JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, March 24, 2025

Climate change impacts on T&T

by

Mariano Browne
554 days ago
20230917
 Mariano Browne

Mariano Browne

Nicole Drayton

The flood­ing in Libya last week added to the list of nat­ur­al dis­as­ters that could be traced to an­thro­pogenic (hu­man-caused) cli­mate change. The Amer­i­can Me­te­o­ro­log­i­cal So­ci­ety re­port­ed that every ma­jor study on heat­waves and ex­treme rain­fall events is trace­able to hu­man in­flu­ence on cli­mate change. Cli­mate change has in­creased the num­ber and in­ten­si­ty of ex­treme sea lev­el events as­so­ci­at­ed with trop­i­cal cy­clones and af­fect­ed the in­ten­si­ty of oth­er ex­treme events such as flood­ing. This in­creas­es the vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty of small is­land states, low-ly­ing cities and coast­lines.

Take a dri­ve to Man­zanil­la to view the dam­age caused by one storm which de­stroyed hous­es and a large part of the coastal road. Be­tween 1970 and 2019, the Caribbean, Cen­tral and North Amer­i­ca ac­count­ed for 18 per cent of world­wide weath­er and wa­ter-re­lat­ed dam­age record­ing 1,977 dis­as­ters, 74,839 deaths, and loss­es of US $1.7 tril­lion. The US ac­count­ed for 38 per cent of glob­al eco­nom­ic loss­es. Storms and floods were the most preva­lent causal fac­tors (WMO).

Cli­mate change is not new. Coun­tries have de­bat­ed ways to com­bat cli­mate change since the 1990s. There have been 27 con­fer­ences un­der the Unit­ed Na­tions Frame­work Con­ven­tion on Cli­mate Change (UN­FC­CC). They have re­sult­ed in the Ky­oto Pro­to­col in 1992, the Paris Agree­ment in 2015 and the Sendai Frame­work for Dis­as­ter Risk Re­duc­tion. Whilst gov­ern­ments have gen­er­al­ly agreed on the sci­ence be­hind cli­mate change, they have dis­agreed on who is most re­spon­si­ble, how to track emis­sion tar­gets, and how to com­pen­sate hard­er-hit coun­tries.

As NGC’s CEO Mark Lo­quan point­ed out last week, green­ing an econ­o­my is an ex­pen­sive busi­ness.

Those changes must be fi­nanced, di­vert­ing funds from cur­rent ex­pen­di­tures that would im­pact every cit­i­zen. Like many coun­tries, al­though those com­mit­ments have been trans­lat­ed in­to tar­gets, T&T has not pur­sued these tar­gets with any im­me­di­a­cy. T&T’s de­clared goal is to re­duce emis­sions in in­dus­try, pow­er gen­er­a­tion, and trans­port by 15 per cent by 2030. Ac­tions to achieve these tar­gets have been slow as those changes are ex­pen­sive and un­pop­u­lar with cit­i­zens. The neg­a­tive re­ac­tion to TTEC’s pro­posed rate in­creas­es ex­em­pli­fies the re­sis­tance.

To meet these goals T&T must in­crease its use of re­new­able en­er­gy and use up to 50 per cent less nat­ur­al gas to gen­er­ate elec­tric­i­ty and in­crease the price of elec­tric­i­ty to its true cost. This means that cit­i­zens must be al­lowed to in­stall and op­er­ate re­new­able en­er­gy de­vices, cur­rent­ly il­le­gal un­der the TTEC Act. The coun­try needs few­er, more ef­fi­cient pub­lic trans­port sys­tems and oth­er mea­sures to re­duce traf­fic con­ges­tion. The re­al­i­ty is that T&T is en­er­gy in­ef­fi­cient mean­ing that the coun­try us­es more en­er­gy than re­quired to gen­er­ate its out­put. There are on­ly sev­en years to 2030. Mak­ing these changes in a short time­frame will have desta­bil­is­ing ef­fects.

This will be a lot for con­sumers to di­gest. Oth­er fac­tors af­fect­ing cit­i­zens must be in­clud­ed. In­sur­ers serve a crit­i­cal role in the econ­o­my as in­vestors, risk man­agers, and a risk trans­fer re­source that helps pro­tect pol­i­cy­hold­ers from loss and as­sists in re­cov­ery from cli­mate-re­lat­ed dis­as­ters. In­sur­ance costs will in­crease. Most gen­er­al in­sur­ance con­tracts are rein­sured abroad mean­ing that do­mes­tic ca­su­al­ty risks (ex­cept mo­tor) are shared by in­ter­na­tion­al ca­su­al­ty risk-tak­ers (rein­sur­ers). Cur­rent­ly. Do­mes­tic in­sur­ance com­pa­nies are faced with un­friend­ly rein­sur­ers as they are not pay­ing the rein­sur­ance pre­mi­ums on time as they can­not ac­cess the nec­es­sary for­eign ex­change. This is an im­me­di­ate dan­ger.

This sit­u­a­tion is com­pli­cat­ed by the fact that loss­es from ex­treme weath­er events in­crease in­sur­ance pre­mi­ums. Based on IMF cal­cu­la­tions, the Fi­nan­cial Times ar­gues that the en­tire fi­nan­cial sys­tem has un­der­es­ti­mat­ed the im­pact of cli­mate change. Agri­cul­ture is among the most vul­ner­a­ble sec­tors as it is af­fect­ed by weath­er and wa­ter scarci­ty. So is tourism, but a coun­try could sur­vive with­out tourism but not with­out food.

The world is reel­ing from record-break­ing heat­waves, wild­fires, rain­fall, and dev­as­tat­ing floods which ac­count­ed for 56 per cent of all in­sur­ance loss­es be­tween 2018-22 ac­cord­ing to Moody’s. Lives lost and peo­ple dis­pos­sessed give some mea­sure of the dam­age.  

But the cost can al­so be mea­sured in the eco­nom­ic val­ue de­stroyed, and po­ten­tial­ly cre­at­ed, as gov­ern­ments shift poli­cies to con­tain or mit­i­gate the cli­mate cri­sis. In a world that is rapid­ly be­com­ing more vul­ner­a­ble to ex­treme weath­er events, out­dat­ed as­sump­tions about as­set val­ues al­so need re­cal­i­brat­ing.

In­sur­ance com­pa­nies have man­aged to sur­vive, reg­u­la­to­ry is­sues, fraud, weath­er un­pre­dictabil­i­ty, and chang­ing con­sumer pat­terns. The in­creas­ing com­plex­i­ty of cli­mate change is chal­leng­ing in­sur­ance com­pa­nies to ad­just in oth­er ways. Two top US in­sur­ers, All­state and State Farm have stopped writ­ing in­sur­ance busi­ness in some US states (Cal­i­for­nia) as there is no point in ac­cept­ing busi­ness­es that gen­er­ate loss­es that could make an in­sur­ance com­pa­ny in­sol­vent.

To make the point pel­lu­cid, in ev­i­dence be­fore a Sen­ate sub­com­mit­tee on in­sur­ance and wild­fires on March 8, Dave Burt, CEO of an in­vest­ment re­search firm, said that “there sim­ply isn’t enough mon­ey be­ing col­lect­ed to cov­er the costs re­lat­ed to cli­mate change as the risks keep in­creas­ing”. He es­ti­mat­ed that pre­mi­ums for wild­fire cov­er­age amount­ed to USD 1.5 bil­lion com­pared to $9 bil­lion in claims in 2021.

How the in­sur­ance sec­tor ad­justs to this in­creas­ing­ly risky en­vi­ron­ment is a lead­ing in­di­ca­tor of how the change would af­fect the T&T econ­o­my.

Mar­i­ano Browne is the Chief Ex­ec­u­tive Of­fi­cer of the UWI Arthur Lok Jack Glob­al School of Busi­ness. 

columnist


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored