JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, March 9, 2025

Some gyms hiking workout fees

by

Jesse Ramdeo
430 days ago
20240104

Se­nior Re­porter

jesse.ramdeo@cnc3.co.tt

The in­creas­ing weight of op­er­a­tional costs and oth­er fac­tors has forced ma­jor com­mer­cial gyms to flex their fi­nan­cial mus­cles by in­creas­ing mem­ber­ship fees.

Gym own­ers say as the fit­ness in­dus­try evolves, time­ly steps to sus­tain the ser­vices have be­come nec­es­sary.

The peo­ple who have made New Year’s res­o­lu­tions, promis­ing them­selves “New Year, New Me” will, in some cas­es, now have to pay up to $50 ad­di­tion­al to sculpt their im­proved physique or ob­tain six-pack abs that have been elu­sive for years.

From as far back as last month to as re­cent as Tues­day pop­u­lar gyms in­clud­ing Evo­lu­tion Fit­ness, Raw Fit­ness and Health club, Health and Fit­ness gyms, Cen­tral Ath­let­ic Club, CLX Gyms and the Bar By The Beast gym have all pushed up their prices.

Man­ag­ing di­rec­tor of the Bar By The Beast gym in Grand Bazaar, Kahlil Ram­sub­hag ex­plained that ab­sorb­ing op­er­a­tional costs have been weigh­ing them down.

As such, the move to ad­just mem­ber­ship fees had to be tak­en, Ram­sub­hag said dur­ing an in­ter­view with Guardian Me­dia on Tues­day.

“Us­ing our stan­dard mem­ber­ship prices, right now we are at $399 and our in­crease will take us to $445. A lot of com­ments that we’re see­ing on so­cial me­dia have made it seem as though this was a de­ci­sion that was tak­en light­ly, that it was a de­ci­sion just to in­crease prof­its but that is not the case.”

Based on the state­ments is­sued, in­creas­es in op­er­a­tional costs ap­peared to be the biggest fac­tor be­hind the mem­ber­ship fee ad­just­ment, ac­cord­ing to a no­tice shared by Cen­tral Ath­let­ic Club.

The mem­ber­ship in­crease which took ef­fect on Mon­day was as a re­sult of “an es­ca­la­tion in prices in our ma­te­ri­als and over­head costs over the last few years”.

A state­ment from CLX Gym pro­vid­ing an up­date to cus­tomers in­di­cat­ed that “de­spite our on­go­ing ef­forts which in­clude ab­sorb­ing the men­tioned in­creas­es, the cur­rent cir­cum­stances in­di­cate that we can­not sus­tain our ex­ist­ing op­er­a­tional cost struc­ture.”

Ram­sub­hag said the de­ci­sion to in­crease mem­ber­ship fees were not sole­ly linked to the “gains” and that it re­flect­ed the in­vest­ments re­quired for the fit­ness in­dus­try.

He said, “Post COVID, what hap­pened is we saw an in­crease in our gen­er­al main­te­nance. Gen­er­al main­te­nance would be the clean­ing of the fa­cil­i­ty and main­te­nance of it. How­ev­er, post COVID we had to in­sti­tute a lot of more strin­gent clean­ing sys­tems and it meant that there was an in­creased cost cou­pled with it.

“We al­so had a lot of con­sum­ables that were be­ing utilised. It’s al­so the same with gym equip­ment and the main­te­nance of gym equip­ment, which in­clude com­mer­cial pieces. They aren’t the tread­mills you have in your house; this is com­mer­cial equip­ment that re­quire spe­cialised parts and ser­vices.”

But even with the tra­di­tion­al surge for those seek­ing to get their bod­ies in Car­ni­val shape, Ram­sub­hag said he ex­pect­ed to see shifts in turnout.

“We ex­pect there to be a lit­tle bit of un­cer­tain­ty in terms of the in­crease in price. We try to be as trans­par­ent as we could with our clien­tèle in terms of ex­plain­ing the rea­sons for the in­creas­es. It is not on­ly gym fa­cil­i­ties faced with this bur­den, a lot of busi­ness­es have to re­struc­ture their prices to be eco­nom­i­cal­ly vi­able.”

Busi­ness groups had pre­vi­ous­ly warned that a tough new year await­ed the pub­lic, as some say they will have no choice but to pass the elec­tric­i­ty rate in­crease on­to their cus­tomers.

While “Com­mer­cial B1 Cus­tomers” will see the per­cent­age in­crease in their bills re­duced from the pre­vi­ous range of around 51 per cent to 63 per cent to a range of 37 per cent to 51 per cent, oth­er com­mer­cial cus­tomers will see an in­crease be­tween 10 per cent to 11 per cent.

The Reg­u­lat­ed In­dus­tries Com­mis­sion (RIC) ex­plained last year that B1 cus­tomers are usu­al­ly small to mid-size en­ter­pris­es (SMEs) with a low­er con­sump­tion than larg­er busi­ness­es, how­ev­er, San Juan Busi­ness As­so­ci­a­tion (SJ­BA) pres­i­dent Ibrahim Ali said any ad­di­tion­al in­creas­es in op­er­a­tional costs will have a se­ri­ous ef­fect on busi­ness­es that are al­ready reel­ing from oth­er ex­ter­nal pres­sures.

To­ba­go Cham­ber of In­dus­try and Com­merce (TCIC) chair­man Cur­tis Williams, said there were con­cerns that land­lords will be rais­ing rent for busi­ness ten­ants.

Williams ques­tioned the tim­ing of the in­crease and if it will have the de­sired im­pact.

Some gym own­ers and op­er­a­tors al­so at­trib­uted the in­crease in mem­ber­ship fees to in­creas­es in their rental fees, and with prop­er­ty tax set to roll out there were con­cerns about its im­pact on op­er­at­ing costs.

Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert had pre­vi­ous­ly as­sured that Prop­er­ty Tax will com­mence from Jan­u­ary 1, 2024.

“We do in­tend to col­lect prop­er­ty tax in 2024…I want peo­ple to un­der­stand that prop­er­ty tax is ap­plic­a­ble from Jan­u­ary 1, 2024.”

Last week Im­bert is­sued a state­ment clar­i­fy­ing Prop­er­ty Tax “mis­in­for­ma­tion”.

“It is to be not­ed that by law, on­ly the Board of In­land Rev­enue can no­ti­fy tax­pay­ers re­gard­ing the amount of prop­er­ty tax they are re­quired to pay, while the Val­u­a­tion Di­vi­sion is sole­ly re­spon­si­ble for de­ter­min­ing the an­nu­al rental val­ue of prop­er­ties to al­low the BIR to cal­cu­late the prop­er­ty tax,” he said.

“The Prop­er­ty Tax payable is, in fact, on­ly 2.7 per cent of the An­nu­al Rental Val­ue stat­ed in the No­tices of Val­u­a­tion. So, if a res­i­den­tial prop­er­ty has been as­sessed at an an­nu­al rental val­ue of $60,000, the tax payable is $1,620 per year or $135 per month. If a prop­er­ty has been as­sessed at an an­nu­al rental val­ue of $18,000, the tax payable is $486 or $40.50 per month,” Min­is­ter Im­bert ex­plained. He al­so point­ed out that the prop­er­ty tax for more than 60 per cent of all prop­er­ties in T&T will be be­tween $486.00 per year ($40.50 per month) and $1,620 per year ($135 per month).


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored