For almost a decade the countries of the Caribbean have had to rely on the Jamaican-owned Sportsmax Station for its coverage of local and international sports. While its coverage of international sport, whereby it merely re-broadcasts events being covered by our television stations, is a welcome relief to the Caribbean community, broadcasts for which it is solely responsible have become the bane of our sporting existence.
It is probably too much to expect one to exist without the other, but it is certainly not too much to have expected Sportsmax to have upped their game over the many years in which they have been doing the sporting coverage themselves.
Sporting fans are still smarting from the sub-par coverage provided of the 2024 Paris Olympics wherein the armchair in-studio hosts seemed to lack many of the basic communication skills and even sporting knowledge that might be expected of such hosts – setting aside the colloquial Jamaica bias.
The 2025 Carifta Games coverage, however, must be the final straw if this region is to achieve the highest standards possible .
When it was announced that the 2025 Carifta Games would be hosted in Trinidad and Tobago, there was concern over whether coverage would be available locally. These fears were alleviated, and given that the events covered three normally quiet days of Saturday, Sunday and Monday (not including the opening ceremony on Friday), it promised a feast for local enthusiasts unable/unwilling to go to Port-of-Spain.
Given the paucity of the local horse racing scene on Easter Monday, the events would and should also have provided a useful distraction on what was traditionally one of the best horse racing days in the country in the past.
However, for many with a sporting appreciation of quality and awareness of the importance of television in sports, the coverage started poorly and only went downhill from there.
Clearly our broadcasters do not operate with the same budget as their overseas counterparts, but is that the only reason our coverage is so poor? From the position of the television cameras to the commentary provided on the events themselves, our Caribbean viewers are left gasping for proper coverage.
On too many occasions to be bad luck, the athletes are crossing the finish line, and the camera is aimed somewhere else. On too many occasions to be bad luck, the commentators seem to have no idea as to the names of the athletes in the races – with the obvious exceptions of the Jamaican competitors (some early research and preparation would assist in addition to the numbers on the chest of all athletes).
For those athletes from Jamaica, we are provided with too much information – we know what high school they attended, maybe even the primary school, the names of their teachers, coaches, etc.
Nothing is wrong with personalising the athletes, but it should be universal if it is to happen and not just focused on personalising the athletes from one country. It should be stated that there were profiles on some Trinidad and Tobago athletes, but what about the other countries: the Bahamas, St Lucia, Guyana, Barbados, Grenada, Aruba, and the US Virgin Islands?
How difficult would it have been to request the various countries to each select two or three standout athletes and send video highlights of them for the broadcaster to utilise if it was too expensive for Sportsmax to send a team to each island to conduct such a thing? In these modern times and with adequate technology, this can be done with proper planning .
The post-race interviews also leave a lot to be desired – what exactly is that interviewer trying to find out … certainly nothing that is of interest to the viewers.
The exchanges on many occasions between the interviewers seem almost juvenile in their nature, not the sort of professional coverage that we would have come to expect from the viewing of many international athletic events such as the Diamond League, etc., but alas, maybe we are asking too much.
Can I suggest talking with the leading track and field analyst Ato Jabari Boldon for the requisite advice going forward if we expect to raise the bar?
Sportsmax has to do more to make themselves a truly regional broadcaster, and this has nothing to do with whether they establish physical presences in all countries.
The professionalism of their broadcasts needs to improve. Why would someone pay to stream broadcasts that appear to be done on a shoestring budget? If they want to play in the big league, they must invest more.
To the extent that Sportsmax can become a truly regional sports broadcaster, this can have a very positive impact on sport in the Caribbean since they, in turn, might be able to attract international sponsorship, and the attention gathered by the local sporting organisations may improve their own ability to reinvest in the sport’s activities. This is not an easy task, but to achieve quality , it demands investment .
On the local horse racing front, as expected, Easter Monday racing was a pale image of past glorious years. Former champion trainer Glenn Mendez had a great day winning with his only two runners on the day’s card (his third runner was withdrawn at the start) and confirmed his ability to get the best out of his runners.
The fact that the Trinidad horses which travelled to Barbados to contest their races on Sandy Lane Gold Cup day have been unable to return to this country provides more fuel to the arguments against travelling horses between countries.
Thankfully, one of them which travelled to Barbados, Hello World, was a winner; otherwise connections would wonder aloud over the futility of making the trip. The other horses stranded in Barbados were not so fortunate, and so their connections must be ruing the adventure.
Hopefully, they will be back sooner rather than later.