JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, May 29, 2025

Ukraine rushes drinking water to flooded areas as officials wrestle with impact of major dam breach

by

721 days ago
20230607
Streets are flooded in Kherson, Ukraine, Wednesday, June 7, 2023 after the Kakhovka dam was blown up. Residents of southern Ukraine, some who spent the night on rooftops, braced for a second day of swelling floodwaters on Wednesday as authorities warned that a Dnieper River dam breach would continue to unleash pent-up waters from a giant reservoir. (AP Photo/Libkos)

Streets are flooded in Kherson, Ukraine, Wednesday, June 7, 2023 after the Kakhovka dam was blown up. Residents of southern Ukraine, some who spent the night on rooftops, braced for a second day of swelling floodwaters on Wednesday as authorities warned that a Dnieper River dam breach would continue to unleash pent-up waters from a giant reservoir. (AP Photo/Libkos)

Au­thor­i­ties on Wednes­day rushed sup­plies of drink­ing wa­ter to flood­ed ar­eas from a col­lapsed dam in south­ern Ukraine as of­fi­cials weighed where they might re­set­tle res­i­dents who re­lied on the breached reser­voir on the Dnieper Riv­er that forms part of the front line in the 15-month war.

More than 2,700 peo­ple have fled flood­ed ar­eas on both the Russ­ian and Ukrain­ian-con­trolled sides of the riv­er, ac­cord­ing to of­fi­cial tal­lies, but it was not clear whether the true scale of the dis­as­ter had yet emerged in an area that was home to more than 60,000 peo­ple.

The Kakhov­ka hy­dro­elec­tric dam and reser­voir, es­sen­tial for sup­ply­ing drink­ing wa­ter and ir­ri­ga­tion to a huge area of south­ern Ukraine, lies in a part of the Kher­son re­gion oc­cu­pied by Moscow’s forces for the past year.

It is al­so crit­i­cal for wa­ter sup­plies to the Crimean Penin­su­la, which was il­le­gal­ly an­nexed by Rus­sia in 2014.

Ukraine holds the west­ern bank of the Dnieper, while Rus­sia con­trols the east­ern side, which is low­er and more vul­ner­a­ble to flood­ing.

Scenes of flood­ed com­mu­ni­ties, res­cues — and even peo­ple re­port­ed­ly wait­ing for help on their roofs in some Russ­ian-oc­cu­pied ar­eas — called to mind a nat­ur­al dis­as­ter, rather than one caused by war.

In some Russ­ian-oc­cu­pied ar­eas along the riv­er, peo­ple re­port­ed­ly wait­ed on roofs for help — scenes that called to mind a nat­ur­al dis­as­ter, rather than one caused by war.

A day af­ter the dam’s col­lapse, it re­mained un­clear what caused it, with both sides blam­ing each oth­er for the de­struc­tion. Some ex­perts said the col­lapse may have been due to wartime dam­age and ne­glect, al­though oth­ers ar­gued that Rus­sia might have had tac­ti­cal mil­i­tary rea­sons to de­stroy the dam.

Many res­i­dents have fled the re­gion due to the fight­ing, but oth­ers have stayed de­spite shelling and drone at­tacks, mak­ing it hard to de­ter­mine how many peo­ple re­main at risk in an area where hun­dreds of thou­sands lived be­fore Rus­sia’s Feb­ru­ary 2022 in­va­sion.

Ukraine Pres­i­dent Volodymyr Ze­len­skyy said he met with of­fi­cials on the “ur­gent pro­vi­sion of drink­ing wa­ter and long-term so­lu­tions for set­tle­ments that were de­pen­dent on the reser­voir,” as well as as­sess­ing dam­age to prop­er­ty and the en­vi­ron­ment in the re­gion.

Flood­ing could wash away this sea­son’s crops, while the de­plet­ed Kakhov­ka reser­voir would de­ny ad­e­quate ir­ri­ga­tion in the years ahead.

Ze­len­skyy ac­cused Moscow-in­stalled of­fi­cials in oc­cu­pied ar­eas of fail­ing to re­spond ad­e­quate­ly to the emer­gency.

Russ­ian-con­trolled au­thor­i­ties said they evac­u­at­ed few­er than 1,300 peo­ple in an area where as many as 40,000 peo­ple were said to be af­fect­ed. That com­pared with about 1,700 evac­u­at­ed on the Ukrain­ian side where the pop­u­la­tion was re­port­ed­ly around 42,000.

Res­i­dents of the Moscow-con­trolled vil­lage of Oleshky were re­port­ed to be strand­ed, ac­cord­ing to the in­de­pen­dent Russ­ian news out­let Vy­orstka.

It quot­ed one woman as say­ing that her moth­er, who couldn’t make it to the roof, was in the wa­ter clutch­ing a lad­der. A vol­un­teer said those await­ing evac­u­a­tion in­clud­ed chil­dren and dis­abled peo­ple, it added.

Ze­len­skyy said Ukraine will ap­peal to in­ter­na­tion­al or­ga­ni­za­tions for help.

Civil­ians in Kher­son clutched per­son­al be­long­ings as they wad­ed through knee-deep wa­ter in the streets and rode rub­ber rafts. Video on so­cial me­dia showed res­cuers car­ry­ing peo­ple to safe­ty, and what looked like the tri­an­gu­lar roof of a build­ing float­ing down­stream.

Aer­i­al footage showed flood­ed streets in the Russ­ian-con­trolled city of No­va Kakhovs­ka on the east­ern side of the Dnieper, where May­or Vladimir Leon­tyev said sev­en peo­ple were miss­ing, al­though be­lieved to be alive.

It was un­clear how the dam dis­as­ter would af­fect the war just as Ukraine ap­peared to be prepar­ing for a coun­terof­fen­sive against Russ­ian troops. Amid the dis­as­ter re­sponse, ar­tillery boomed as peo­ple scram­bled to leave the dan­ger zone.

Ad­dress­ing who might be to blame, the In­sti­tute for the Study of War, a Wash­ing­ton think tank, said Rus­sia has “a greater and clear­er in­ter­est in flood­ing the low­er Dnieper de­spite the dam­age to their own pre­pared de­fen­sive po­si­tions.”

Amid spec­u­la­tion that Ukraine might have be­gun its long-an­tic­i­pat­ed coun­terof­fen­sive, the ISW said Russ­ian forces may think breach­ing the dam could cov­er a pos­si­ble re­treat and de­lay Ukraine’s push.

Ex­perts not­ed that the 1950s-era dam, about 70 kilo­me­ters (44 miles) to the east of the city of Kher­son, was be­lieved to be in dis­re­pair and vul­ner­a­ble to col­lapse as wa­ter was al­ready brim­ming over when the wall gave way. It hadn’t been pro­duc­ing pow­er since No­vem­ber, ac­cord­ing to of­fi­cials.

Britain’s Min­istry of De­fense said the Kakhov­ka reser­voir was at “record high” wa­ter lev­els be­fore the breach. While the dam wasn’t en­tire­ly washed away, the min­istry warned that its struc­ture “is like­ly to de­te­ri­o­rate fur­ther over the next few days, caus­ing ad­di­tion­al flood­ing.”

Un­der­scor­ing the war’s glob­al reper­cus­sions, wheat prices jumped 3% af­ter the col­lapse. Ukraine and Rus­sia are key glob­al sup­pli­ers of wheat, bar­ley, sun­flower oil and oth­er food to Africa, the Mid­dle East and parts of Asia.

Both sides warned of en­vi­ron­men­tal dis­as­ters from pol­lut­ed wa­ters, part­ly caused by oil leak­ing from the dam’s ma­chin­ery. The emp­ty reser­voir could lat­er de­prive farm­land of ir­ri­ga­tion.

Of­fi­cials from Rus­sia and Ukraine, and the U.N., have said that the dam­age will take days to as­sess and warned of a long re­cov­ery pe­ri­od.

As­so­ciates Press re­porter Il­lia Novikov in Kyiv con­tributed.

KHER­SON, Ukraine (AP) —

Ukraine Russia WarInstagramInternational


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored