JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 1, 2025

Attzs: CDAP meant for most vulnerable

by

Peter Christopher
269 days ago
20240605
Economists Dr Marlene Attz

Economists Dr Marlene Attz

PE­TER CHRISTO­PHER

Se­nior Mul­ti­me­da Re­porter

pe­ter.christo­pher@guardian.co.tt

Glob­al in­fla­tion­ary pres­sures have like­ly led to in­creased cost in health care, and as a re­sult pro­grammes like Chron­ic Dis­ease As­sis­tance Pro­gramme (CDAP) may be due for a re­view, econ­o­mist Dr Mar­lene Attzs said yes­ter­day.

On Mon­day, dur­ing a Stand­ing Fi­nance Com­mit­tee sit­ting, Fi­nance Min­is­ter said in par­lia­ment that CDAP is putting a strain on the Health Min­istry's bud­get.

Dur­ing the com­mit­tee sit­ting Im­bert said, "It is prov­ing quite dif­fi­cult to fi­nance the pur­chase of free phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals and all the oth­er free ser­vices that are avail­able in the health sec­tor. So I just want Mem­bers (of Par­lia­ment) to un­der­stand this. We be­lieve this is im­por­tant, we have to do it, but to find that $500 mil­lion is go­ing to prove to be very dif­fi­cult.”

When asked about the Min­is­ter's po­si­tion, Dr Attzs said it should be con­tex­tu­alised along­side a con­ver­sa­tion of health­care re­form.

She said, "How do we en­sure ef­fi­cien­cy, both in terms of qual­i­ty and de­liv­ery in our health­care sys­tem. Giv­en that CDAP re­al­ly sup­ports free pre­scrip­tion drugs and oth­er phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal items for non-com­mu­ni­ca­ble dis­eases such as our di­a­betes, asth­ma, arthri­tis and high blood pres­sure, for ex­am­ple, I think the first is­sue would be how do we pre­vent the oc­cur­rence, and the in­crease in the oc­cur­rence, of these kinds of dis­eases? What kind of pre­ven­tive mea­sures can be put in place?"

Giv­en that glob­al in­fla­tion has seen prices soar in­ter­na­tion­al­ly, she said a re­view of the pro­cure­ment of drugs for the pro­gramme may be re­quired.

Im­bert said for the 2024 fis­cal year, some $555.9 mil­lion had been al­lo­cat­ed for phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals in the Min­is­ter's pre­sen­ta­tion. The break­down of the lat­ter in­clud­ed $132 mil­lion (on­col­o­gy drugs), $20.6 mil­lion (HIV drugs), $40.5 mil­lion (an­tibi­otics), $60 mil­lion (NCD drugs), $48.7 mil­lion (psy­chi­a­try), and $84.8 mil­lion (non-phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals) with $1.4 mil­lion for HPV vac­cines.

"My sec­ond point is that there should be a mul­ti­fac­eted ap­proach to re­view­ing the costs as­so­ci­at­ed with CDAP, in­clud­ing a re­view of the ex­ist­ing process to en­sure that the gov­ern­ment and the peo­ple of Trinidad and To­ba­go are get­ting val­ue for our mon­ey," Attzs said.

"I pre­sume the pro­gramme has been re­viewed over the years, but maybe it's time for an­oth­er re­view, giv­en what has been hap­pen­ing glob­al­ly, the in­crease in prices glob­al­ly and the fact that we would then have to pay high­er prices for phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals. That re­view can out­line whether we need to re­view the ap­proved list of drugs and whether we need to re­view the pro­cure­ment process to ob­tain these phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals and whether there is a pos­si­bil­i­ty of ne­go­ti­at­ing bet­ter prices."

How­ev­er Dr. Attzs warned that any ad­just­ment to CDAP should take in­to con­sid­er­a­tion the pro­gramme is meant to cater for the most vul­ner­a­ble in our so­ci­ety.

"There al­ways has to be a bal­anc­ing act in terms of the es­ca­lat­ing costs of the im­pact on the bud­get. But we should be mind­ful that CDAP re­al­ly al­lows those per­sons who are among the most vul­ner­a­ble in our so­ci­ety to have ac­cess to these phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals that they need to man­age their health sta­tus. So what­ev­er re­cal­i­bra­tion that has to be done to this pro­gramme, we should en­sure that those vul­ner­a­ble per­sons in our so­ci­ety are not, in any way, dis­ad­van­taged or in­con­ve­nienced in terms of their ac­cess to af­ford­able health­care to man­age their health sta­tus," said Dr Attzs.

In a post to so­cial me­dia, the Fi­nance Min­is­ter clar­i­fied his state­ment was not meant as an in­di­ca­tion that he in­tend­ed to re­duce the Health Min­istry's al­lo­ca­tion.

He said, "Yes­ter­day, in Par­lia­ment, I sought ap­proval to IN­CREASE ex­pen­di­ture on health care by $495 mil­lion to a to­tal of $8 bil­lion in 2024 and said that we must now en­sure that we get val­ue for mon­ey. The me­dia twist­ed my words to mean I wish to re­duce ex­pen­di­ture on health."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored