JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, April 4, 2025

Petroleum dealers: No consultation on fuel hike

by

1084 days ago
20220415

The T&T Pe­tro­le­um Deal­ers As­so­ci­a­tion has called on its mem­bers to take steps to con­serve its in­ven­to­ry in an­tic­i­pa­tion of an ex­pect­ed in­crease in de­mand due to the pend­ing hike in fu­el prices on Tues­day. 

The as­so­ci­a­tion made the call in a press re­lease is­sued yes­ter­day fol­low­ing the Min­istry of Fi­nance’s is­suance of the pe­tro­le­um pric­ing or­der for the in­creas­es, which did not in­clude an ad­just­ment of the re­tail mar­gins for whole­salers and re­tail­ers. 

“This in­crease in the price of pe­tro­le­um prod­ucts oc­curred with no con­sul­ta­tion with the pe­tro­le­um deal­ers, who are ex­pect­ed to re­main open as nor­mal and to ex­pect to have their in­ven­to­ries of fu­el de­plet­ed over this long hol­i­day week­end,” it said. 

It ex­plained that the in­crease at the pump with­out an in­crease in mar­gins would di­rect­ly re­duce the vi­a­bil­i­ty of its mem­bers’ busi­ness­es as they would have to bor­row mon­ey to fi­nance the in­creased cost of in­ven­to­ry. 

“Pe­tro­le­um Deal­ers are Price Tak­ers in an in­dus­try of Gov­ern­ment Price Con­trol and are the ones who place their pri­vate cap­i­tal to buy fu­el to sell to the Pub­lic. Deal­ers must be in a po­si­tion to pay their tax­es and cov­er their ex­pens­es, to be able to pro­vide goods and ser­vices to the Mo­tor­ing Pub­lic of T&T,” it said. 

Con­tact­ed yes­ter­day af­ter­noon, Unit­ed In­de­pen­dent Pe­tro­le­um Mark­ing Com­pa­ny Lim­it­ed (Unipet) CEO Dex­ter Ri­ley said that while his or­gan­i­sa­tion agreed with some as­pects of the as­so­ci­a­tion’s re­lease, it was con­fused by the call to pro­tect in­ven­to­ry. 

“I do not know what they mean by that so we did not ad­vise our cus­tomers on that point,” Ri­ley said. 

Ri­ley ex­plained that the price in­crease would di­rect­ly af­fect his com­pa­ny, which en­gages in the whole­sale and re­tail of pe­tro­le­um prod­ucts, as it would mean an in­crease in rev­enues and a cor­re­spond­ing rise in Green Fund and Busi­ness Levy pay­ments. 

“So with the same mar­gin, we would have to pay more tax­es,” he said. 

Ri­ley said that deal­ers would al­so have to in­cur in­creased bank fees as they would have to source ad­di­tion­al fi­nances to pay for the same vol­umes of fu­el. 

While Ri­ley not­ed that pe­tro­le­um deal­ers re­ceived some re­lief in 2017 and 2020 when the Gov­ern­ment twice in­creased their mar­gins by five cents per litre, such was quick­ly erod­ed by suc­ces­sive in­creas­es in the cost of fu­el at the pump.

“Now we are get­ting a large drop which is a $1. Our tax­es alone would go up by ap­prox­i­mate­ly 21 per­cent,” he said. 

Asked what ac­tion, if any, could be tak­en by his com­pa­ny to al­le­vi­ate the sit­u­a­tion, Ri­ley ad­mit­ted that it was lim­it­ed to con­tin­u­ous ad­vo­ca­cy to the Gov­ern­ment. 

“Ba­si­cal­ly, we hope to en­gage the au­thor­i­ties and point out the im­pact in a more de­tailed way in the hope that they would recog­nise the need and val­ue of this es­sen­tial ser­vice, the fact we trans­port dan­ger­ous goods; and that it is a labour and cap­i­tal in­ten­sive in­dus­try,” Ri­ley said. 

Ri­ley sug­gest­ed that the de­crease in vi­a­bil­i­ty of the in­dus­try would al­so ham­per the abil­i­ty of mem­bers to in­vest in clean en­er­gy so­lu­tions with the glob­al shift to­wards elec­tric and hy­brid ve­hi­cles. 

“We need the op­por­tu­ni­ty to make this in­vest­ment and that has to come from the mar­gin as well,” Ri­ley said. 

Con­tact­ed yes­ter­day, gas sta­tion own­er/op­er­a­tor Reval Chat­ter­goon said that while he had not seen the re­lease from the as­so­ci­a­tion, he could un­der­stand why fel­low deal­ers may be tempt­ed to con­sid­er it. 

“It makes some­what fi­nan­cial sense be­cause as a gas sta­tion op­er­a­tor we have a very abu­sive re­la­tion­ship where no­body re­al­ly ap­pre­ci­ates the gas sta­tion deal­er and un­der­stands that we are re­al­ly get­ting bread­crumbs all the time,” Chat­ter­goon said. 

“I would not get an­gry at any­body who wants to man­age their in­ven­to­ry to make some­thing be­cause for far too many years we have been mak­ing less than our em­ploy­ees or jan­i­tors in the dis­tri­b­u­tion net­work and in the Min­istry of En­er­gy...The abuse has to stop,” he added.  

He not­ed that while on pa­per gas sta­tion op­er­a­tors make four and a half per cent on a litre, in re­al­i­ty, it is two and a half per­cent be­fore over­heads as 0.9 per cent goes to tax­es and one per cent to cred­it card sales. 

“I be­lieve we may be the on­ly in­dus­try in the world that could op­er­ate on those kinds of mar­gins,” Chat­ter­goon said, as he not­ed that gas sta­tion op­er­a­tors in the Unit­ed States make be­tween ten and 13 per cent. 

Chat­ter­goon, the for­mer head of the Ari­ma Busi­ness As­so­ci­a­tion, said that he had writ­ten to En­er­gy and En­er­gy In­dus­tries Min­is­ter Stu­art Young sev­er­al times seek­ing a meet­ing to dis­cuss peren­ni­al is­sues plagu­ing the in­dus­try to no avail. 

He ex­pressed hope that he would be grant­ed the meet­ing soon and the Gov­ern­ment would re­con­sid­er its po­si­tion on the mar­gins. 

“They have some time that they could change it...At the end of the day, if the Gov­ern­ment is get­ting a dol­lar more, you mean to say that they can not give five cents or ten cents on that dol­lar?” he said. 

CLICK FOR MORE NEWS


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored