A cross-section of the business community, including the Trinidad and Tobago Manufacturers’ Association (TTMA), Trinidad and Tobago Association of Retired Persons (TTARP) and Ernst and Young, say they agree with Government’s proposal to increase the retirement age, but there are also recommendations for the State to turn its attention to errant business owners who fail to pay national insurance for staff.
During his 2024 Budget presentation on Monday, Finance Minister Colm Imbert revealed that the Government will be pressing ahead with its plan to increase the retirement age from the current 60 years to 65.
Once the proposal takes effect, employees will have the option to work for five more years before they tap into the National Insurance Retirement Benefit (NIB). Currently, individuals who make a minimum of 750 contributions earn a payout of $3,000 per month from the fund. With the population living longer, the fund has reduced significantly, and the Government is attempting to close the gap.
Speaking at the TTMA’s post-budget discussion at the Hyatt Regency Hotel yesterday, president Roger Roach said while the Government must take steps to ensure the longevity of the fund, the State should also turn its attention to businesses that are failing to pay NIS for staff.
“The net is not wide enough in terms of NIS contributions like tax collections. You have a number of businesses who are not making those NIS contributions on behalf of their employees. They’ve fallen below the radar and if the net is widened and you get contributions from more businesses, more individuals, then that could help to plug the gap,” Roach said.
Imbert, who also spoke at the event, agreed with the suggestion, as he said the Government is not getting the full allocation of taxes from a workforce that teeters around 600,000. He said just 400,000 people are religiously paying NIS.
“So where are those 200,000 people? It’s something that we have to deal with,” Imbert said.
Also contacted, TTARP executive member Reynold Cooper welcomed the move but said it should not be a mandatory decision. He added that the State should also assure that young people do not suffer the consequence of this move.
“It should be optional and not compulsory. On the other hand, too, we also believe that there should be some way to develop the economy, to grow the economy, so that younger persons should be able to find employment. Because what we don’t want happening, is that an elderly person is depriving a younger person from doing some work,” Cooper said.
Meanwhile, some members of the public agreed while others found the increase in the retirement age a backward initiative.
Barataria resident Janice Joseph, 66, who was an assistant at the Ministry of Labour, said she would have worked longer if she had the option.
“The five years more is not bad because sometimes, right, yuh still in yuh prime, yuh still vibrant. I wish I was still working but I had to go. They need us to train the younger ones to come up to mark. So, raising the NIS? Eh eh, we money too small for that,” she said.
However, June Edwards, 83, disagreed with the proposal. She said people who have devoted years to work would likely appreciate the downtime.
“No, I would not like to work. When I reach my 60 I want to leave. It could be a good choice if yuh reach 60 and relax yourself at home after getting up every morning early,” she said.
Annette Alexander, 73, who spray-painted vehicles before she retired, shared a similar view. She said not everyone would be able-bodied at that age.
“From the time you turn 50, you start getting ailments – sugar, pressure, heart. So, at that case now, how a person with these things could work? Let them give the people they money, they national insurance on time and they pension, because this is what they’re breaksing from,” she said.