JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, May 17, 2025

Digitalisation and structural change

by

Mariano Browne
727 days ago
20230521
 Mariano Browne

Mariano Browne

Nicole Drayton

Mov­ing T&T on­to a sus­tain­able eco­nom­ic growth path re­quires struc­tur­al change. In the midterm re­view, the fi­nance min­is­ter sought to put the best spin pos­si­ble on the coun­try’s short-term eco­nom­ic out­look for 2023, ad­vo­cat­ing the IMF’s growth pro­jec­tion with­out ad­dress­ing the longer-term prospects.

He did not speak to the Gov­ern­ment’s plans for the pe­ri­od 2024 and be­yond. There was no men­tion of Vi­sion 2030 or what bench­marks had been achieved in the roll­out of that plan or if or how the plan was be­ing rolled out. There were no an­nounce­ments of new promis­ing de­vel­op­ments to come, not Drag­on, not Man­a­tee, and noth­ing of the re­fin­ery.

We heard noth­ing of the promis­ing prospects fac­ing NGC in the up­com­ing round of con­tract ne­go­ti­a­tions with petro­chem­i­cal com­pa­nies in Point Lisas. Per­haps he was be­ing cau­tious not want­i­ng to prej­u­dice the ne­go­ti­a­tions. How is NGC go­ing to ad­dress the cur­rent nat­ur­al gas pro­duc­tion short­ages? What can it com­mit to in con­tract ne­go­ti­a­tions if it can­not guar­an­tee a con­tin­u­ous sup­ply? The en­er­gy min­is­ter did not say much to com­ple­ment the IMF’s pos­i­tive 2023 pro­jec­tion. The Cen­tral Bank Gov­er­nor was cau­tious in his com­ments con­firm­ing the turn­around in 2021 and 2022 which was fu­elling ro­bust con­sumer de­mand in 2023.

The good news is that the unions are ac­cept­ing the four per cent wage ne­go­ti­a­tion of­fer for pub­lic sec­tor salaries, even if the PSA has not. This is a prag­mat­ic out­come that has de­fused the dra­ma as­so­ci­at­ed with these long out­stand­ing pub­lic sec­tor salary ne­go­ti­a­tions. But salary in­creas­es must be fund­ed and as ex­pen­di­ture claims mount, so will the deficit.

There are eco­nom­ic sign­posts. The Gov­ern­ment’s in­creased rev­enue for 2021-23 is large­ly as­so­ci­at­ed with the im­prove­ment in the “re­alised” en­er­gy prices re­port­ed by Min­is­ter Im­bert. But the cur­rent trend­line is neg­a­tive, mean­ing that prices for am­mo­nia, oil, and nat­ur­al gas are in de­cline. On cur­rent ev­i­dence, this trend will con­tin­ue. There­fore, pol­i­cy ini­tia­tives must be de­signed to fa­cil­i­tate the no­to­ri­ous “d” word, di­ver­si­fi­ca­tion which the IMF re­port said was nec­es­sary. How can the Gov­ern­ment as­sist in this re­gard? What changes does any ad­min­is­tra­tion un­der­take to fa­cil­i­tate the pri­vate sec­tor in this process?

Gov­ern­ments pro­vide the op­er­at­ing sys­tem that makes a so­ci­ety func­tion. They con­trol the per­mis­sions or li­cences, loose­ly called the “reg­u­la­to­ry frame­work” which on­ly a gov­ern­ment can grant. A so­ci­ety op­er­ates more ef­fi­cient­ly or less so de­pend­ing on how well the sys­tem func­tions. For ex­am­ple, the trans­porta­tion net­work ie, the roads, traf­fic lights, sig­nage and the rules gov­ern­ing how that net­work is main­tained is con­trolled by the Gov­ern­ment. The ve­hi­cles to trans­port goods and ser­vices the coun­try needs must be li­cenced, as must the dri­vers.

Sim­i­lar­ly, births, mar­riage, and death cer­tifi­cates are the in­stru­ments that recog­nise our ex­is­tence, and le­gal iden­ti­ty. Same for land reg­is­tra­tion, the phys­i­cal and spa­tial plan rules gov­ern where and how land should be de­vel­oped and by what stan­dards, or the un­der­ly­ing le­gal frame­work which fa­cil­i­tates all com­mer­cial trans­ac­tions. Sim­i­lar­ly, the jus­tice sys­tem and polic­ing meth­ods can af­fect our lives in many ways. How eas­i­ly we ac­cess those ser­vices is called “the ease of do­ing busi­ness” and how well those sys­tems are ad­min­is­tered af­fects how a so­ci­ety func­tions.

The more ef­fi­cient these ba­sic sys­tems are, the more ef­fi­cient the coun­try. Slow or long re­sponse times dri­ve up costs. This sim­ple, but pow­er­ful frame­work, al­so de­ter­mines a coun­try’s ca­pac­i­ty for growth. A coun­try can on­ly per­form as well as these sys­tems op­er­ate.

Sys­tems just don’t hap­pen. They must be de­signed, test­ed, im­ple­ment­ed and main­tained and de­vel­oped to grow as a so­ci­ety grows. As so­ci­ety mod­ernises, these sys­tems must mod­ernise as well. This brings us to the in­evitabil­i­ty of dig­i­tal­i­sa­tion, the ap­pli­ca­tion of com­put­er tech­nol­o­gy to every­day ac­tiv­i­ties, like ap­ply­ing for pass­ports, trade or im­port li­cences, pay­ing tax­es or fines on­line or sim­ply reg­is­ter­ing com­pa­nies and di­rec­tors.

In short, gov­ern­men­tal dig­i­tal­i­sa­tion ef­forts can have a huge im­pact on com­mer­cial or in­di­vid­ual op­er­a­tions. In this re­gard, we tend to think of “gov­ern­ment” as one and as­sume these mod­erni­sa­tion ef­forts will be per­va­sive, har­monised, and even­ly han­dled. That is im­pos­si­ble as dif­fer­ent sys­tems are run by dif­fer­ent min­istries that op­er­ate as si­los. One ex­cep­tion is the op­er­a­tion of the TTBi­zLink, the T&T trade and busi­ness in­for­ma­tion por­tal, a sin­gle elec­tron­ic win­dow. This sys­tem links sev­er­al dif­fer­ent min­istries which are crit­i­cal in fa­cil­i­tat­ing the trade process; the Min­istries of Trade, Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty, Agri­cul­ture, Health, and of course the Min­istry of Fi­nance.

This “sin­gle elec­tron­ic win­dow” has great­ly fa­cil­i­tat­ed the trade process and a new im­proved ver­sion will be re­leased short­ly. Its great­est weak­ness is that the Cus­toms and Ex­cise Di­vi­sion of the Min­istry of Fi­nance re­mains stub­born­ly “un­in­te­grat­ed” with the SEW af­ter ten years, thus re­duc­ing the val­ue of the sys­tem and lim­it­ing its over­all ef­fec­tive­ness. This ex­em­pli­fies the com­plex­i­ty of “gov­ern­ment” and the dif­fi­cul­ty of hav­ing a whole-of-gov­ern­ment ap­proach.

This in part ex­plains why dig­i­tal­i­sa­tion across var­i­ous gov­ern­ment de­part­ments has been such a patchy ex­pe­ri­ence. Re­cent ex­pe­ri­ence at the cor­po­rate reg­istry at the Min­istry of Le­gal Af­fairs is a salient ex­am­ple of this dif­fi­cul­ty. In the process of com­plet­ing rou­tine an­nu­al re­turns, com­pa­ny di­rec­tors are re­quired to take a pho­to­graph with their ID next to their faces.

Are we in the 21st cen­tu­ry yet?

Mar­i­ano Browne is the CEO of the Arthur Lok Jack Glob­al School of Busi­ness

Commentary


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored