JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, May 9, 2025

Fake cops causing real problems due to easy access to tactical wear

by

Shane Superville
200 days ago
20241021

Shane Su­perville

Se­nior Re­porter

shane.su­perville@guardian.co.tt

 

In less than a month, there have been three in­ci­dents where peo­ple were kid­napped or killed by crim­i­nals wear­ing po­lice op­er­a­tional wear. For the year so far, there have been at least nine in­ci­dents where crim­i­nals dis­guised as po­lice of­fi­cers com­mit­ted rob­beries, as­saults, kid­nap­pings, and even mur­ders.

The trend of crim­i­nals im­per­son­at­ing po­lice of­fi­cers is not new, as po­lice op­er­a­tional kits have been dis­cov­ered among il­le­gal arms and am­mu­ni­tion dur­ing raids for years.

In the most re­cent in­ci­dent on Oc­to­ber 8, po­lice found and seized two po­lice jack­ets, a pair of tac­ti­cal trousers, caps, a po­lice bul­let­proof vest, and strobe lights.

In May, the uni­forms of three of­fi­cers as­signed to the Guard and Emer­gency Branch (GEB) were stolen from their lock­ers at the Prime Min­is­ter’s of­fi­cial res­i­dence in St Ann’s. As of Thurs­day af­ter­noon, no one was ar­rest­ed for the theft, as the mat­ter is still be­ing in­ves­ti­gat­ed.

Dur­ing a po­lice me­dia brief­ing on Thurs­day, DCP Op­er­a­tions Ju­nior Ben­jamin an­nounced that on­ly the Guard and Emer­gency Branch (GEB), the In­ter Agency Task Force (IATF), the Na­tion­al Op­er­a­tion Task Force (NOTF), and the Mul­ti Op­er­a­tional Po­lice Sec­tion (MOPs) were al­lowed to wear tac­ti­cal uni­forms.

As he read from a TTPS mem­o­ran­dum that was is­sued that af­ter­noon, Ben­jamin said of­fi­cers as­signed to di­vi­sions, branch sec­tions, and units were re­quired to wear their grey and blue uni­forms. Ben­jamin added that op­er­a­tional uni­forms pre­vi­ous­ly used by di­vi­sions should be re­turned to the po­lice ser­vice but could not say ex­act­ly how many uni­forms were ex­pect­ed to be re­ceived.

How­ev­er, the avail­abil­i­ty of op­er­a­tional wear through lo­cal re­tail­ers and pri­vate se­cu­ri­ty com­pa­nies means that even with­out hav­ing to bor­row or steal le­git­i­mate po­lice uni­forms, crim­i­nals can ac­cess cloth­ing that is con­vinc­ing enough to de­ceive the pub­lic.

Tac­ti­cal kits or Bat­tle Dress Uni­forms (BDUs) are sold at se­cu­ri­ty sup­ply stores and even road­side ven­dors in cer­tain ar­eas. It may cost ban­dits as lit­tle as $1,000 to look the part of a po­lice of­fi­cer. This price cov­ers the cost of the BDU, com­bat boots, shoul­der patch­es, and a cap.

Re­spond­ing to ques­tions from Op­po­si­tion MP Roodal Mooni­lal dur­ing a Joint Se­lect Com­mit­tee sit­ting in Jan­u­ary, Po­lice Com­mis­sion­er Er­la Hare­wood-Christo­pher said she was con­cerned over the trend of crim­i­nals mas­querad­ing as po­lice of­fi­cers, not­ing that of­fi­cers were asked to wear their grey and blue uni­forms to­geth­er with their of­fi­cial TTPS badges.

She not­ed, how­ev­er, that the po­lice op­er­a­tional wear or cloth­ing sim­i­lar in ap­pear­ance was sold at re­tail­ers across T&T and sought the Gov­ern­ment’s sup­port in clamp­ing down on this prac­tice.

How­ev­er, com­mit­tee chair­man Kei­th Scot­land, now Min­is­ter in the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty, not­ed that the unau­tho­rised use of po­lice uni­forms, like cam­ou­flage cloth­ing, was pro­hib­it­ed.

“You don’t need any in­ter­ven­tion. Charge ... If there is a chal­lenge, that’s why there is a judge and a mag­is­trate.”

No re­stric­tions on sale of tac­ti­cal wear

But while po­lice have re­peat­ed­ly seized cam­ou­flage cloth­ing and ac­ces­sories from lo­cal stores, sim­i­lar ac­tion has not been tak­en against stores that sell tac­ti­cal cloth­ing once they do not car­ry the of­fi­cial TTPS in­signia.

One lo­cal re­tail­er of se­cu­ri­ty sup­plies and tac­ti­cal ap­par­el told Guardian Me­dia that while it is his com­pa­ny’s pol­i­cy to re­quest of­fi­cial po­lice iden­ti­fi­ca­tion and au­tho­ri­sa­tion let­ters from cus­tomers buy­ing BDUs, it was not law.

He added that it was pos­si­ble for re­tail­ers else­where to sell tac­ti­cal cloth­ing with­out re­quest­ing of­fi­cial ID. The re­tail­er not­ed that op­er­a­tional wear used by po­lice and pri­vate se­cu­ri­ty firms was usu­al­ly sold lo­cal­ly for about $300, with mi­nor price fluc­tu­a­tions de­pend­ing on which store they vis­it­ed.

He ar­gued that while the TTPS could not re­al­is­ti­cal­ly mon­i­tor the sale of the items, they had a re­spon­si­bil­i­ty to en­sure their of­fi­cers were equipped with unique uni­forms that dis­tin­guished them from im­posters.

“You have peo­ple buy­ing fab­ric and mak­ing their own BDUs from scratch; that’s not the is­sue. The is­sue is that the Gov­ern­ment hasn’t reg­u­larised a uni­form and fails to ad­e­quate­ly sup­ply the of­fi­cers with uni­forms.”

A search of ama­zon.com shows that sev­er­al vari­a­tions of BDUs are avail­able for sale. But even apart from buy­ing or tai­lor­ing “home­made” uni­forms, crim­i­nals al­so have the op­tion of print­ing the po­lice lo­go on­to cloth­ing.

Se­cu­ri­ty cam­era footage from the kid­nap­ping of Su­vesh Ram­nar­ine in Cunu­pia last week­end showed his at­tack­ers wore po­lo shirts and caps that bore the of­fi­cial TTPS em­blem.

One store that spe­cialis­es in the print­ing of T-shirts and ap­par­el in east Trinidad said they typ­i­cal­ly re­ceived or­ders from po­lice of­fi­cers for sports days and oth­er recre­ation­al events but re­quest­ed of­fi­cial doc­u­ments au­tho­ris­ing cus­tomers from the TTPS for such prod­ucts.

“We try to keep it as le­git­i­mate as pos­si­ble be­cause we’re a small busi­ness and we don’t want any prob­lems. But that’s just us; we can’t say for cer­tain how oth­er places car­ry about their busi­ness.”

The clerk added that the print­ers could al­so be or­dered for peo­ple to print their items with­out hav­ing to go to a com­pa­ny.

 

LED lights pro­grammed to emit blue lights

Guardian Me­dia spoke with busi­ness­man and com­mu­ni­ty ac­tivist In­shan Ish­mael, who said while the im­por­ta­tion of blue swiv­el lights used on the roof of marked po­lice cars was pro­hib­it­ed, LED lights that could be pro­grammed to emit blue lights could be in­stalled on the dash­boards of ve­hi­cles.

Ish­mael, whose com­pa­ny, the Roll On Roll Off Cen­tre, has done main­te­nance work for po­lice ve­hi­cles in the past, said such lights could not be eas­i­ly de­tect­ed by the au­thor­i­ties when pack­aged, as they ap­peared colour­less when in­ac­tive.

“You need per­mis­sion to im­port blue­lights; you can’t just im­port it, but some lights aren’t coloured blue; they ap­pear clear or trans­par­ent, mean­ing you don’t see the colour un­less the blue LED is turned on.

“Peo­ple can im­port it and just de­scribe it as an LED light, so it pass­es through Cus­toms with­out any is­sue, so it’s dif­fi­cult for the Cus­toms agent to de­tect that if they just look at it. The ones that are eas­i­er to pick up are the ones that have the plas­tic lens that is coloured blue.”

Ish­mael said there was no straight­for­ward way of ad­dress­ing the prob­lem of po­lice im­per­son­ators, as any­one could be in­volved in as­sist­ing crim­i­nals with tai­lor­ing po­lice uni­forms.

Dur­ing Thurs­day’s me­dia brief­ing, ACP Ad­min­is­tra­tion Richard Smith said he un­der­stood the fear among the pub­lic be­cause of po­lice im­posters. Re­fer­ring to a sce­nario where dri­vers may be con­front­ed by strangers pur­port­ing to be po­lice, Smith said cit­i­zens were with­in their right to seek im­me­di­ate help if they felt they were in dan­ger.

“If you are out there at night and don’t see the (au­tho­rised) grey and blue uni­forms, then by all means, dri­ve to the near­est po­lice sta­tion. We will be sen­si­tis­ing our of­fi­cers as it re­lates to this. Every sin­gle mem­ber of the po­lice ser­vice is very con­cerned about this; we are con­cerned be­cause this is some­thing that un­der­mines our uni­form, and I dare­say des­e­crates our uni­form.”

Po­lice in­dis­ci­pline

 

Dur­ing a po­lice town hall meet­ing in Char­lieville last No­vem­ber, res­i­dents raised con­cerns over the preva­lence of crim­i­nals pos­ing as po­lice of­fi­cers to com­mit crimes but al­so re­marked that le­git­i­mate po­lice of­fi­cers them­selves may refuse to show their badges or of­fi­cial TTPS ID cards.

“Some of them are re­al of­fi­cers and are not show­ing their badge or ID but giv­ing you an at­ti­tude to go with it,” one woman re­marked.

In re­sponse, then Cen­tral Di­vi­sion Supt Miguel Mon­trichard said in such sit­u­a­tions it would be best to com­ply with the per­son con­fronting them. How­ev­er, one IATF of­fi­cer said this ex­pos­es the pub­lic to un­nec­es­sary risk and in­stead urged cit­i­zens to con­tact the near­est po­lice sta­tion for ad­vice on whether the peo­ple con­fronting them were le­git­i­mate po­lice of­fi­cers.

“It’s a tick­lish thing. They can con­tact the near­est (po­lice) sta­tion and in­form them as to what is hap­pen­ing and say they are con­cerned over the un­cer­tain­ty of it be­ing le­git­i­mate po­lice.

“Oth­er than that, there’s very lit­tle that can be done be­cause any­thing else would mean mak­ing phys­i­cal con­tact with the in­di­vid­u­als to check their iden­ti­fi­ca­tion and so on.”

The of­fi­cer ad­mit­ted that po­lice in op­er­a­tional units may be hes­i­tant or un­will­ing to show their of­fi­cial TTPS iden­ti­fi­ca­tion cards or badges, de­spite it be­ing prop­er pro­ce­dure.

Speak­ing with Guardian Me­dia on Thurs­day, re­tired po­lice Cpl Oluye­mi Mashama said of­fi­cers should present their of­fi­cial iden­ti­fi­ca­tion once re­quest­ed from the pub­lic and en­cour­aged se­nior of­fi­cers to hold their sub­or­di­nates ac­count­able to cer­tain stan­dards.

Mashama, who worked as an in­struc­tor at the po­lice acad­e­my for 13 years, said the pub­lic’s trust was nec­es­sary for the suc­cess of any crit­i­cal crime-fight­ing ini­tia­tive and warned that the fail­ure of of­fi­cers to obey their de­part­men­tal or­ders of iden­ti­fi­ca­tion could erode that sup­port.

“Po­lice of­fi­cers must be mind­ful of their du­ties to pro­tect and serve a na­tion. If you’re not do­ing it, your se­niors should do their job and hold you ac­count­able for your ac­tions.

“I think the lack of ac­count­abil­i­ty or peo­ple be­ing held ac­count­able is what could be lead­ing to­wards crim­i­nals be­ing able to get away with a lot more.”

In cas­es where peo­ple may still be doubt­ful over whether the peo­ple en­gag­ing them are in fact le­git­i­mate po­lice of­fi­cers, Mashama urged the pub­lic to stream their in­ter­ac­tions live on so­cial me­dia.

“Make sure the of­fi­cer can see your hands and say, ‘Of­fi­cers, I have start­ed a live video, and I just want you to iden­ti­fy your­selves as au­tho­rised po­lice of­fi­cers or re­al po­lice of­fi­cers.’

“Re­al po­lice of­fi­cers should not have any is­sue with this be­cause they are do­ing their job the right way, and you need to un­der­stand cit­i­zens just want to make sure they are safe.”

Mashama said that giv­en his ex­pe­ri­ence in law en­force­ment, the man­ner­isms and be­hav­iour of the ban­dits in­volved in the kid­nap­ping of Su­vesh Ram­nar­ine were un­like those of po­lice, which eas­i­ly dis­tin­guished them from le­git­i­mate of­fi­cers.

He said the rel­a­tive­ly easy-go­ing ap­proach of the at­tack­ers and the po­si­tion­ing of their ve­hi­cles around the bar where Ram­nar­ine was ab­duct­ed aroused his sus­pi­cions.

“They were too ca­su­al; the po­si­tion­ing of their ve­hi­cles for go­ing in­to some­thing that should have been a se­ri­ous raid. The tac­ti­cal ma­noeu­vres were to­tal­ly off, but I could tell from that video that some­thing wasn’t right. The amount of them that en­tered the com­pound at the same time, they were off.”

The clam­p­down on the use of op­er­a­tional uni­forms with­in the TTPS is on­ly one step to­wards a re­duc­tion in the num­ber of in­ci­dents in­volv­ing po­lice im­per­son­ators, he said.

But man­ag­ing the is­sue re­quires more than just a rein­tro­duc­tion of in­ter­nal reg­u­la­tions, as cre­ative crim­i­nals can find sev­er­al ways around such mech­a­nisms. Key to the re­duc­tion in the num­ber of fake po­lice is the co­op­er­a­tion of street-lev­el of­fi­cers to obey their own rules to re­gain the trust of the pub­lic.

What the law says about po­lice uni­forms

Un­der the Mis­cel­la­neous Pro­vi­sions Bill, any­one found guilty of wear­ing a po­lice uni­form or im­per­son­at­ing a po­lice of­fi­cer is li­able to be fined $150,000 or face five years’ im­pris­on­ment.

Clause Four of the same bill amends the Po­lice Ser­vice Act, which states that any of­fi­cer who “pawns, sells, trans­fers, loans, or makes avail­able his arms ac­cou­trements, cloth­ing, or any pub­lic prop­er­ty” is li­able to a fine of $750,000 or im­pris­on­ment for 20 years.

Un­der Sec­tion 62 of the Po­lice Ser­vice Act, Chap­ter 15:01, any­one—oth­er than a po­lice of­fi­cer—who (a) puts on or as­sumes, ei­ther in whole or in part, the uni­form, name, des­ig­na­tion, or de­scrip­tion of a po­lice of­fi­cer, or a uni­form, name, or des­ig­na­tion, re­sem­bling and in­tend­ed to re­sem­ble the uni­form, name, or des­ig­na­tion of a po­lice of­fi­cer; or (b) in any way pre­tends to be a po­lice of­fi­cer for any pur­pose which he would not by the law be en­ti­tled to do of his own au­thor­i­ty.

Crimes com­mit­ted by fake cops in 2024

• On Oc­to­ber 14, Moru­ga busi­ness­man Ter­rence Thomas was re­port­ed­ly robbed and ab­duct­ed by ban­dits who iden­ti­fied them­selves as po­lice of­fi­cers.

• Busi­ness­man Su­vesh Ram­nar­ine was kid­napped by armed men wear­ing tac­ti­cal gear and dri­ving a black Hyundai Tuc­son with blue strobe lights from a bar in Cunu­pia on Oc­to­ber 12, 2024. His where­abouts as of Thurs­day evening re­main un­known.

• Used-car deal­er Sachel Kunge­be­har­ry was kid­napped on Sep­tem­ber 25, when the car he was dri­ving was in­ter­cept­ed by a marked po­lice ve­hi­cle. Men wear­ing po­lice uni­forms took Kunge­be­har­ry away. His de­com­pos­ing body was found in a shal­low grave off Pokhor Road, Long­denville. Two po­lice of­fi­cers were charged in con­nec­tion with this. Oth­er peo­ple ar­rest­ed were lat­er re­leased.

• On Au­gust 5, Emer­son Bouch­er, 21 and Michael De Gazon were gunned down in Sama­roo Vil­lage, Ari­ma, by men dri­ving a Suzu­ki Grand Vi­tara, which was equipped with flash­ing blue lights.

• On Ju­ly 16, a 23-year-old Chi­nese na­tion­al was out­side his Bam­boo Creek, Cunu­pia, home when he was con­front­ed by men wear­ing po­lice tac­ti­cal uni­forms who stole $17,000 from him.

• On April 21, a Pe­nal bar own­er was robbed of cash and jew­ellery by four men dressed as po­lice of­fi­cers. The men then re­port­ed­ly es­caped in a car equipped with blue flash­ing lights and a siren.

• On March 11, Bud­dy George, 59, his sons, Je­re­mi­ah George, Mar­cus Bud­dy, and gar­den­er Dion Key­on Men­doza, were ex­e­cut­ed in a Ma­yaro for­est by men wear­ing po­lice tac­ti­cal gear and who iden­ti­fied them­selves as po­lice of­fi­cers.

• On Jan­u­ary 16, Is­rael McLaren, 19, Shaq­keem Den­nis, 27, and Jo­mol Williams were lim­ing in Par­adise Heights, Mor­vant, when gun­men wear­ing tac­ti­cal gear got out of a dark grey pick­up truck. The killers iden­ti­fied them­selves as po­lice of­fi­cers be­fore shoot­ing the trio, killing them.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored