JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

Man sentenced to 20 years for JP’s killing

by

448 days ago
20240131
Justice Lisa Ramsumair-Hinds

Justice Lisa Ramsumair-Hinds

NICOLE DRAYTON

Derek Achong

Se­nior Re­porter

derek.achong@guardian.co.tt

A man has been sen­tenced to a lit­tle un­der 20 years in prison af­ter ad­mit­ting to ab­duct­ing an 80-year-old Jus­tice of the Peace (JP), who was lat­er found mur­dered in 2008.

Ja­son Whar­ton, who was await­ing tri­al for mur­der­ing JP Win­ston Best, was al­lowed to plead guilty to felony mur­der be­fore Jus­tice Lisa Ram­sumair-Hinds based on a plea agree­ment with the Of­fice of the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions struck ear­li­er this month.

Un­der the felony mur­der rule, the manda­to­ry death penal­ty for mur­der is waived in cir­cum­stances where death re­sults dur­ing the com­mis­sion of a less­er crim­i­nal of­fence.

Ac­cord­ing to the sum­ma­ry of ev­i­dence in the case, on Feb­ru­ary 24, 2008, Best was re­port­ed miss­ing af­ter he was picked up by a man at his Mor­vant home and did not re­turn.

Five days lat­er, Best’s body was found buried in a shal­low grave at Quar­ry Road in San Juan.

The car that was used by the man to pick up Best was found aban­doned at a shop­ping cen­tre in cen­tral Trinidad.

An au­top­sy re­vealed that Best was stran­gled and shot in his head.

When Whar­ton was de­tained by po­lice weeks lat­er, he con­fessed to his role in the crime.

He claimed that he was con­tact­ed by a group of men who asked him to arrange to pick up Best and de­liv­er him to them.

Whar­ton claimed that he ini­tial­ly de­clined but even­tu­al­ly re­lent­ed af­ter the men threat­ened to mur­der him if he did not com­ply.

He ad­mit­ted that he con­tact­ed Best and told him that he had an el­der­ly and bedrid­den rel­a­tive in Trinci­ty who re­quired his ser­vices.

Af­ter pick­ing up Best, he claimed, he took him to the men who were at the lo­ca­tion where his body was even­tu­al­ly found.

He then aban­doned the ve­hi­cle he used.

Dur­ing the hear­ing, pros­e­cu­tor Char­maine Samuel pre­sent­ed a vic­tim im­pact state­ment from Best’s daugh­ter.

She claimed that her fa­ther’s mur­der had a last­ing im­pact on their fam­i­ly, es­pe­cial­ly her moth­er, whose men­tal and phys­i­cal health de­te­ri­o­rat­ed.

She al­so called on Jus­tice Ram­sumair-Hinds to en­sure that Whar­ton served a lengthy sen­tence for the crime, as he did not show re­morse and de­clined to iden­ti­fy the peo­ple who in­struct­ed him to kid­nap her fa­ther.

“I would hope the time served in prison would give him time to re­flect on how his ac­tions af­fect­ed us,” she said.

In his mit­i­ga­tion plea, Whar­ton’s lawyer, Wayne Sturge, point­ed out that his client had re­peat­ed­ly ex­pressed will­ing­ness to plead guilty to the crime but could not do so as he was fac­ing the manda­to­ry death penal­ty.

He sug­gest­ed that Whar­ton was on­ly able to take the ac­tion af­ter the DPP’s Of­fice agreed to the plea agree­ment.

“I ask the court to tem­per jus­tice with mer­cy and give Mr Whar­ton an op­por­tu­ni­ty to make the best of the rest of his life,” Sturge said.

In as­sess­ing the ap­pro­pri­ate sen­tence for Whar­ton, Jus­tice Ram­sumair-Hinds not­ed that the 30-year start­ing sen­tence agreed to by pros­e­cu­tors and his de­fence at­tor­neys could have been high­er.

How­ev­er, she de­clined to in­crease it as she not­ed that it would not bring the ad­min­is­tra­tion of jus­tice in­to dis­re­pute.

Jus­tice Ram­sumair-Hinds then ap­plied a one-year dis­count based on Whar­ton’s clean crim­i­nal record be­fore be­ing charged and the as­sis­tance he pro­vid­ed to the po­lice.

“He was pre­pared to face a manda­to­ry death penal­ty all in an ef­fort to spare the State and wit­ness­es the hard­ship and ex­pens­es of a tri­al,” she said.

While she not­ed that Whar­ton claimed that he was un­der duress, she point­ed out that it was not a valid ex­cuse for his ac­tions.

“It does not ex­cuse it at all,” she said.

Af­ter ap­ply­ing a one-third dis­count for his guilty plea and de­duct­ing the time he spent on re­mand be­fore be­ing sen­tenced, Whar­ton was left with three years, eight months and ten days to serve be­fore he was even­tu­al­ly re­leased.

Jus­tice Ram­sumair-Hinds al­so sought to ex­plain why she could not pro­long Whar­ton’s time in prison as sug­gest­ed by Best’s daugh­ter.

“The idea of lock­ing up peo­ple and throw­ing away the key is frankly not the re­al­i­ty. Peo­ple who run afoul of the law even­tu­al­ly re­join us in so­ci­ety,” Jus­tice Ram­sumair-Hinds said.

“It is my hope that when you re­join us in so­ci­ety, you make changes for the greater good. I wish you all the best. Please be very cir­cum­spect of the choic­es you make,” she added.

Whar­ton was al­so rep­re­sent­ed by Danielle Ram­per­sad.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored