JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 15, 2025

Judge rips into EOT for blocking Veera’s appointment

by

Derek Achong
1208 days ago
20211123
Attorney Veera Bhajan

Attorney Veera Bhajan

The Equal Op­por­tu­ni­ty Tri­bunal (EOT) and its chair­man Don­na Prow­ell-Raphael have come un­der stiff crit­i­cism for their adamance in block­ing EOT lay as­ses­sor Veera Bha­jan from tak­ing up her ap­point­ment.

 In rul­ing that the EOT and Prow­ell-Ra­pa­hel act­ed il­le­gal­ly and be­yond their statu­to­ry re­mit in tak­ing the ac­tion yes­ter­day, High Court Judge Ava­son Quin­lan-Williams not­ed that the lyrics of lo­cal dance­hall artist Gen­er­al Grant’s hit “Pure Hate” res­onat­ed with her through­out her con­sid­er­a­tion of the case. 

“Pure hate and act­ing nor­mal,” Quin­lan-Williams re­peat­ed.

In ad­di­tion to is­su­ing de­c­la­ra­tions against the tri­bunal and Prow­ell-Raphael, Quin­lan-Williams or­dered that Bha­jan be paid her salary and ben­e­fits which were with­held since March, plus in­ter­est and that Bha­jan’s ap­point­ment be im­me­di­ate­ly fa­cil­i­tat­ed. 

The tri­bunal and Prow­ell-Raphael were or­dered to pay $100,000 in dam­ages for the dis­tress and em­bar­rass­ment they caused Bha­jan. 

Jus­tice Quin­lan-Williams al­so or­dered $250,000 in vin­di­ca­to­ry dam­ages to high­light the court’s strong feel­ings over what tran­spired. 

“There ought to be a sense of pub­lic out­rage over what oc­curred,” Quin­lan-Williams said as she said the at­tempts to block the ap­point­ment were dis­turb­ing and off-putting. 

She said she had dif­fi­cul­ties in writ­ing the judge­ment, not based on the le­gal is­sues be­fore her but in strik­ing a bal­ance in be­ing crit­i­cal of the con­duct and be­ing ju­di­cious in her choice of words to de­scribe it. 

“It is in­ex­plic­a­ble that this mat­ter is be­fore a court,” she said. 

Quin­lan-Williams not­ed that based on the ev­i­dence be­fore her, Prow­ell-Raphael nev­er spoke di­rect­ly with Bha­jan af­ter she was ap­point­ed by Pres­i­dent Paula-Mae Weekes on March 17. 

“What is up with that?” Quin­lan-Williams asked. 

The judge al­so ques­tioned whether Prow­ell-Raphael would re­con­sid­er her con­tin­ued role on the tri­bunal. 

“I won­der if at the end of this saga, af­ter all is said and done and when there is an op­por­tu­ni­ty to re­flect on de­ci­sions made and ac­tions tak­en, whether the sec­ond de­fen­dant would, in a qui­et time, re­flect on whether she is the best fit for chair of the Equal Op­por­tu­ni­ty Tri­bunal,” Quin­lan-Williams said. 

Quin­lan-Williams not­ed that the chal­lenges per­sist­ed even af­ter the Of­fice of the Pres­i­dent and Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al stood by the le­gal­i­ty of the ap­point­ment and sup­port­ed Bha­jan’s le­gal chal­lenge. 

“There was no re­gard to the man­date of the tri­bunal to pre­vent dis­crim­i­na­tion and to pro­mote equal op­por­tu­ni­ties for peo­ple of un­equal sta­tus. There was no re­gard for how it would look to the rest of us that a per­son who is law­ful­ly ap­point­ed by Her Ex­cel­len­cy can­not get her just dues from the EOT and its chair,” she said. 

Quin­lan-Williams com­mend­ed Bha­jan for hav­ing the will and for­ti­tude to pur­sue the law­suit. 

“It is not any­one and every­one who can take on that fight but the Claimant can and she has. It is no won­der, there­fore, she was ap­point­ed to the EOT,” she said. 

In her judge­ment, Quin­lan-Williams not­ed that over the past few months, the tri­bunal and Prow­ell-Raphael gave vary­ing base­less rea­sons on why Bha­jan should not be al­lowed to as­sume her du­ties, in­clud­ing the tri­bunal’s lim­it­ed fi­nan­cial re­sources, its in­abil­i­ty to ac­com­mo­date a mem­ber with a dis­abil­i­ty and al­le­ga­tions that Bha­jan may be per­ceived to be bi­ased based on her dis­abil­i­ty. 

Quin­lan-Williams sound­ly re­ject­ed claims that Bha­jan, who was born with­out arms and re­ceived the Hum­ming­bird Medal (Sil­ver) in 2011, did not have 10 years com­bined ex­pe­ri­ence in law and so­cial work as re­quired for the lay-as­ses­sor po­si­tion. 

“As to her qual­i­fi­ca­tions to hold the post of lay-as­ses­sor, her life has been the best tes­ta­ment to so­cial wel­fare. She has lived it. Her ex­pe­ri­ences are from the time of her birth,” she said. 

Un­der the Equal Op­por­tu­ni­ty Act, the tri­bunal con­sists of a chair­man and two lay-as­ses­sors. While the Ju­di­cial and Le­gal Ser­vice Com­mis­sion (JLSC) ad­vis­es the Pres­i­dent on the ap­point­ment of the chair­man, the lay-as­ses­sors are se­lect­ed by the Pres­i­dent. The tri­bunal is man­dat­ed to hear and de­ter­mine dis­crim­i­na­tion com­plaints un­der the leg­is­la­tion, which are re­ferred to it by the Equal Op­por­tu­ni­ty Com­mis­sion. 

In a press re­lease mo­ments af­ter the judge­ment, the tri­bunal said it re­spect­ed the de­ci­sion but con­tin­ued to de­ny any wrong­do­ing.

“The Tri­bunal has been guid­ed by best prac­tices and pro­fes­sion­al ad­vice at all time,” it said. 

“The Tri­bunal re­spects the rul­ing of the Ho­n­ourable Court and will meet with its at­tor­neys to de­ter­mine its next steps. The Tri­bunal looks for­ward to con­tin­u­ing to serve the cit­i­zens of T&T.”

Ear­li­er yes­ter­day, the tri­bunal is­sued a sep­a­rate and un­re­lat­ed re­lease in which it an­nounced that its cas­es sched­uled for hear­ing in De­cem­ber were ad­journed, as it re­mains with­out ac­cess to fa­cil­i­ties to con­duct in-per­son and vir­tu­al hear­ings. 

Bha­jan was rep­re­sent­ed by Alvin Fitz­patrick, SC, Ra­jiv Per­sad, Michael Rooplal, Ra­jiv Chaitoo, Shari Fitz­patrick and Gabriel Her­nan­dez. The EOT and its chair­man were rep­re­sent­ed by Ramesh Lawrence Ma­haraj, SC, Leon Kalicha­ran, Kiel Tak­lals­ingh and Ka­ri­na Singh. Rishi Dass, Te­nille Ramkissoon, Svet­lana Dass and Karis­sa Singh rep­re­sent­ed the AG’s Of­fice.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored