JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, April 1, 2025

Two Venezue­lan gov­ern­ment rep­re­sen­ta­tives:

Blame ExxonMobil for Essequibo flare-up

...Prof An­tho­ny Bryan says don’t blame Big Oil

by

Raphael John-Lall
488 days ago
20231130

Raphael John-Lall

Two Venezue­lan gov­ern­ment rep­re­sen­ta­tives in its Na­tion­al As­sem­bly, Wills Rangel and Ja­cobo Tor­res are ac­cus­ing US en­er­gy gi­ant Exxon­Mo­bil of stok­ing the ten­sions that cur­rent­ly ex­ist be­tween Guyana and Venezuela.

They were al­so backed by the Oil­fields Work­ers’ Trade Union (OW­TU).

Rangel and Tor­res are al­so Venezue­lan labour lead­ers and mem­bers of the rul­ing So­cial­ist Par­ty (PSUV),spoke on Mon­day night at a fo­rum on the ter­ri­to­r­i­al dis­pute be­tween Venezuela and Guyana host­ed by the Cipri­ani Col­lege of Labour and Co-op­er­a­tive Stud­ies, Val­sayn.

The dis­cus­sion sparked in­ter­est with al­most 300 on­line view­ers join­ing the vir­tu­al fo­rum on the Col­lege’s YouTube chan­nel, a sharp in­crease from nor­mal vir­tu­al view­er­ship.

On De­cem­ber 3, Venezue­lans will go to the polls in a non-bind­ing pub­lic ref­er­en­dum to in­di­cate if they agree with their gov­ern­ment’s po­si­tion to in­cor­po­rate the dis­put­ed Es­se­qui­bo ter­ri­to­ry as part of Venezuela, re­name the state Guayana Es­e­qui­ba, and grant its pop­u­la­tion, cur­rent­ly Guyana na­tion­als, Venezue­lan cit­i­zen­ship.

On Tues­day, Guardian Me­dia called Ex­on­n­Mo­bil’s of­fice in Guyana ask­ing for a com­ment on the Venezue­lan dis­pute with Guyana and sent an email but up to press time, they had not an­swered the calls or the email.

With re­gard to Exxon­Mo­bil’s op­er­a­tions in Guyana, the web­site “Off­shore En­er­gy” quot­ed Liam Mal­lon, Pres­i­dent of Exxon­Mo­bil Up­stream Com­pa­ny as say­ing: “Each new project sup­ports eco­nom­ic de­vel­op­ment and ac­cess to re­sources that will ben­e­fit Guyanese com­mu­ni­ties while al­so help­ing to meet the world’s en­er­gy de­mand. We’re pleased to work in part­ner­ship with the Guyanese Gov­ern­ment to make re­li­able en­er­gy ac­ces­si­ble and sus­tain­able.”

Off­shore En­er­gy, in the ar­ti­cle dat­ed No­vem­ber 14, 2023, added that Exxon­Mo­bil has start­ed pro­duc­tion from its third oil de­vel­op­ment at the Stabroek block off­shore Guyana, boost­ing to­tal pro­duc­tion ca­pac­i­ty in the coun­try to ap­prox­i­mate­ly 620,000 bar­rels per day.

Venezuela’s an­tag­o­nis­tic re­la­tion­ship with Exxon­Mo­bil goes back 16 years as in 2007, Venezuela na­tion­alised Exxon­Mo­bil’s oil projects in Venezuela.

Exxon­Mo­bil orig­i­nal­ly filed the ar­bi­tra­tion case against Venezuela in 2008 over the Cer­ro Ne­gro Project, which was a joint ven­ture, un­til the Venezue­lan Gov­ern­ment took over Exxon­Mo­bil’s 42 per cent in­ter­est in June 2007.

In 2014, a World Bank ar­bi­tra­tion tri­bunal or­dered Venezuela to pay Exxon Mo­bil Corp about US$1.6 bil­lion to com­pen­sate for the 2007 oil na­tion­al­i­sa­tion.

Rangel who is the Pres­i­dent of the Bo­li­var­i­an So­cial­ist Work­ers’ Cen­tral (CB­ST) and a mem­ber of the Venezue­lan Na­tion­al As­sem­bly gave a re­cap of the bro­ken re­la­tion­ship with the oil and gas gi­ant and ac­cused it of flam­ing the al­ready ex­ist­ing bad re­la­tion­ship with Guyana.

“Venezuela’s Gov­ern­ment de­cid­ed to na­tion­alise Exxon­Mo­bil’s in­ter­ests. Exxon­Mo­bil then sued Venezuela for US$14 bil­lion dol­lars and it was a de­mand of the Unit­ed States.”

In re­la­tion to oth­er ac­cu­sa­tions against Venezuela, he said the coun­try has ob­served that some in­ter­na­tion­al pow­ers are try­ing to un­der­mine Venezuela’s Petro­Caribe ini­tia­tive which al­lows Venezuela to sell oil to Caribbean coun­tries be­low mar­ket prices.

“This is a tool of in­te­gra­tion cre­at­ed by Com­man­der Hugo Chavez to help the Caribbean peo­ple. Some coun­tries have a lim­it­ed au­ton­o­my in terms of their fu­el but with Petro­Caribe they ex­tend­ed the num­ber of days they could ob­tain oil. Many Caribbean coun­tries were free from pres­sure from in­ter­na­tion­al oil cor­po­ra­tions like Exxon­Mo­bil and they ex­er­cised pres­sure on some Caribbean na­tions. Exxon­Mo­bil has been su­ing Venezuela be­fore in­ter­na­tion­al or­gan­i­sa­tions for 15 years just be­cause the Venezue­lan gov­ern­ment man­ages our oil re­serves in an in­de­pen­dent way. Through the Petro­Caribe project, we al­so of­fer the Caribbean coun­tries our oil to free them from the colo­nial yoke im­posed for over 500 years.”

He added some Caribbean coun­tries are suf­fer­ing from an “en­er­gy cri­sis” and they wish they could ac­cess Venezuela’s low­er-than-mar­ket price oil. How­ev­er, they are afraid of the de­vel­oped coun­tries and their multi­na­tion­al com­pa­nies.

Tor­res, who al­so spoke at the fo­rum on Mon­day night, is as well a mem­ber of the Venezue­lan Na­tion­al As­sem­bly (Venezue­lan Par­lia­ment) rep­re­sent­ing work­ers, mem­ber of the Vice-Pres­i­den­cy of the PSUV and In­ter­na­tion­al Co­or­di­na­tor of the Bo­li­var­i­an So­cial­ist Con­fed­er­a­tion of Work­ers (CB­ST).

He said that Venezuela’s oil re­sources are not just to earn rev­enue but al­so to help the poor in Venezuela and the Caribbean re­gion.

“It is not just an in­come or a way to raise rev­enue, it is a way to de­vel­op our peo­ple. We took away the com­mer­cial char­ac­ter and trans­formed it in­to the so­cial de­vel­op­ment of our peo­ple.”

Lo­cal trade unions

Speak­ing dur­ing the ques­tion and an­swer seg­ment of the fo­rum the OW­TU’s ed­u­ca­tion and re­search of­fice, Ozzi War­wick, con­demned multi­na­tion­als like Exxon­Mo­bil for its al­leged in­volve­ment in the Venezue­lan and Guyanese land con­tro­ver­sy.

“This is­sue has less to do with a ter­ri­to­r­i­al dis­pute and more to do with the role of multi­na­tion­al cor­po­ra­tions in desta­bil­is­ing and fu­el­ing con­flict. We should not ig­nore or take for grant­ed the role of Exxon­Mo­bil in fu­el­ing this con­flict and the role of for­eign em­pires. For most of our colo­nial his­to­ry, this re­gion was a zone of war and ex­treme vi­o­lence with slav­ery and in­den­ture­ship feulled by Eu­ro­pean em­pires. Now as in­de­pen­dent na­tion states we should not al­low our­selves to be ma­nip­u­lat­ed by for­eign cap­i­tal and multi­na­tion­al en­ter­pris­es. We must hold to this re­gion be­ing a zone of peace,” said War­wick, who is al­so gen­er­al sec­re­tary of the Joint Trade Union Move­ment

He al­so called on oth­er Cari­com coun­tries to pro­tect the peace the re­gion en­joys.

“We have to do every­thing pos­si­ble to pre­serve that peace. There­fore, di­a­logue is cru­cial and the par­ties must talk in­ter­na­tion­al re­la­tions when there are con­flict­ing par­ties. I think we heard it very clear­ly; Venezuela wants to talk.”

Don’t blame Exxon­Mo­bil

Prof An­tho­ny Bryan, who is a co-founder of the Caribbean Pol­i­cy Con­sor­tium (cpc­caribbean.org), pro­fes­sor emer­i­tus at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Mi­a­mi, and a for­mer di­rec­tor of the In­sti­tute of In­ter­na­tion­al Re­la­tions at UWI, St. Au­gus­tine, told the Busi­ness Guardian that that Exxon­Mo­bil should not be blamed for the lat­est flare up be­tween Venezuela and Guyana.

“I do not think that the in­ter­na­tion­al oil com­pa­nies have any role in stir­ring up trou­ble be­tween Guyana and Venezuela. Their in­ter­est is in oil pro­duc­tion re­gard­less of which na­tion it be­longs to. Blam­ing the oil com­pa­nies seems use­less. It pays to re­mem­ber that the com­pa­nies, like na­tion states, do not have friends, they have in­ter­ests!”

He added that Pres­i­dent Nico­las Maduro’s lat­est round of “sabre-rat­tling” be­gan af­ter Guyana launched its first ever com­pet­i­tive oil block auc­tion in De­cem­ber 2022.

“The spec­tac­u­lar suc­cess of Exxon­Mo­bil and To­tal­En­er­gies does pro­voke some an­i­mos­i­ty on the part of Maduro. It’s dif­fi­cult to un­der­stand why since Venezuela al­ready has the largest oil re­serves on the plan­et. It’s just con­ve­nient to blame the com­pa­nies”

Bryan al­so does not think that there will be armed con­flict be­tween Guyana and Venezuela.

“I doubt there will be any full-scale armed con­flict. There is a lot of ‘sabre-rat­tling’ by Pres­i­dent Maduro who is seek­ing to so­lid­i­fy his pow­er for the up­com­ing elec­tions. Oth­er pres­i­dents in the past have used Es­se­qui­bo as a po­lit­i­cal tool to whip up na­tion­al­ism in their favour at elec­tion time. He is just the lat­est al­though he is push­ing the en­ve­lope more than his pre­de­ces­sors have done.”

He al­so said it would be lo­gis­ti­cal­ly dif­fi­cult for the Venezue­lan army to in­vade Guyana.

“It would be very dif­fi­cult for Venezuela to try a land in­va­sion. The fea­si­ble route to the Es­se­qui­bo is through Ro­raima but the Brazil­ian mil­i­tary sta­tioned there is a strong de­ter­rent to any Venezue­lan mil­i­tary pas­sage. Maduro is try­ing to por­tray Venezuela as the vic­tim and the un­der­dog, but the US, Brazil, the Com­mon­wealth, and oth­ers across the globe are sup­port­ive of Guyana. So, a mil­i­tary in­cur­sion would have dire con­se­quences for Venezuela.”

Fi­nal­ly, he does not think that the con­flict will im­pact T&T’s and Venezuela’s re­cent en­er­gy agree­ments.

“I do not see any im­pact on T&T and on the Drag­on gas agree­ment with Venezuela. They are two sep­a­rate mat­ters. The Venezue­lans are aware of T&T’s sup­port for the Cari­com po­si­tion on Guyana. Of­ten pol­i­tics can trump eco­nom­ics, but I do not see it in this case. The Drag­on agree­ment is too valu­able for both Venezuela and T&T. I am sure that trade, busi­ness, and cul­tur­al re­la­tions will con­tin­ue as be­fore.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored