cy saw T&T be­come a gas-based econ­o­my with a world-class pres­ence in the mar­kets for LNG, am­mo­nia, methanol, UAN, and melamine.”

Mot­t­ley served as T&T’s min­is­ter of fi­nance be­tween 1991 and 1995, dur­ing which he over­saw the flota­tion of the TT dol­lar. He re­ceived the Or­der of the Re­pub­lic of Trinidad and To­ba­go (ORTT), this coun­try’s high­est ho­n­our, on No­vem­ber 1, 2018.

Dr Eu­ric Bobb is a Cam­bridge-trained econ­o­mist who served as gov­er­nor of the Cen­tral Bank of T&T from 1984 to 1988. He re­ceived the Cha­co­nia Medal (gold), T&T’s sec­ond high­est ho­n­our, in 1994.

Last Fri­day, the In­ter­na­tion­al Mon­e­tary Fund is­sued a state­ment to Guardian Me­dia point­ing out that T&T’s for­eign ex­change re­stric­tions are in­con­sis­tent with the IMF’s Ar­ti­cles of Agree­ment.

In a news re­lease on Sun­day, Min­is­ter of Fi­nance, Colm Im­bert, said the Gov­ern­ment had main­tained T&T’s fixed ex­change rate to con­trol in­fla­tion, which he claimed is now al­most the low­est in the world.

In a joint­ly au­thored es­say, Mot­t­ley and Bobb not­ed that in re­cent months, ac­cess to for­eign ex­change (forex) has be­come a ma­jor is­sue of pub­lic con­cern: “Par­ents wor­ry about pay­ing fees for chil­dren study­ing over­seas; busi­ness­men are dis­tressed at the prospect of not be­ing able to pay for­eign sup­pli­ers in a time­ly man­ner; house­hold­ers want to buy goods on­line for which they have enough lo­cal cur­ren­cy (TTD).

“Both of us have been there be­fore in our pro­fes­sion­al lives, no­tably in 1977, 1983 and 1991, when there was sim­i­lar loud clam­our for the Gov­ern­ment ‘to do some­thing’.

“There­fore, we con­sid­er it use­ful to il­lu­mi­nate the on­go­ing dis­cus­sion by lay­ing out, in sim­ple fash­ion, some of the ba­sic facts about the sup­ply of and de­mand for forex.”

They point­ed out that as a small, open econ­o­my, T&T must im­port goods and ser­vices to meet a sig­nif­i­cant share, at least 50 per cent, of its ex­pen­di­ture for con­sump­tion and in­vest­ment. The buoy­an­cy of this de­mand is de­ter­mined by the over­all state of the econ­o­my, while its com­po­si­tion shifts de­pend­ing on the mix be­tween in­vest­ment and con­sump­tion and the chang­ing pref­er­ences of con­sumers.

Un­der to­day’s eco­nom­ic cir­cum­stances, de­mand for forex ex­ceeds sup­ply. There is no rea­son why sup­ply and de­mand should au­tonomous­ly bal­ance over any giv­en pe­ri­od. Hence, mech­a­nisms are need­ed to al­lo­cate the sup­ply of for­eign ex­change among com­pet­ing de­mands.

The econ­o­mists point­ed out that in April 1993, T&T’s bu­reau­crat­ic sys­tem for the al­lo­ca­tion of for­eign ex­change, which was in force since 1942, was re­placed by a mar­ket-based sys­tem.

They said the ma­jor el­e­ments of the re­form were:

The ex­change rate would be de­ter­mined un­der a man­aged float in­flu­enced by over­all eco­nom­ic cir­cum­stances;

Con­trols on both cur­rent and cap­i­tal trans­ac­tions were abol­ished;

For­eign ex­change earn­ers were al­lowed to open US$ ac­counts in lo­cal banks or keep their funds over­seas; and

Lo­cal banks were de­clared au­tho­rised deal­ers to in­ter­act di­rect­ly with cus­tomers wish­ing to buy and sell for­eign ex­change.

Mot­t­ley and Bobb point­ed out that T&T’s world-class in­fra­struc­ture for the pro­duc­tion and mon­eti­sa­tion of nat­ur­al gas stim­u­lat­ed a strong in­flow of forex. They not­ed that the pro­duc­tion of nat­ur­al gas reached a peak of about 4 bil­lion stan­dard cu­bic feet per day (MM­SCF/D) in 2014 and is now ap­prox­i­mate­ly 2.491MM­SCF/D.

“While the sup­ply of forex has de­clined, de­mand has re­mained high. The pub­lic be­came ac­cus­tomed over a gen­er­a­tion to mar­ket con­di­tions that no longer ex­ist and have not adapt­ed to the changed cir­cum­stances,” they added.

They said that the sus­tained high de­mand for for­eign ex­change over re­cent years has in part been fu­elled by per­sis­tent fis­cal deficits, which feed liq­uid­i­ty in the bank­ing sys­tem. Mot­t­ley and Bobb al­so not­ed that over the last sev­er­al years, as the flow of for­eign ex­change fell short of de­mand, T&T drew on its stock of of­fi­cial for­eign ex­change re­serves, which fell from US$7 bil­lion at the end of 2020 to US$5.6 bil­lion in Au­gust 2024.

“This im­bal­ance be­tween cur­rent de­mand and cur­rent sup­ply can­not con­tin­ue at the ex­pense of fur­ther re­duc­tion of the stock of re­serves now at on­ly 7.8 months of im­port cov­er.”

They said while ex­port-led di­ver­si­fi­ca­tion was nec­es­sary as T&T looks to the fu­ture, the en­er­gy sec­tor will re­main the main source of for­eign ex­change for a long time, es­pe­cial­ly with the good prospect of in­creased gas sup­ply and, there­fore, forex earn­ings in the next few years.

“Even so, our eco­nom­ic his­to­ry teach­es us that we should not risk be­ing ful­ly re­liant on a resur­gent sup­ply of forex from the en­er­gy sec­tor. We face a struc­tur­al prob­lem that can be fixed on­ly by bring­ing de­mand in­to align­ment with sup­ply.

“Un­like the bib­li­cal mir­a­cle of the few loaves and fish­es that fed a mul­ti­tude, man­ag­ing an econ­o­my is about trade-offs among com­pet­ing de­mands. There is no mirac­u­lous so­lu­tion to the re­cur­ring short­age of forex.

“What­ev­er may be done to re­duce de­mand in the near term, there will re­main a clear need for a sys­tem of al­lo­cat­ing forex. As stake­hold­ers con­tin­ue to de­mand that ‘the Gov­ern­ment do some­thing’ we must not lose sight of the fact that ex­pe­ri­ence teach­es us that an ad­min­is­tra­tive sys­tem is bur­den­some, in­ef­fi­cient and less ef­fec­tive than the mar­ket-based sys­tem in place over most of the last few decades,” the econ­o­mists con­clud­ed. 

(See full com­men­tary

in Thurs­day’s

Busi­ness Guardian)


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored