JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, March 10, 2025

Perspectives on the upcoming budget

by

Dr Winford James
533 days ago
20230924
Dr Winford James

Dr Winford James

I want to talk sen­si­bly about time­ly per­spec­tives the up­com­ing bud­get might fea­ture, but the Gov­ern­ment has not pro­vid­ed me with its re­views of its eco­nom­ic per­for­mance to en­able me to do so. It has not en­gaged the pub­lic on the macro mea­sures—or any oth­er kind of mea­sures for that mat­ter—that the coun­try needs to grow its re­al GDP and push it to­wards the achieve­ment of the vi­sion of de­vel­oped coun­try sta­tus by 2030. So I, along with every oth­er com­men­ta­tor, am left to spec­u­late about what is ap­pro­pri­ate.

It’s been like that from as far back as I can re­mem­ber. It is quite clear­ly a cul­tur­al style of bud­get prepa­ra­tion and pre­sen­ta­tion that must be ad­just­ed if we want to im­prove our GDP and ad­vance our de­vel­op­ment sta­tus. There’s no law that says we must me­chan­i­cal­ly or ro­bot­i­cal­ly de­pend on oil and gas for our de­vel­op­ment.

Luck­i­ly, I can fall back on ex­tra­na­tion­al bod­ies like the World Bank and the In­ter-Amer­i­can De­vel­op­ment Bank for rel­e­vant da­ta. The World Bank has pub­lished de­vel­op­ment in­di­ca­tors, for ex­am­ple:

Be­tween in­de­pen­dence (1962) and 2022, GDP per capi­ta grew by two per cent an­nu­al­ly.

In the last 20 years, re­al GDP per capi­ta grew at a low­er av­er­age rate of 1.8 per cent per year.

In the last decade, re­al GDP per capi­ta de­clined at 1.2 per cent an­nu­al­ly.

In the five years be­fore COVID, re­al GDP per capi­ta de­clined by 3.5 per cent per year.

Now, P(ur­chas­ing) P(ow­er) P(ar­i­ty) is a macro­eco­nom­ic analy­sis met­ric used to com­pare eco­nom­ic pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and stan­dards of liv­ing be­tween coun­tries. And G(ross) D(omes­tic) P(rod­uct) is a mon­e­tary mea­sure of the mar­ket val­ue of all the fi­nal goods and ser­vices pro­duced in a spe­cif­ic time frame by a coun­try. They are both tools for mea­sur­ing the eco­nom­ic pro­duc­tiv­i­ty of a coun­try. The high­er the PPP and the GDP, the bet­ter off the coun­try.

T&T had an es­ti­mat­ed PPP of $14,480 in 2022. If the coun­try could sus­tain the two per cent trend (from 1962 to 2022), the econ­o­my would at­tain a GDP of about $16,632 by 2030, the tar­get­ed year of de­vel­oped coun­try sta­tus. But clear­ly, that trend of growth is woe­ful­ly in­ad­e­quate. In fact, if we took on board the IDB’s es­ti­mate that the GDP grew by 3.1 per cent in 2022, grow­ing the GDP at that rate (with the pop­u­la­tion growth held sta­tion­ary) would on­ly de­liv­er a measly GDP per capi­ta of PPP$17,929 by 2030.

By com­par­i­son, in 2019, the av­er­age GDP per capi­ta of de­vel­oped coun­tries was about $50,000. We would have to ei­ther aban­don the dream of achiev­ing de­vel­oped coun­try sta­tus by 2030 or push up the ac­tu­al growth rate to about 20 per cent, which, by cur­rent eco­nom­ic prac­tice, is un­at­tain­able.

To achieve that re­fo­cus, the Gov­ern­ment would have to em­brace the fol­low­ing key ini­tia­tives: a) up­grade the pol­i­cy­mak­ing in­sti­tu­tions to achieve con­sen­sus on com­pet­i­tive strat­e­gy; b) in­sti­tu­tion of a large-scale pub­lic ed­u­ca­tion pro­gramme to en­able cit­i­zen par­tic­i­pa­tion in shap­ing their fu­ture; c) pur­suit of a bas­ket of ini­tia­tives to achieve re­al di­ver­si­fi­ca­tion of the econ­o­my; and d) seek to sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly up­grade the coun­try’s ca­pac­i­ty to in­no­vate.

The pol­i­cy­mak­ing in­sti­tu­tions I have in mind are the ma­jor ones of Par­lia­ment and of gov­ern­ment in To­ba­go. They would have to be rad­i­cal­ly re­formed to en­able leg­isla­tive and pub­lic con­trol of the Cab­i­net and the Ex­ec­u­tive Coun­cil. The coun­try bad­ly needs to de­vel­op ef­fec­tive over­sight arrange­ments that mod­er­ate the role of the Cab­i­net and the Coun­cil, even in re­spect of the bud­get.

Bud­get-mak­ing would al­so have to be ad­just­ed—from past prac­tice to pro­vide for ini­ti­a­tion of a large-scale pub­lic ed­u­ca­tion pro­gramme to fa­cil­i­tate cit­i­zen par­tic­i­pa­tion in shap­ing their fu­ture. This kind of change would not come eas­i­ly; our al­pha politi­cians would have to be struck down and have their eyes opened like the Apos­tle Paul on the road to Dam­as­cus in his zeal­ous cam­paign to ar­rest pi­o­neer­ing Chris­tians.

In re­spect of di­ver­si­fi­ca­tion, which every­body talks about but about which no co­her­ent pol­i­cy has been de­vel­oped to ma­te­ri­al­ly change the sta­tus quo, there is a great need to fo­cus on the key role of grow­ing ex­portable cap­i­tal pro­duc­tion per work­er in tar­get­ed sec­tors such as ed­u­ca­tion, health­care, and the cre­ative arts. Yes, Ex­portable. Cap­i­tal. Pro­duc­tion.

It is more than time to fo­cus, not just on the do­mes­tic mar­ket but al­so on the ex­port mar­ket—per­haps more on the lat­ter, even if ex­per­i­men­tal­ly. This kind of trans­for­ma­tion is not a mere dream. The ini­tia­tives can be sus­tained if fund­ed by sus­tain­able deficit spend­ing, de­vel­op­ment cred­it, grow­ing val­i­dat­ing do­mes­tic sav­ings through a ris­ing prof­it rate, and for­eign cap­i­tal in­flows to the cap­i­tal-pro­duc­ing sec­tors at­tract­ed by con­sen­sus pol­i­cy.

The oth­er ini­tia­tives, es­pe­cial­ly the ini­tia­tive to sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly up­grade the coun­try’s ca­pac­i­ty to in­no­vate, would be achieved by fa­cil­i­tat­ing in­vest­ment de­signed to grow em­ploy­ment of work­ers with high lev­els of knowl­edge, prob­lem-solv­ing skills, and self-con­fi­dence. Many of these work­ers would have to be pro­duced by a rad­i­cal­ly re­formed ed­u­ca­tion sys­tem with the aid of mod­ern ma­chine learn­ing. Many would al­so have to be for­eign, linked to the ef­forts to at­tract for­eign en­tre­pre­neurs.

These kinds of per­spec­tives might not show up in the forth­com­ing bud­get, but they are what the coun­try must even­tu­al­ly adopt to achieve its fun­da­men­tal de­vel­op­ment goals.

Win­ford James is a re­tired UWI lec­tur­er who has been analysing is­sues in ed­u­ca­tion, lan­guage, de­vel­op­ment, and pol­i­tics in Trinidad and To­ba­go and the wider Caribbean on ra­dio and TV since the 1970s. He has al­so writ­ten hun­dreds of columns for all the ma­jor news­pa­pers in the coun­try. He can be reached at jay­win­ster

@gmail.com

columnist


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored