JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 29, 2025

An unprecedented attack

by

1765 days ago
20200528
Editorial

Editorial

In what was the most vi­cious at­tack on the lo­cal me­dia by a sit­ting Prime Min­is­ter, Dr Kei­th Row­ley yes­ter­day ac­cused the two largest me­dia com­pa­nies of not be­ing in­de­pen­dent but rather danc­ing to the tunes of their own­ers.

Here is the Prime Min­is­ter in his own words: “In Trinidad and To­ba­go we don’t have in­de­pen­dent me­dia hous­es…. what we have are me­dia hous­es that have in­ter­est to pro­tect.”

He went on: “One me­dia house is owned by a busi­ness con­glom­er­ate that has in­ter­est and the Gov­ern­ment has tak­en de­ci­sions that’s un­favourable to their in­ter­est. The oth­er one, right, has busi­ness with the state which the Gov­ern­ment is not fa­cil­i­tat­ing and then ob­vi­ous­ly the Gov­ern­ment is mak­ing en­e­mies be­cause they have in­ter­est to pro­tect, we have in­ter­est to pro­tect.”

We do not pro­pose to speak for our coun­ter­parts on In­de­pen­dence Square who have a record of ably de­fend­ing them­selves against scur­rilous at­tacks. We in Guardian Me­dia vig­or­ous­ly con­demn Dr Row­ley’s di­a­tribe. For more than a cen­tu­ry, we have chron­i­cled the his­to­ry of our na­tion while stand­ing up to hos­tile and rav­ing lead­ers. We will nev­er cow­er from mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tions, slan­der and threats. On be­half of our read­ers, we will re­main res­olute in seek­ing the truth and faith­ful­ly re­port­ing it.

To deal with Dr Row­ley’s at­tack, let us re­in­force that Guardian Me­dia’s jour­nal­ism and ed­i­to­r­i­al poli­cies have al­ways been in­de­pen­dent of our par­ent com­pa­ny, which has main­tained a hands-off ap­proach.

It’s an in­de­pen­dent com­pa­ny which trades on the stock ex­change, with a board of em­i­nent pro­fes­sion­als.

We have seen at­tacks on our lo­cal me­dia be­fore but Dr Row­ley’s is by far the most brazen. Here is a short­list of the sit­ting gov­ern­ments’ great­est hits:

The coun­try’s first prime min­is­ter Dr Er­ic Williams rou­tine­ly at­tacked the Guardian; Bas­deo Pan­day at­tacked then min­is­ter Ken Gor­don per­son­al­ly; George Cham­bers in­fa­mous­ly threw the me­dia out of a PNM meet­ing in Ari­ma.

But Dr Row­ley went a step be­yond, ques­tion­ing the in­tegri­ty of the me­dia for deign­ing to ask ques­tions on how a shipload of fu­el from a state-owned oil com­pa­ny may have end­ed up in Venezuela, not long af­ter the prime min­is­ter met with Venezue­lan vice-pres­i­dent Del­cy Ro­driguez, who has faced stiff sanc­tions from the US and Eu­ro­pean Union.

Jour­nal­ists mere­ly want­ed to know how oil pur­port­ed­ly des­tined for Aru­ba nev­er made its way there and why the Gov­ern­ment’s ac­counts of the in­ci­dent kept shift­ing.

In­stead of ad­dress­ing the ques­tions, Dr Row­ley cut loose, ac­cus­ing the me­dia of “ha­rass­ing peo­ple with lies.” At the end of his rant, we still do not know why a day af­ter his meet­ing with Ro­driguez, pur­port­ed­ly to talk about COVID-19 se­cu­ri­ty mat­ters, Paria Trad­ing Co ini­ti­at­ed the sale of fu­el that may have end­ed up in Venezuela.

We still do not know Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter Stu­art Young de­clared that US Am­bas­sador Joseph Mon­del­lo did not raise with him that T&T might have vi­o­lat­ed the Rio Treaty on­ly to be con­found­ed days lat­er by the am­bas­sador. And we still don’t know why some of Venezuela’s top oil of­fi­cials came to the prime min­is­ter’s of­fice and who might have met with them.

Af­ter decades in pol­i­tics, Dr Row­ley should un­der­stand that re­porters are not paid to pro­vide pub­lic re­la­tions for his Gov­ern­ment, which has a small army of state pro­pa­gan­dists to do so. By ask­ing ques­tions on be­half of the pub­lic, re­porters were mere­ly do­ing their jobs.

We can on­ly won­der why Dr Row­ley chose this mo­ment to launch a broad­side against the me­dia. Does he know that what he said could have a cor­ro­sive ef­fect on our democ­ra­cy? And does he care? Does he ex­pect the me­dia to now cow­er in a cor­ner like a bat­tered vic­tim and not stand up for it­self?

Cit­i­zens need to sit up and take note be­cause when pol­i­tics starts go­ing down this route it im­per­ils the very democ­ra­cy we cher­ish.

As the guardian of democ­ra­cy, we and the peo­ple of Trinidad and To­ba­go will al­ways fight for a vi­brant and free me­dia that will ask the tough ques­tions and hold the pow­er­ful to ac­count. We owe our na­tion no less.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored