JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Attorney calls for more clarity on self-defence

by

Anna-Lisa Paul
565 days ago
20230803
Attorney Om Lalla

Attorney Om Lalla

One at­tor­ney is say­ing that the law of self-de­fence al­lows cit­i­zens to use rea­son­able force to de­fend them­selves if un­der at­tack.

And while each case must be con­sid­ered on its own mer­it, if the po­lice con­sid­er the force to be ex­ces­sive, a per­son can face crim­i­nal charges and the brunt of the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem.

At­tor­ney Om Lal­la yes­ter­day ar­gued that the pub­lic need­ed to be aware of the pos­si­ble ram­i­fi­ca­tions for self-de­fence.

Un­will­ing to com­ment on any spe­cif­ic sit­u­a­tion but of­fer­ing gen­er­alised knowl­edge, he said, “It is be­com­ing very wor­ry­ing at a time when peo­ple are ter­ri­fied in their homes ... what are their le­gal rights in terms of how they should de­fend them­selves,” he said.

Fo­cus­ing on li­cenced firearm users, their pow­ers, their re­spon­si­bil­i­ties, and know­ing when to use the firearm, Lal­la ex­plained, “Very of­ten when a li­cenced firearm user draws his firearm or fires, he is the sub­ject of a se­ri­ous in­ves­ti­ga­tion to de­ter­mine if he act­ed prop­er­ly or whether he erred in the way he used this firearm. So while there are calls for peo­ple to use their guns, the pub­lic and li­cenced firearm hold­ers have to al­so un­der­stand that there is a heavy bur­den placed on a li­cenced firearm hold­er when you use your firearm.”

In­di­cat­ing that in al­most all the cas­es in which li­cenced firearms are used, they are re­tained by the po­lice when they are dis­charged re­gard­less of the cir­cum­stances.

Lal­la said the po­lice were the fi­nal ad­ju­di­ca­tors to de­ter­mine if charges should be laid “based on how they view the facts”.

Claim­ing the law was still very ar­cha­ic in terms of how mat­ters were treat­ed, he said in in­stances where rea­son­able force was used and leads to mur­der, manslaugh­ter and/or shoot­ing with in­tent, it could take be­tween five and ten years for a de­ter­mi­na­tion.

He sug­gest­ed an im­me­di­ate mea­sure to bring clar­i­ty to the on­go­ing pub­lic de­bate.

“There must be di­a­logue with the po­lice, the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions, and li­cenced firearm hold­ers as to what their rights and re­spon­si­bil­i­ties are,” Lal­la said.

Lal­la said the po­lice need­ed to spell out the var­i­ous cir­cum­stances in which li­cenced firearm users can in fact use their weapon, whilst si­mul­ta­ne­ous­ly avoid­ing a breach of the law.

Look­ing at the cur­rent land­scape and tak­ing in­to ac­count the pub­lic fear of crime, he stat­ed, “The coun­try is al­ready in a very ner­vous state and peo­ple re­act to save lives.”

On the is­sue of li­cenced firearm users’ rel­a­tives us­ing/han­dling their weapons, he said this was an­oth­er dis­cus­sion that had to be thor­ough­ly ven­ti­lat­ed among all rel­e­vant agen­cies and as­so­ci­a­tions be­fore any amend­ments to the ex­ist­ing laws could be made.

Re­gard­ing how le­gal is­sues as well as the gen­er­al crime sit­u­a­tion have be­come po­lit­i­cal foot­balls, Lal­la said, “Mat­ters of na­tion­al se­cu­ri­ty must al­ways be treat­ed very re­spon­si­bly on both sides.”

He said, “There is no de­bate about it, it is very clear. We have an un­con­trol­lable crime rate where most of the vic­tims are law-abid­ing cit­i­zens. Our home in­va­sion rate is alarm­ing­ly high and we need to ad­dress how we pro­tect the cit­i­zens by giv­ing them rel­e­vant in­for­ma­tion that they can deal with it.”

TTPS: 110 ar­rest­ed

for home in­va­sions

One hun­dred and ten peo­ple have been ar­rest­ed over the last eight months in con­nec­tion with re­ports of home in­va­sions.

This is ac­cord­ing to the T&T Po­lice Ser­vice (TTPS) who yes­ter­day as­sured that they would con­tin­ue to in­ten­si­fy ef­forts to re­store safe­ty and se­cu­ri­ty across the coun­try.

At­tribut­ing the ar­rests to strate­gies adopt­ed by Po­lice Com­mis­sion­er Er­la Hare­wood-Christo­pher, the TTPS said dur­ing the pe­ri­od Jan­u­ary to Ju­ly 2023, there was a re­duc­tion in se­ri­ous crimes across the ten polic­ing di­vi­sions, com­pared to the same pe­ri­od in 2022.

They point­ed to the cre­ation of a spe­cial team of of­fi­cers as the dri­ving force be­hind it. This team in­cludes of­fi­cers from the West­ern Di­vi­sion Crim­i­nal In­ves­ti­ga­tions De­part­ment and Gang Unit; the Port-of-Spain Di­vi­sion and North­ern Di­vi­sion Gang Units; as well as of­fi­cers from the South­ern, Cen­tral and South West­ern Di­vi­sions led by ACP Crim­i­nal Di­vi­sion, Kent Ghisyawan.

The TTPS al­so spoke about in­creased pa­trols and the use of in­tel­li­gence as well as co­op­er­a­tion from the pub­lic.

The TTPS al­so quot­ed from the Firearms Act, Chap­ter 16:01, Sec­tion 6 (1), as they re­mind­ed, “A per­son may have in his pos­ses­sion a firearm or am­mu­ni­tion on­ly if he holds a Firearm User’s Li­cence (FUL) with re­spect to such firearm or am­mu­ni­tion.”

Sec­tion 6 (3) of the act states, “Any per­son who con­tra­venes any of the pro­vi­sions of this sec­tion is li­able in the case of—(a) an of­fence un­der sub­sec­tion (1)—(i) on sum­ma­ry con­vic­tion to a fine of $15,000 and to im­pris­on­ment for eight years; or (ii) on con­vic­tion on in­dict­ment to im­pris­on­ment for 15 years.”

The TTPS urged, “FUL hold­ers are there­fore urged to fol­low the pro­vi­sions of the law at all times as it re­lates to the pos­ses­sion and dis­charge of firearms.”

Sec­tion 11 (1) of the act states, “A per­son who dis­charges a firearm or am­mu­ni­tion on or with­in forty me­ters of any pub­lic road or in any pub­lic place, is li­able on sum­ma­ry con­vic­tion to a fine of $15,000, ex­cept where he does so—(a) in the law­ful pro­tec­tion of his per­son or prop­er­ty or of the per­son or prop­er­ty of some oth­er per­son.”

Mean­while, the Po­lice Ser­vice has al­so en­cour­aged home­own­ers to keep their homes, prop­er­ties and pos­ses­sion prop­er­ly se­cured.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored