JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 15, 2025

We must demand accountability

by

Curtis Williams
1206 days ago
20211124

Cur­tis Williams

Are we as a so­ci­ety as­pi­ra­tional? Do we think that T&T could one day emerge from its present state and be what the late Prime Min­is­ter Dr Er­ic Williams called a mod­el na­tion?

To do that I feel re­quires a shift in cul­ture that must start with av­er­age cit­i­zens de­mand­ing that we want bet­ter for our­selves, that we are not pre­pared to set­tle for things that we know are un­ac­cept­able and that we must hold all in lead­er­ship roles to ac­count. No­tice I said all. Not just politi­cians.

There must be a burn­ing de­sire for jus­tice, for ac­count­abil­i­ty and for high qual­i­ty per­for­mance.

I will ad­mit that this is a tall or­der, if not a near im­pos­si­ble task, be­cause it would re­quire the over­throw of a sys­tem de­signed to al­low for some to prof­it at the ex­pense of the great ma­jor­i­ty of oth­ers.

Every­where we turn there is strong ev­i­dence of this and for many the bur­den is so much that the al­ter­na­tive is to shrug one’s shoul­der and move on and, in some cas­es, mi­grate away from the prob­lems.

Let us take health­care for ex­am­ple. I read with great in­ter­est the de­mand by Health Min­is­ter Ter­rence Deyals­ingh that Guardian colum­nist Ira Math­ur pro­duce ev­i­dence of peo­ple wait­ing be­tween one to three days for a bed at the pub­lic hos­pi­tals.

That the Min­is­ter of Health could so brazen­ly pre­tend he does not know this to be true shows he is ei­ther out of touch with his port­fo­lio or he prefers to plead the fifth rather than con­front a prob­lem that cit­i­zens, or­di­nary cit­i­zens, should not come to ac­cept as the way it is in the pub­lic health­care sys­tem, but rather that we are not will­ing to have a sys­tem that treats cit­i­zens in this way, at their most vul­ner­a­ble mo­ments.

Health­care is ex­pen­sive and the gov­ern­ment can­not on its own af­ford a first-class health­care sys­tem with­out the as­sis­tance of its cit­i­zens. It can­not pay for it from the trea­sury and must have some kind of health in­sur­ance sys­tem that will re­move some of the bur­den from the trea­sury. The gov­ern­ment knows this. They have the stud­ies, they have heard and know of Pro­fes­sor Karl Theodore’s work, but they will not im­ple­ment it. To do so would re­quire ex­pend­ing po­lit­i­cal cap­i­tal, a wean­ing of the so­ci­ety from the no­tion that health­care is free or that health sur­charge is a re­al tax for health­care.

The pro­vide an ef­fi­cient pub­lic health sys­tem will hurt the pock­ets of some of the pri­vate health in­sti­tu­tions. Stud­ies have shown that over $5 bil­lion is spent an­nu­al­ly in the pri­vate health sec­tor, one of the true growth ar­eas in a time of eco­nom­ic con­trac­tion.

Yes the pri­vate sec­tor ben­e­fits from the present sys­tem that tells you it is okay to wait years for some surg­eries or vis­it the doc­tors in their pri­vate prac­tice since the ur­gency is not there in the pub­lic sec­tor. In oth­er words, the will­ing­ness to ac­cept the sys­tem is what it is, will not lead to change and would like­ly leave us worse off over time.

This is no dif­fer­ent with the Wa­ter and Sew­er­age Au­thor­i­ty. That WASA con­tin­ues to lose over 50 per cent of its wa­ter in 2021 when in 1993 the late Prime Min­is­ter Patrick Man­ning made the same ob­ser­va­tion while invit­ing Sev­ern Trent to pro­vide man­age­ment sup­port to the au­thor­i­ty. This is an ex­am­ple of what I am speak­ing of.

Al­most three decades lat­er, bil­lions of dol­lars spent and we have lit­tle net im­prove­ment to show for it. But we con­tin­ue to ac­cept that wa­ter two days a week is okay, truck borne wa­ter can work and it does not lead the pub­lic to de­mand bet­ter. It is not seen as a na­tion­al pri­or­i­ty the way we ap­pear to have as a na­tion­al pri­or­i­ty the con­struc­tion of high­ways.

I am not in any­way knock­ing high­way con­struc­tion, I think it can po­ten­tial­ly lead to eco­nom­ic ex­pan­sion as it im­proves con­nec­tiv­i­ty among com­mu­ni­ties, im­proves ef­fi­cien­cy and re­duces time on the road. It al­so makes it eas­i­er to get to com­mu­ni­ties not lo­cat­ed close to the main towns and may al­low peo­ple to live fur­ther away from the town and cities and still keep their jobs. But is there not some­thing wrong with the con­stant need to pave and repave the na­tion’s roads which by the ad­mis­sion of the Works and Trans­port Min­is­ter Ro­han Sinanan are in poor con­di­tion?

Is it our imag­i­na­tion that roads should last be­tween ten and 15 years be­fore hav­ing to be repaved? Is the prob­lem on­ly WASA, is it poor con­struc­tion with a lack of drainage? What does it say about our con­trac­tors or en­gi­neer­ing? What does it say about how we val­ue our tax­pay­ers dol­lars? In short are we hav­ing the right kind of con­ver­sa­tions as a coun­try? Are we as­pir­ing to hav­ing a first class coun­try, where we don’t have to fo­cus so much on the next pot­hole and could pay more at­ten­tion to the rest of road users?

It is the same ques­tion I ask about the time the Min­is­ter of Fi­nance is pre­pared to spend on Twit­ter try­ing to pre­tend that the Moody’s down­grade should not be fo­cused on by the me­dia and oth­ers be­cause the IMF is pre­dict­ing growth of over five per cent in the next fis­cal year.

If the Min­is­ter is hon­est and if we were hav­ing se­ri­ous dis­cus­sions he would ad­mit that both the IMF and Moody’s point to an econ­o­my al­most com­plete­ly re­liant on en­er­gy prices and pro­duc­tion. An econ­o­my that has se­ri­ous down­side risks and one that he has failed over six years to di­ver­si­fy.

Both Moody’s and the IMF recog­nise that the coun­try’s forex po­si­tion has to be ad­just­ed and that the stance of seek­ing to de­fend the TT dol­lar at all cost is not sus­tain­able.

What we must be dis­cussing is how do we tru­ly di­ver­si­fy the econ­o­my. We must build on the pos­i­tive moves be­ing made in the Tourism and Agri­cul­ture sec­tors. We must not take our eyes off fix­ing the en­er­gy sec­tor in­clud­ing bold moves like the one made to get the Man­a­tee field go­ing. We must de­mand ac­count­abil­i­ty. We must de­mand a re­turn to plans and tar­gets in the way we man­age the coun­try’s econ­o­my.

We must de­mand bet­ter!


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored