JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, May 29, 2025

Trump’s China tariff shocks US importers

by

47 days ago
20250412
An employee of Learning Resources, an educational toy company, works at a warehouse in Vernon Hills, Ill., Friday, April 11, 2025. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh)

An employee of Learning Resources, an educational toy company, works at a warehouse in Vernon Hills, Ill., Friday, April 11, 2025. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh)

Nam Y. Huh

 Rick Wold­en­berg thought he had come up with a sure-fire plan to pro­tect his Chica­go-area ed­u­ca­tion­al toy com­pa­ny from Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump’s mas­sive new tax­es on Chi­nese im­ports.

“When he an­nounced a 20% tar­iff, I made a plan to sur­vive 40%, and I thought I was be­ing very clever,” said Wold­en­berg, CEO of Learn­ing Re­sources, a third-gen­er­a­tion fam­i­ly busi­ness that has been man­u­fac­tur­ing in Chi­na for four decades. “I had worked out that for a very mod­est price in­crease, we could with­stand 40% tar­iffs, which was an un­think­able in­crease in costs.”

His worst-case sce­nario wasn’t worst-case enough. Not even close.

The Amer­i­can pres­i­dent quick­ly upped the ante with Chi­na, rais­ing the levy to 54% to off­set what he said were Chi­na’s un­fair trade prac­tices. Then, en­raged when Chi­na re­tal­i­at­ed with tar­iffs of its own, he upped the levies to a stag­ger­ing 145%.

Wold­en­berg reck­ons that will push Learn­ing Re­source’s tar­iff bill from $2.3 mil­lion last year to $100.2 mil­lion in 2025. “I wish I had $100 mil­lion,” he said. “Hon­est to God, no ex­ag­ger­a­tion: It feels like the end of days.”

‘Ad­dict­ed’ to low-price Chi­nese goods

It might at least be the end of an era of in­ex­pen­sive con­sumer goods in Amer­i­ca. For four decades, and es­pe­cial­ly since Chi­na joined the World Trade Or­ga­ni­za­tion in 2001, Amer­i­cans have re­lied on Chi­nese fac­to­ries for every­thing from smart­phones to Christ­mas or­na­ments.

As ten­sions be­tween the world’s two biggest economies — and geopo­lit­i­cal ri­vals — have risen over the past decade, Mex­i­co and Cana­da have sup­plant­ed Chi­na as Amer­i­ca’s top source of im­port­ed goods and ser­vices. But Chi­na is still No. 3 — and sec­ond be­hind Mex­i­co in goods alone — and con­tin­ues to dom­i­nate in many cat­e­gories.

Chi­na pro­duces 97% of Amer­i­ca’s im­port­ed ba­by car­riages, 96% of its ar­ti­fi­cial flow­ers and um­brel­las, 95% of its fire­works, 93% of its chil­dren’s colour­ing books and 90% of its combs, ac­cord­ing to a re­port from the Mac­quar­ie in­vest­ment bank.

Over the years, Amer­i­can com­pa­nies have set up sup­ply chains that de­pend on thou­sands of Chi­nese fac­to­ries. Low tar­iffs greased the sys­tem. As re­cent­ly as Jan­u­ary 2018, U.S. tar­iffs on Chi­na av­er­aged just over 3%, ac­cord­ing to Chad Bown of the Pe­ter­son In­sti­tute for In­ter­na­tion­al Eco­nom­ics.

“Amer­i­can con­sumers cre­at­ed Chi­na,” said Joe Ju­rken, founder of the ABC Group in Mil­wau­kee, which helps U.S. busi­ness­es man­age sup­ply chains in Asia. “Amer­i­can buy­ers, the con­sumers, got ad­dict­ed to cheap pric­ing. And the brands and the re­tail­ers got ad­dict­ed to the ease of buy­ing from Chi­na.”

Slow­er growth and high­er prices

Now Trump, de­mand­ing that man­u­fac­tur­ers re­turn pro­duc­tion to Amer­i­ca, is swing­ing a tar­iff sledge­ham­mer at the Amer­i­can im­porters and the Chi­nese fac­to­ries they re­ly on.

“The con­se­quences of tar­iffs at this scale could be apoc­a­lyp­tic at many lev­els,” said David French, se­nior vice pres­i­dent of gov­ern­ment af­fairs at the Na­tion­al Re­tail Foun­da­tion.

The Yale Uni­ver­si­ty Bud­get Lab es­ti­mates that the tar­iffs that Trump has an­nounced glob­al­ly since tak­ing of­fice would low­er U.S. eco­nom­ic growth by 1.1 per­cent­age points in 2025.

The tar­iffs are al­so like­ly to push up prices. The Uni­ver­si­ty of Michi­gan’s sur­vey of con­sumer sen­ti­ment, out Fri­day, found that Amer­i­cans ex­pect long-term in­fla­tion to reach 4.4%, up from 4.1% last month.

“In­fla­tion’s go­ing up in the Unit­ed States,” said Stephen Roach, for­mer chair­man of Mor­gan Stan­ley Asia and now at Yale Law School’s Chi­na Cen­ter. “Con­sumers have fig­ured this out as well.”

“No busi­ness can run on un­cer­tain­ty”

It’s not just the size of Trump’s tar­iffs that has busi­ness­es be­wil­dered and scram­bling; it’s the speed and the un­pre­dictabil­i­ty with which the pres­i­dent is rolling them out.

On Wednes­day, the White House said the tar­iffs on Chi­na would hit 125%. A day lat­er, it cor­rect­ed that: No, the tar­iffs would be 145%, in­clud­ing a pre­vi­ous­ly an­nounced 20% to pres­sure Chi­na to do more to stop the flow of fen­tanyl in­to the Unit­ed States.

Chi­na in turn has im­posed a 125% tar­iff on the U.S. ef­fec­tive Sat­ur­day.

“There is so much un­cer­tain­ty,” said Isaac Lar­i­an, the founder of MGA En­ter­tain­ment, which makes L.O.L. and Bratz dolls, among oth­er toys. “And no busi­ness can run on un­cer­tain­ty.”

His com­pa­ny gets 65% of its prod­uct from Chi­nese fac­to­ries, a share he is try­ing to win­now down to 40% by the end of the year. MGA al­so man­u­fac­tures in In­dia, Viet­nam and Cam­bo­dia, but Trump is threat­en­ing to levy heavy tar­iffs on those coun­tries, too, af­ter de­lay­ing them for 90 days.

Lar­i­an es­ti­mates that the price of Bratz dolls could go from $15 to $40 and that of L.O.L. dolls could dou­ble to $20 by this year’s hol­i­day sea­son.

Even his Lit­tle Tikes brand, which is made in Ohio, is not im­mune. Lit­tle Tikes de­pends on screws and oth­er parts from Chi­na. Lar­i­an fig­ures the price for its toy cars could rise to $90 from a sug­gest­ed re­tail price of $65.

He said MGA would like­ly cut or­ders for the fourth quar­ter be­cause he is wor­ried that high­er prices will scare off con­sumers.

Call­ing off Chi­na pro­duc­tion plans

Marc Rosen­berg, founder and CEO of The Edge Desk in Deer­field, Illi­nois, in­vest­ed mil­lions of dol­lars of his own mon­ey to de­vel­op $1,000 er­gonom­ic chairs, which were to start pro­duc­tion in Chi­na next month.

Now’s he’s de­lay­ing pro­duc­tion while ex­plor­ing mar­kets out­side the U.S., in­clud­ing Ger­many and Italy, where his chairs wouldn’t face Trump’s triple-dig­it tar­iffs.He said he wants to see how the sit­u­a­tion plays out.

He had looked for ways to make the chairs in the Unit­ed States and had dis­cus­sions with po­ten­tial sup­pli­ers in Michi­gan, but the costs would have been 25% to 30% high­er.

“They didn’t have the skilled labour to do this stuff, and they didn’t have the de­sire to do it,” Rosen­berg said.

Mak­ing Chi­nese im­ports go ‘ka­put’

Wold­en­berg’s com­pa­ny in Ver­non Hills, Illi­nois, has been in the fam­i­ly since 1916. It was start­ed by his grand­fa­ther as a lab­o­ra­to­ry sup­ply com­pa­ny and evolved over the years in­to Learn­ing Re­sources.

The com­pa­ny spe­cial­izes in ed­u­ca­tion­al toys such as Bot­ley: The Cod­ing Ro­bot and the brain­teas­er Kanoo­dle. It em­ploys about 500 peo­ple — 90% in the Unit­ed States — and makes about 2,400 prod­ucts in Chi­na.

Wold­en­berg is reel­ing from the size and sud­den­ness of Trump’s tar­iffs.

“The prod­ucts I make in Chi­na, about 60% of what I do, be­come eco­nom­i­cal­ly un­vi­able overnight,” he said. “In an in­stant, snap of a fin­ger, they’re ka­put.”

He de­scribed Trump’s call for fac­to­ries to re­turn to the Unit­ed States as “a joke.”

“I have been look­ing for Amer­i­can man­u­fac­tur­ers for a long time ... and I have come up with ze­ro com­pa­nies to part­ner with,” he said.

The tar­iffs, un­less they’re re­duced or elim­i­nat­ed, will wipe out thou­sands of small Chi­nese sup­pli­ers, Wold­en­berg pre­dict­ed.

That would spell dis­as­ter for com­pa­nies like his that have in­stalled ex­pen­sive tools and moulds in Chi­nese fac­to­ries, he said. The stand to lose not on­ly their man­u­fac­tur­ing base but al­so pos­si­bly their tools, which could get caught up in bank­rupt­cies in Chi­na.

Learn­ing Re­sources has about 10,000 moulds, weigh­ing col­lec­tive­ly more than 5 mil­lion pounds, in Chi­na.

“It’s not like you just bring in a can­vas bag, zip it up and walk out,” Wold­en­berg said. “There is no idle man­u­fac­tur­ing hub stand­ing ful­ly equipped, full of en­gi­neers and qual­i­fied peo­ple wait­ing for me to show up with 10,000 moulds to make 2,000 prod­ucts.”

___

This sto­ry re­places 25th para­graph to clar­i­fy that Rosen­berg is de­lay­ing pro­duc­tion, not call­ing off pro­duc­tion

___

D’In­no­cen­zio re­port­ed from New York.

WASH­ING­TON (AP) —

ChinaInstagramInternational Tariff


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored