JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, April 3, 2025

Rutgers University study: Patients asking doctors about better alternatives to smoking

by

JOEL JULIEN
986 days ago
20220721
Burning cigarette. Image by Ralf Kunze from Pixabay

Burning cigarette. Image by Ralf Kunze from Pixabay

JOEL JULIEN

 

A study con­duct­ed by Rut­gers Uni­ver­si­ty in the Unit­ed States re­veals that 70 per cent of doc­tors re­port­ed their adult smok­ing pa­tients had asked them about e-cig­a­rettes and oth­er smoke-free prod­ucts, ev­i­denc­ing an im­por­tant in­ter­est in bet­ter al­ter­na­tives than the tra­di­tion­al cig­a­rette. A third of the doc­tors al­so said their pa­tients had asked them in the past 30 days.

The study was pub­lished by the Jour­nal of The Amer­i­can Med­ical As­so­ci­a­tion, one of the world's lead­ing pop­u­lar sci­ence jour­nals. Ac­cord­ing to the study, doc­tors are sig­nif­i­cant­ly more like­ly to rec­om­mend e-cig­a­rettes for heavy smok­ers, while rec­om­mend­ing FDA-ap­proved drugs, such as nico­tine gum, for oc­ca­sion­al smok­ers.

“As the ev­i­dence grows show­ing e-cig­a­rettes as po­ten­tial­ly ef­fec­tive for smok­ing ces­sa­tion, they may play a piv­otal role in re­duc­ing use of cig­a­rettes and sub­se­quent­ly to­bac­co-caused dis­ease,” said study au­thor Michael Stein­berg, med­ical di­rec­tor of the Rut­gers To­bac­co De­pen­dence Pro­gram at the Cen­ter for To­bac­co Stud­ies and di­vi­sion chief in the De­part­ment of Med­i­cine at the Rut­gers Robert Wood John­son Med­ical School. “It’s im­por­tant to un­der­stand physi­cians’ per­spec­tives on e-cig­a­rettes as a means for harm re­duc­tion.”

Re­search re­sults sug­gest the more doc­tors un­der­stand that not all to­bac­co prod­ucts are equal­ly harm­ful, the more like­ly they are to rec­om­mend e-cig­a­rettes or oth­er smoke-free prod­ucts to peo­ple seek­ing to quit smok­ing or be­ing treat­ed for a dis­ease caused by to­bac­co.

"It is crit­i­cal to ad­dress doc­tors' mis­per­cep­tions and ed­u­cate them, in par­tic­u­lar by cor­rect­ing their mis­per­cep­tions that all to­bac­co prod­ucts are equal­ly harm­ful, as op­posed to the fact that burnt to­bac­co is by far the most dan­ger­ous," said lead au­thor Cristine Del­ne­vo, di­rec­tor of Rut­gers' Cen­ter for To­bac­co Stud­ies at the Rut­gers School of Pub­lic Health, on the study´s of­fi­cial press re­lease.

To­day, there are smoke-free prod­ucts sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly sup­port­ed as bet­ter op­tions than con­tin­u­ing to smoke, since, un­like the tra­di­tion­al cig­a­rette, they elim­i­nate the com­bus­tion process, which is the main cause of dam­age linked to smok­ing.

In re­cent years, al­ter­na­tive prod­ucts to cig­a­rettes have been de­vel­oped, such as elec­tron­ic cig­a­rettes and heat­ed to­bac­co prod­ucts, aimed at those peo­ple who will oth­er­wise con­tin­ue to smoke.

HealthSmokingResearch


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored