JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, February 23, 2025

Young sorry for salacious ‘cross-talk’

Kamla ignores apology and will refer him to Privileges Committee

by

129 days ago
20241017

Se­nior Re­porter

akash.sama­roo@cnc3.co.tt

The Op­po­si­tion Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC) will to­day seek House Speak­er Brigid An­nisette-George’s per­mis­sion to re­fer En­er­gy Min­is­ter Stu­art Young to Par­lia­ment’s Com­mit­tee of Priv­i­leges, over his com­ments aimed at Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar while she and oth­er mem­bers were ex­it­ing the cham­ber last week (Oc­to­ber 10).

Al­though the Port-of-Spain North/St Ann’s West MP pub­licly apol­o­gised to the pub­lic for his “hot mic” com­ment yes­ter­day, Per­sad-Bisses­sar said she was not ac­cept­ing it.

Tak­ing to his Face­book page yes­ter­day, Young said, “I ac­cept that more is ex­pect­ed of me as a rep­re­sen­ta­tive Mem­ber of Par­lia­ment, and I wish to record my re­gret that this ‘cross-talk’ has un­nec­es­sar­i­ly dis­tract­ed pub­lic dis­course. Please ac­cept my hum­blest apolo­gies.”

Young said he hoped and trust­ed that “my record of ser­vice to this coun­try speaks for it­self.”

He did, how­ev­er, not di­rect­ly re­fer to Per­sad-Bisses­sar in his apol­o­gy.

Guardian Me­dia un­der­stands that the Op­po­si­tion has writ­ten to House Speak­er Bridgid An­nisette-George, stat­ing its in­ten­tion to re­fer Young to the Com­mit­tee of Priv­i­leges.

Sources say it was on the grounds that Young used ob­scene, of­fen­sive and in­sult­ing lan­guage that brought the House in­to con­tempt and ridicule.

On Oc­to­ber 10, as Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert was get­ting set to wrap up the 2025 Bud­get de­bate, obliv­i­ous that his mi­cro­phone was on, Young was heard jok­ing­ly say­ing that the Op­po­si­tion Leader was go­ing to use the bath­room to “za­m­mi”—a cre­ole term of­ten used to de­scribe a les­bian or ho­mo­sex­u­al woman.

Sources say in their let­ter to the House Speak­er, the Op­po­si­tion said Young’s words were de­lib­er­ate­ly ma­li­cious and had no place in a so­ci­ety where women con­tin­ue to be bul­lied and face threats to their lives.

Guardian Me­dia un­der­stands that the let­ter un­der­scores that even if Young con­sid­ered his com­ments as “cross-talk,” there is a lim­it to that lev­el of “pi­cong.”

The let­ter re­port­ed­ly al­so states that the com­ment, which went vi­ral on sev­er­al me­dia plat­forms, in­ferred that Op­po­si­tion MPs, in­clud­ing the Op­po­si­tion Leader, en­gaged in pros­ti­tu­tion.

Ac­cord­ing to the Stand­ing Or­ders which gov­ern the House, a mat­ter di­rect­ly con­cern­ing the priv­i­leges of the House shall take prece­dence over all oth­er busi­ness. Any mem­ber de­sir­ing to raise a mat­ter un­der this Stand­ing Or­der shall first ob­tain leave of the Speak­er, who will de­ter­mine whether the mem­ber is en­ti­tled to raise the mat­ter as a ques­tion of priv­i­lege.

The com­mit­tee will be chaired by the House Speak­er and will con­sist of five oth­er mem­bers.

Mo­hammed: Stu­art should

have known bet­ter

Be­fore walk­ing in­to the Par­lia­ment yes­ter­day, St Au­gus­tine MP Khadi­jah Ameen told Guardian Me­dia that she hoped the mat­ter would be tak­en se­ri­ous­ly.

“The House will next meet on Thurs­day (to­day) at the end of the Stand­ing Fi­nance Com­mit­tee meet­ing and it will be in­ter­est­ing to see the rul­ing of the Speak­er. I trust that an in­ci­dent this ridicu­lous and de­spi­ca­ble will not be treat­ed as some­thing you can mere­ly apol­o­gise, sweep un­der the car­pet and go your way,” she said.

Mean­while, so­cial ac­tivist Wen­dell Ever­s­ley, who called for the apol­o­gy dur­ing a news con­fer­ence out­side the Red House on Tues­day, said he too will be ea­ger­ly await­ing An­nisette-George’s rul­ing.

“I wait­ing to see if the Speak­er, who is al­so a woman, will take ac­tion on what the Min­is­ter said. And I don’t want to know that the Speak­er said that he apol­o­gised. We have to set the high­est stan­dards in Par­lia­ment where in­tegri­ty is con­cerned,” he said.

Ever­s­ley said he was dis­ap­point­ed by the re­ac­tion of the var­i­ous women’s rights groups in this coun­try and called on them to gath­er out­side the Red House to de­mand that the Par­lia­ment deals with Young’s state­ment.

Com­ment­ing on Young’s apol­o­gy, Ever­s­ley said, “If it is sin­cere, and com­ing from his heart, I will ac­cept it but as a per­son who is al­leged to be the next leader of the PNM, I do not think he is fit to be the po­lit­i­cal leader of the PNM.”

Weigh­ing in on the con­tro­ver­sial is­sue, po­lit­i­cal an­a­lyst Dr Shane Mo­hammed said he be­lieves Young should have apol­o­gised to the Op­po­si­tion Leader di­rect­ly, par­tic­u­lar­ly as he be­lieves it’s a sen­si­tive time in so­ci­ety as it per­tains to the is­sue of bul­ly­ing.

Mo­hammed said this was not the ex­am­ple set by for­mer prime min­is­ters Patrick Man­ning and Bas­deo Pan­day.

“I think Mr Young should have known bet­ter but I be­lieve to a great ex­tent that it was in­ten­tion­al. Very un­be­com­ing of some­one who is the heir ap­par­ent to the PNM throne, very un­couth and of low cal­i­bre for some­one whom the PNM prais­es as some­one who is so pa­tri­ot­ic and cares about the coun­try over par­ty,” he said.

Mo­hammed added that the Op­po­si­tion is do­ing the right thing by seek­ing the in­ter­ven­tion of the Par­lia­ment.

“Whether or not they get it ap­proved (Priv­i­leges) they should still try be­cause some­thing of this na­ture should not just be left as old talk for us to get over. It was dis­gust­ing. The lan­guage was dis­gust­ing and while we en­cour­age cross-talk, it should be pi­cong at a lev­el that should still be re­spect­ful,” he con­tend­ed.

LGBT+ group, Queer Cor­ner Caribbean, which had called on Young to say sor­ry, al­so felt as though his apol­o­gy missed the mark.

“While we ac­knowl­edge the state­ment is­sued by the Min­is­ter, its fail­ure to ad­dress who was im­pact­ed by his com­ments di­min­ish­es its ef­fec­tive­ness. Com­ments of this na­ture from politi­cians can per­pet­u­ate a cul­ture of dis­crim­i­na­tion and hos­til­i­ty to­wards the al­ready vul­ner­a­ble LGBTQIA+ com­mu­ni­ty,” said co-founder Cherisse Berke­ley.

Berke­ley is invit­ing Young to meet with them so he can bet­ter un­der­stand the so­ci­etal ram­i­fi­ca­tions of his state­ment.

‘We all make mis­takes’

How­ev­er, the Port-of-Spain North/St Ann’s West MP is re­ceiv­ing sup­port from with­in his par­ty.

San Fer­nan­do East MP Bri­an Man­ning said, “We all make mis­takes and that’s just how it goes.”

For­mer PNM gen­er­al sec­re­tary Ash­ton Ford be­lieves Young’s apol­o­gy was sin­cere and shows that he is a class above the UNC MPs.

“Every time a politi­cian ac­cepts re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for some­thing it is in good stand­ing. When the woman (Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar) made deroga­to­ry com­ments about Dr Row­ley she nev­er apol­o­gised. When she said he was the child of a rape vic­tim, you re­mem­ber that? And no apol­o­gy came,” he ar­gued.

Ford said the PNM is a dif­fer­ent breed and when they recog­nise an er­ror, it is ad­dressed im­me­di­ate­ly.

The PNM stal­wart al­so sought to dis­miss claims that Young’s apol­o­gy was mere­ly to clean up his im­age as the PNM re­port­ed­ly seeks a suc­ces­sor to its leader Dr Kei­th Row­ley.

“His im­age has not been tar­nished, there is al­ways cross-talk in Par­lia­ment, is just that this one come out. You don’t know what them fel­las say to PNM peo­ple across the floor, so don’t feel this is an iso­lat­ed case. I have been in Par­lia­ment and I’ve heard worse than that. I don’t see this af­fect­ing Min­is­ter Young or the par­ty,” he said.

On Tues­day dur­ing a Stand­ing Fi­nance Com­mit­tee meet­ing, House Speak­er An­nisette-George said she will not be tol­er­at­ing dis­re­spect in the Par­lia­ment. She al­so en­cour­aged mem­bers to man­age their be­hav­iours.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored