JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Judges sides with TSC’s policy of hiring teachers for denominational schools

by

Derek Achong
8 days ago
20250311
High Court Judge Westmin James

High Court Judge Westmin James

Courtesy LINKEDIN page

A move by the Teach­ing Ser­vice Com­mis­sion (TSC) to in­tro­duce a new pro­ce­dure for the re­cruit­ment of teach­ers for de­nom­i­na­tion­al schools has re­ceived the nod of ap­proval from a High Court Judge. 

De­liv­er­ing a judg­ment, yes­ter­day morn­ing, High Court Judge West­min James dis­missed a law­suit brought by the Pres­by­ter­ian Church of T&T against the com­mis­sion. 

The law­suit cen­tred around the com­mis­sion’s de­ci­sion tak­en in 2021. 

It was pur­sued by the Pres­by­ter­ian Church on be­half of the Pres­by­ter­ian Pri­ma­ry Schools’ Board of Ed­u­ca­tion. 

Be­fore the de­ci­sion, prospec­tive teach­ers reg­is­tered with the Min­istry of Ed­u­ca­tion would ap­ply to de­nom­i­na­tion­al boards with va­can­cies in their schools and be in­ter­viewed. 

The boards made rec­om­men­da­tions and the TSC and the min­istry then con­duct­ed their own in­ter­views. The re­sults of the in­ter­views were pro­vid­ed to the boards, who were al­lowed to raise ob­jec­tions on moral and re­li­gious grounds. 

Suc­cess­ful can­di­dates were then placed in va­cant po­si­tions. 

In 2021, the com­mis­sion not­ed there were 2,000 pend­ing ap­pli­ca­tions for teach­ing jobs in pri­ma­ry schools. 

It then im­ple­ment­ed its pro­posed pol­i­cy un­der which it would cease ac­cept­ing new ap­pli­ca­tions un­less there were va­can­cies, ac­cept ap­pli­ca­tions on­ly for known va­can­cies, and in­ter­view ap­pli­cants with the old­est go­ing first. 

The boards would then be per­mit­ted to rec­om­mend teach­ers from the suc­cess­ful can­di­dates al­ready screened by the com­mis­sion. 

The TSC’s move and de­ci­sion to ad­ver­tise va­can­cies for those po­si­tions in schools con­trolled and man­aged by the Pres­by­ter­ian Pri­ma­ry Schools’ Board of Ed­u­ca­tion was chal­lenged.

In de­ter­min­ing the case, Jus­tice James con­sid­ered the pro­vi­sions of the Con­sti­tu­tion, the Pub­lic Ser­vice Com­mis­sion Reg­u­la­tions, and the Con­cor­dat of 1960, which es­tab­lished the re­la­tion­ship be­tween de­nom­i­na­tion­al school boards and the Gov­ern­ment, since be­fore In­de­pen­dence.

In rul­ing that the al­leged old pol­i­cy was not a set­tled prac­tice and the 2021 pol­i­cy was valid, Jus­tice James ruled that it (the old pol­i­cy) would have been re­flect­ed in the reg­u­la­tions and the Con­cor­dat. 

“The fact that it is ab­sent from these doc­u­ments al­so demon­strates to this Court that it was not a well-set­tled prac­tice or el­e­vat­ed to con­sti­tu­tion­al pro­tec­tion,” he said. 

He al­so sug­gest­ed that the al­leged old pol­i­cy con­flict­ed with the es­tab­lished le­gal frame­work. 

He al­so ruled that it was dis­crim­i­na­to­ry to qual­i­fied prospec­tive teach­ers, who did not ap­ply to the boards first. 

Jus­tice James al­so re­ject­ed claims that the com­mis­sion was ob­lig­at­ed to ac­cept the rec­om­men­da­tions of the de­nom­i­na­tion­al boards. 

Stat­ing that rec­om­men­da­tions are ad­vi­so­ry and not bind­ing, Jus­tice James said: “Nei­ther the Reg­u­la­tions nor the Con­cor­dat recog­nise a con­sti­tu­tion­al right to au­to­mat­ic ac­cep­tance of rec­om­men­da­tion.

“This would un­der­mine the dis­cre­tion of the TSC and ren­der reg­u­la­to­ry safe­guards mean­ing­less,” he added. 

Jus­tice James al­so re­ject­ed claims over the com­mis­sion’s de­ci­sion to ad­ver­tise va­can­cies in ac­cor­dance with the new pol­i­cy in 2022. 

“I there­fore find no ba­sis to hold that the ad­ver­tise­ment de­ci­sion was ul­tra vires, an im­prop­er ex­er­cise of dis­cre­tion, based on ir­rel­e­vant con­sid­er­a­tions and/or un­rea­son­able,” he said. 

De­spite his find­ings, Jus­tice James ac­knowl­edged the sig­nif­i­cance of pre­serv­ing the de­nom­i­na­tion­al char­ac­ter of as­sist­ed schools by af­firm­ing the Con­cor­dat. 

“How­ev­er, if the de­nom­i­na­tion­al boards seek to al­ter this arrange­ment, such changes should be pur­sued through good faith ne­go­ti­a­tions with the Gov­ern­ment, fol­lowed by the nec­es­sary leg­isla­tive and con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ments,” he said. 

“This Court does not be­lieve that this can be achieved through ju­di­cial ac­tion that would cir­cum­vent the es­tab­lished le­gal and con­sti­tu­tion­al process­es,” he added. 

He al­so or­dered the par­ties to bear their own le­gal costs based on the sig­nif­i­cance of the case. 

‘Time need­ed to con­sid­er ap­peal’

Con­tact­ed yes­ter­day, Chair­man of the Pres­by­ter­ian Pri­ma­ry Schools’ Board of Ed­u­ca­tion Vick­ram Ram­lal said he and his fel­low board mem­bers need­ed time to de­cide whether the judg­ment would be ap­pealed. 

“The Board has to study the judg­ment and con­sult with our at­tor­neys and will then is­sue a state­ment,” Ram­lal said. 

In a state­ment, chief ex­ec­u­tive of­fi­cer of the Catholic Ed­u­ca­tion Board of Man­age­ment (CEBM) Sharon Man­groo said her or­gan­i­sa­tion, which was an in­ter­est­ed par­ty in the case, was dis­ap­point­ed with the out­come. 

Mungroo, who al­so serves as head of the As­so­ci­a­tion of De­nom­i­na­tion­al Boards of Ed­u­ca­tion (ADBE), stat­ed that the last ad­ver­tise­ment for ap­pli­ca­tions for teach­ing po­si­tions in de­nom­i­na­tion­al schools was is­sued in Jan­u­ary 2023. 

“The list of can­di­dates who meet the cri­te­ria nec­es­sary to up­hold the preser­va­tion and char­ac­ter of Catholic schools was ex­haust­ed in 2024, leav­ing no suit­able can­di­dates to fill the 44 ex­ist­ing teacher va­can­cies in 32 Catholic pri­ma­ry schools,” she said. 

“The on­go­ing in­abil­i­ty to fill per­ma­nent teacher va­can­cies prompt­ly leaves stu­dents with­out a teacher for ex­tend­ed pe­ri­ods, which hin­ders our abil­i­ty to pro­vide qual­i­ty ed­u­ca­tion in our schools,” she added. 

Man­groo ex­pressed hope that a so­lu­tion could be found through di­a­logue. 

“The CEBM looks for­ward to any good faith ne­go­ti­a­tions that en­able the pro­vi­sion of Catholic ed­u­ca­tion to the stu­dents in our schools,” she said. 

 

 


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored