JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

Repechage rounds coming for Paris 2024 Olympics

.... What this means for the future of athletics

by

976 days ago
20220903

World Ath­let­ics has an­nounced the in­tro­duc­tion of a “repechage round” which will de­but at the Paris 2024 Olympic Games. This will see track ath­letes who com­pete in events rang­ing from 200m to 1,500m, in­clud­ing hur­dles, be­ing giv­en a sec­ond chance to qual­i­fy for the se­mi-fi­nals of their event.

This an­nounce­ment was made in Ju­ly 2022 by World Ath­let­ics and will dif­fer from the tra­di­tion­al au­to­mat­ic time qual­i­fiers, or “fastest losers” ad­vanc­ing to the se­mi-fi­nals. Es­sen­tial­ly some ath­letes will now com­pete in four rounds in­stead of three (round one, repechage round, se­mi-fi­nals and the fi­nal). The 100m events have a pre­lim­i­nary heat be­fore round one and the repechage was there­fore ex­clud­ed for these events.

This an­nounce­ment has led to nu­mer­ous ques­tions and calls for clar­i­fi­ca­tion, as there are con­cerns sur­round­ing the im­pact on re­cov­ery and per­for­mance, the like­li­hood of in­juries and the an­tic­i­pat­ed strain on sports prac­ti­tion­ers to fo­cus more en­er­gy and time on faster or more ef­fi­cient re­cov­ery and prepar­ing ath­letes for pos­si­bly more events.

If an ath­lete par­tic­i­pates in a 200m repechage round due to poor per­for­mance in the heats and makes it to the se­mi-fi­nals and the fi­nals, that ath­lete would have had to be pre­pared for four dif­fer­ent races, as op­posed to the three that are cus­tom­ary. What this means for the ath­lete is ex­po­sure to greater phys­i­o­log­i­cal stress and de­pend­ing on how the events are sched­uled, they may be ex­posed to mus­cle fa­tigue, poor re­cov­ery and an in­creased risk of in­juries.

For ath­letes com­pet­ing in the 1,500m events, this con­cern is mag­ni­fied, as it is a more de­mand­ing event and re­quires a longer re­cov­ery pe­ri­od. Will World Ath­let­ics strong­ly con­sid­er tim­ing be­tween these repechage rounds and the se­mi-fi­nals to give these ath­letes an equal op­por­tu­ni­ty at re­cov­ery, as for those who would have qual­i­fied for the se­mi-fi­nals from the heats? Is this a re­al sec­ond chance at medalling or just an in­creased chance of a ca­reer-end­ing in­jury? We wait to see how World Ath­let­ics will deal with this is­sue when sched­ul­ing events.

Mod­ern ath­let­ics has seen ath­letes com­pet­ing in two and even three events in one cham­pi­onship. For ex­am­ple, it is not un­com­mon for the re­lay teams to be com­prised of ath­letes who com­pet­ed in the sprints, or for per­sons to com­pete in both the 100m and 200m sprints. De­pend­ing on their per­for­mance in round one, these ath­letes will now have not just one, but sev­er­al ad­di­tion­al rounds when con­sid­ered across events. Will sched­ul­ing take this in­to ac­count? Over­work and in­jury once again be­come a con­cern. Is it pos­si­ble that the im­ple­men­ta­tion of the repechage round may force or­gan­i­sa­tions to lim­it ath­letes to one event on­ly.

An­oth­er ma­jor ques­tion that has not been ad­dressed is the con­cern re­gard­ing false starts; will ath­letes who false start al­so be giv­en a sec­ond op­por­tu­ni­ty in a repechage round to prove him or her­self? A false start is syn­ony­mous with a poor start and there­fore should be treat­ed sim­i­lar­ly. Al­so, whilst a rea­son is giv­en for the ex­clu­sion of the 100m, what is the rea­son for the 1,500m cut-off?

How will this ma­jor change be in­te­grat­ed by sports or­gan­i­sa­tions? The plan is to be im­ple­ment­ed in Paris 2024, which does not leave much time for or­gan­i­sa­tions, ath­letes and coach­es to con­duct tri­al runs to fig­ure out how this will all work and the im­pact it will have on ath­letes’ per­for­mance.

Sports prac­ti­tion­ers will al­so need to have first-hand ex­pe­ri­ence of what will be re­quired of the ath­letes and to fig­ure out the best strate­gies to mit­i­gate against in­jury should they find them­selves cov­er­ing ath­letes who will par­tic­i­pate in the repechage round. Many teams in our re­gion may on­ly have one phys­i­cal ther­a­pist/doc­tor as­signed to work with the team, so hav­ing these ad­di­tion­al rounds in­clud­ed for mul­ti­ple events may place sig­nif­i­cant pres­sure on al­ready over­worked staff.

Sports man­age­ment teams must be­gin to con­sid­er whether they will need to source ad­di­tion­al help, if at all even eco­nom­i­cal­ly fea­si­ble, as they pre­pare for the 2024 Olympics.

The con­cept of the repechage round is not to­tal­ly new and is used in wrestling and taek­won­do at the Olympics. These sports are, how­ev­er, quite dif­fer­ent from track events and whilst there may be ap­plic­a­ble lessons from the im­ple­men­ta­tion of the repechage round for those events, there may be dif­fer­ent chal­lenges for track.

Where­as a repechage round might ben­e­fit an ath­lete psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly and give them the op­por­tu­ni­ty of a sec­ond chance at prov­ing them­selves, there are mea­sures that must be put in place to en­sure that this im­ple­men­ta­tion pro­tects the well­be­ing of our ath­letes and the in­tegri­ty of the sport. The world of ath­let­ics waits with bat­ed breath for fur­ther up­dates from World Ath­let­ics about the in­tri­ca­cies of the repechage round im­ple­men­ta­tion and how it will ben­e­fit ath­let­ics.

Mau­rice Fish­er is a med­ical doc­tor who is pur­su­ing a mas­ter’s de­gree in Sports Med­i­cine at the UWI Fac­ul­ty of Sport.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored