JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, April 3, 2025

MEN­TAL HEALTH MAT­TERS

How do we recover from words that hurt?

by

20130122

I'm known to have a sharp tongue. A hot-mouth is what they called me and so over the years I've laboured on ma­tur­ing in that area and, well, I'm still en­rolled.

I own books like Words That Hurt, Words That Heal by Ca­r­ole May­hall, Me and My Big Mouth by Joyce Mey­er, When to Speak Up and When To Shut Up by Dr Michael Sedler, and many oth­er ti­tles in that genre of life-chang­ing-through-tongue-lash­ing lit­er­a­ture about your filthy mouth.

Bible quotes such as James 3:8 "But the tongue can no man tame, it is an un­ruly evil full of dead­ly poi­son" have been my dai­ly prompt. And in the Proverbs, I've found an in­struc­tive one that says, "When words are many sin is not ab­sent."

My bend to change has come from per­son­al con­vic­tions about my some­times un­gra­cious­ness, but the hurt placed on me by the mouths of oth­ers has pro­vid­ed im­pe­tus.

Very ear­ly I learned that the id­iom "Sticks and stones may break my bones (but words will nev­er hurt me)" is a lie, a ploy to get chil­dren to de­flect hurt­ful crit­i­cism/slan­der.

As an eight-year-old I was told by a class­mate that I was "as poor as a 'sursh' rat" (sic)" and, while I had not as yet recog­nised the ab­ject pover­ty in which I lived, she en­sured I ap­pre­ci­at­ed her malev­o­lence, telling me in the pres­ence of laugh­ing school­mates, "You have no fwigze (sic), you eh hah no TV and yuh does iron on a coal pot."

That re­al­ly hurt and I think I would have pre­ferred to fight and lose than to be smacked down with such an in­sult.

It seemed not our fault for be­ing with­out those ap­pli­ances–we had no elec­tric­i­ty un­til 1978–but in an ef­fort to un­der­stand my hurt, I went home and asked my moth­er if I was poor. In her calmest voice she en­quired why I want­ed to know and I re­peat­ed the in­ci­dent.

Hmm. Lawd. If you on­ly knew my moth­er's pride lev­el, eh! Her black face seemed a bluish pur­ple as she leaned in­to me, and with a voice be­ly­ing the cool de­meanour of one minute be­fore, she bel­lowed, "Yuh have some­where to sleep? Yuh have clothes? You eat food to­day?"

I doubt if she heard my an­swers, but hav­ing re­spond­ed to each ques­tion, she then de­clared, "Well then, you not poor. Go back and tell her that you have beau­ty and brains and that is all you need to car­ry you through life."

My moth­er shield­ed me with her wis­dom. Her un­com­pli­cat­ed phi­los­o­phy has buoyed my en­tire life. But I learned chil­dren could be bru­tal!

Now, with a re­cov­er­ing mouth, and smart­ing from the pun­ish­ing I've had from the mouths of oth­ers, I'm cir­cum­spect about the pow­er of words. Words hurt more than sticks and stones and do ir­repara­ble dam­age. Whether it's un­der the ruse of pi­cong, gos­sip, sal­vo, or ex­pos�, all words that are dam­ag­ing cause long-term in­jury.

Those ut­tered pub­licly and par­tic­u­lar­ly in pol­i­tics and open fo­rums, which are then re­peat­ed ad in­fini­tum, I know, con­tribute to in­sta­bil­i­ty in so­ci­eties.

So ruf­fled am I by the on­go­ing ac­ri­mo­ny of po­lit­i­cal op­po­nents, that even as the dust of the THA elec­tions be­gins to set­tle, I'm al­ready in dread of the up­com­ing lo­cal-gov­ern­ment elec­tion cam­paign­ing and the run-up to the next gen­er­al elec­tion.

This place is steeped with abus­es, which seem bent to char­ac­ter as­sas­si­na­tion. And if we do not quick­ly em­ploy cam­paign reg­u­la­tions on ad­ver­tis­ing, es­pe­cial­ly truth in ad­ver­tis­ing, then in nurs­ery-rhyme con­jec­ture, Lon­don Bridge will fall down–and right on top of us.

It seems that slan­der, pro­vok­ing ac­cu­sa­tions, and all man­ner of cru­el­ty are the cho­sen paths of ex­pres­sion here, where, in the words of US Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma, we "treat name-call­ing as rea­soned de­bate" and in­fuse "sus­pi­cion and fear of those who ap­pear dif­fer­ent to us" ei­ther by class, eth­nic­i­ty or par­ti­san­ship.

Veg­eta­bles, ves­sels from In­dia and Africa, and some mea­sure of vi­o­lence all formed the head­lines in a vi­tu­per­a­tive cam­paign, and at the end of the day, that's what we will re­mem­ber.

The wil­ful­ness of our in­tent to break each oth­er's back was com­pound­ed by my Prime Min­is­ter's cam­paign at­tire, in which she clothed her­self in "Ill-judg­ing in­dul­gence" to pro­claim she has "court clothes," where­as it seemed to me that she was best placed, as leader of an en­tire na­tion, to pro­nounce in­vec­tives against the pro­lif­er­a­tion of vil­lain­ous hus­tings con­duct.

This is a most un­for­tu­nate junc­ture in our af­fairs. But, now, who is go­ing to help us heal as we rein­te­grate in­to our com­mu­ni­ties to live in neigh­bourly re­pose?

As cit­i­zens of T&T, when our lead­ers ex­hib­it di­vi­sive­ness, we must re­solve to hold our­selves to a stan­dard marked not just by the ex­er­cise of the fran­chise to vote, but by the val­ues up­held as oth­ers can­vass for our vote–or mark my words, cra­paud will smoke we pipe.

?


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored