JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, May 30, 2025

Who knows ...?

by

505 days ago
20240111
Dr Bhoendradatt Tewarie

Dr Bhoendradatt Tewarie

One may say that with the pass­ing of Bas­deo Pan­day, for­mer prime min­is­ter, feisty Op­po­si­tion leader be­fore that, and trade union ag­i­ta­tor even be­fore, that we have come to the end of an era in T&T.

But have we en­tered the be­gin­ning of an­oth­er one? I do not know. It is hard to say.

In Eu­ro­pean his­to­ry, we have eras like clas­si­cal and me­dieval, defin­ing a cen­tu­ry or more, at a time. In our time, we are fa­mil­iar with the post-World War II era. In T&T, we talk of the Williams era, or the post-In­de­pen­dence era, or the post-COVID lock­down era.

In T&T’s his­to­ry, 1937 was a wa­ter­shed year in terms of labour ag­i­ta­tion and an­ti-colo­nial re­bel­lion.

But when the na­tion­al­ist move­ment came in 1955 with Dr Er­ic Williams in the lead and won the most seats as the PNM par­ty in the Leg­isla­tive Coun­cil in 1956, Tubal Uri­ah But­ler, who had led ri­ots, and be­came a fugi­tive in 1937, was not part of the new pow­er struc­ture. And while the an­ti-colo­nial re­sis­tance con­tin­ued, the work­ers’ strug­gle got lost, and the era of Williams eclipsed and left be­hind, the era of But­ler. Work­ers’ caus­es were nev­er cen­tral to the poli­cies of the PNM and the DLP, the of­fi­cial op­po­si­tion at the time.

The But­ler era reared its head again though, in 1970 through Makan­dal Dag­ga, who had grown up in the house­hold of his fa­ther, who was an avid and sin­cere But­lerite. And in 1969, the labour move­ment, re­sist­ing the In­dus­tri­al Sta­b­li­sa­tion Act, brought work­ers out in the street in a con­fronta­tion­al mood.

The search for a new po­lit­i­cal or­der was on, with­in the first decade of na­tion­al In­de­pen­dence, and a range of cur­rents was un­leashed. The New World Move­ment had be­gun the in­tel­lec­tu­al dis­course; work­er as­pi­ra­tions through or­gan­ised labour, which had been left be­hind, were search­ing for po­lit­i­cal space; the But­lerite an­ti- colo­nial­ism which was dis­rupt­ed by na­tion­al­ist fer­vour was grop­ing for an an­chor. But in this pe­ri­od too, emerged iden­ti­ty pol­i­tics, afro-cen­tric in na­ture, and, in hind­sight, one might say now, the be­gin­nings of the repa­ra­tions move­ment which is cur­rent­ly gain­ing mo­men­tum; as well as the recog­ni­tion of the fail­ure of the 1956 na­tion­al­ist move­ment to in­clude In­di­ans and poor Africans sin­cere­ly and gen­uine­ly. This is what gave res­o­nance to the march to Ca­roni led by Daa­ga and oth­ers, to reach out to Cen­tral Trinidad, un­der the ban­ner of Africans and In­di­ans unite. Daa­ga had, some weeks be­fore, made a dra­mat­ic vis­it to Beetham, where he had railed at the con­di­tions of liv­ing in what was then known as Shan­ty Town.

Clear­ly, one of Daa­ga’s ob­jec­tives was to heal the wounds of iden­ti­ty, and de­mol­ish di­vi­sive pol­i­tics that pit­ted Africans and In­di­ans against each oth­er in elec­tion bat­tles. From his view, these bat­tles, which re­sult­ed in pre­dictable hol­low vic­to­ries of the PNM and bit­ter and fu­tile loss­es of the DLP, made lit­tle sense.

1970 and im­me­di­ate­ly af­ter, saw an ex­plo­sion of po­lit­i­cal fer­vour for some­thing dif­fer­ent. Rest­less­ness with PNM and DLP pol­i­tics was be­gin­ning to show, through the for­ma­tion of new par­ties with dis­si­dents from the main par­ties, cre­at­ing the Lib­er­al Par­ty and the Work­ers and Farm­ers Par­ty. While sig­nif­i­cant po­lit­i­cal fig­ures at the time like Pe­ter Far­quar, Bal­go­b­in Ramdeen and Taj­mool Ho­sein formed the Lib­er­als, CLR James, Bas­deo Pan­day and Stephen Ma­haraj formed the Work­ers and Farm­ers Par­ty. Stephen Ma­haraj was al­so a But­lerite, CLR James was a Marx­ist and Bas­deo Pan­day a so­cial­ist, not un­like Williams or Rudranath Capildeo.

The im­pact of NJAC in 1970, did not trans­late in­to elec­toral sup­port at any time. And 1971 saw a no-vote cam­paign by the op­po­si­tion forces, with PNM vic­to­ry in all 36 seats. And while the Re­pub­li­can Con­sti­tu­tion of 1976 was be­ing put in place by of­fi­cial­dom, voic­es of op­po­si­tion and dis­cord were grow­ing. Lloyd Best found­ed Tapia, ANR Robin­son formed the DAC, week­ly news­pa­pers start­ed to pro­lif­er­ate, and the ag­i­ta­tion on be­half of sug­ar work­ers be­gan un­der Pan­day, af­ter, the death of Bhadase Sagan Maraj and the de­po­si­tion of Ram­par­tap Singh.

It was in this heady time, when the labour move­ment was be­com­ing ag­i­tat­ed, when new po­lit­i­cal par­ties and po­lit­i­cal per­spec­tives were form­ing, when sus­pi­cion was grow­ing about the mean­ing of na­tion­al In­de­pen­dence, that Pan­day en­tered the po­lit­i­cal fray with the Work­ers and Farm­ers Par­ty, be­came leader of the All Trinidad Sug­ar Es­tates and Fac­to­ry Work­ers’ Trade Union, be­came a sen­a­tor, col­lab­o­rat­ed with oth­er trade unions and union lead­ers and found­ed with them the Unit­ed Labour Front (ULF), which made him the Op­po­si­tion leader af­ter the 1976 elec­tion. It was a time of many storms, much tur­bu­lence and many con­tro­ver­sies and Pan­day was at the cen­tre for four decades.

Who knows what might emerge in the post-Pan­day era in T&T?


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored