JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, March 17, 2025

FACE-TO-FACE

Peter George: Blame Government for the Death of Horse Racing

...calls for con­struc­tion of Ca­roni Rac­ing Com­plex to restart

by

20140809

Lo­cal horse rac­ing is in its death throes, ac­cord­ing to the pres­i­dent of the T&T Book­mak­ers As­so­ci­a­tion Pe­ter George.Blam­ing the Gov­ern­ment for the im­po­si­tion of a ten per cent turnover tax on every punter plac­ing a bet, George said many pun­ters have gone un­der­ground to place il­le­gal bets be­cause of the dis­put­ed tax.In­ter­est­ing­ly, he is sug­gest­ing that the Bet­ting Levy Board in­ves­ti­gate and restart con­struc­tion of the con­tro­ver­sial and scrapped Ca­roni Rac­ing Com­plex to en­sure the sur­vival of the in­dus­try.

Q: Mr George, am I cor­rect in say­ing the lo­cal horse rac­ing in­dus­try in T&T is un­der­go­ing se­ri­ous stress?

A: (At his Ari­api­ta Av­enue of­fice, with an em­phat­ic re­sponse) Yes. That is cor­rect. The vol­ume of bet­ting–par­tic­u­lar­ly in the pri­vate bet­ting shops bet­ter known as bet­ting pools–has dropped be­tween 33 and 45 per cent over the last three years.

What's main­ly re­spon­si­ble for this state of af­fairs?

Well, the rea­son for that is over the years the peo­ple who used to bet on horse rac­ing have now mi­grat­ed to bet­ting on oth­er sports and all ac­tiv­i­ties in­clud­ing soc­cer, foot­ball, what­ev­er. In so do­ing, the lev­el of horse rac­ing has start­ed to de­cline but more im­por­tant, the re­al im­pact on the drop of bet­ting on horse rac­ing is the ex­is­tence of the Gov­ern­ment's ten per cent turnover tax which the punter has to pay since the Bet­ting Levy Board was en­act­ed about 15 years ago.

If my mem­o­ry serves me right, didn't I in­ter­view you around that same time where you had ex­pressed a sim­i­lar fear about the death of this sport be­cause of that same tax is­sue?

That is cor­rect, and that has al­ways been a fear. We have made all sorts of rep­re­sen­ta­tions to the BLB (Bet­ting Levy Board) and to the Gov­ern­ment about the re­moval of the tax be­cause it is im­pact­ing neg­a­tive­ly on the peo­ple who are bet­ting.Pun­ters are not de­sirous of pay­ing that tax each time they place a bet, and they have gone over to bet­ting il­le­gal­ly with un­der­ground book­mak­ers (book­mak­er, book­ie or turf ac­coun­tant is an or­gan­i­sa­tion or a per­son that takes bets on sport­ing and oth­er events at agreed up­on odds).

Il­le­gal­ly?

Yes. Be­cause the un­der­ground book­mak­ers do not charge any tax. So here's a man who wants to bet $100 and who doesn't want to spend $110. And that is get­ting worse. This form of bet­ting is in­creas­ing sub­stan­tial­ly in T&T and there are un­der­ground book­mak­ers even in your own bet­ting shops so­lic­it­ing­pun­ters to bet with them.

So it is a se­ri­ous prob­lem be­cause our vol­ume of bet­ting is drop­ping and ex­pens­es re­main or are get­ting high­er. It is not eco­nom­i­cal­ly vi­able, hence the rea­son why so many bet­ting shops have shut down.

What has been the re­sponse by the board to your (pro­pri­etors of pri­vate bet­ting shops) plight?

We have com­plained to the BLB say­ing, "Look, let's get to­geth­er and get a for­mu­la for a sim­ple flat tax paid year­ly in­stead of this bur­den­some ten per cent on every bet placed. In that way, we would be able to mit­i­gate the un­der­ground bet­ting and to a cer­tain ex­tent be able to stream­line our busi­ness, and the board can bud­get them­selves on the ba­sis of know­ing ex­act­ly how much tax would be col­lect­ed each year. In a way, they like the sug­ges­tion. But the fig­ure they want to charge the bet­ting shops is to­tal­ly un­re­al­is­tic.

How much are they ask­ing for?

They are ask­ing dou­ble for what we are rec­om­mend­ing–we rec­om­mend­ed $2 mil­lion per year, per pool, as the flat tax. The BLB is say­ing that is too small, and they want a to­tal of $35 to $40 mil­lion a year. Now that can­not work.

In terms of em­ploy­ment and gen­er­at­ing rev­enue how are the pools fear­ing?

Many bet­ting shops have closed. Right now we have on­ly 11, and more may close down. I can as­sure you peo­ple have lost their jobs and right now, with 11 shops, the board does not re­alise the sever­i­ty of the prob­lem.The shops em­ploy 750 peo­ple and in­di­rect­ly an­oth­er 250.

Couldn't it be ar­gued that if the shops where shut down, it would be no big thing if that hap­pens...

Right now these bet­ting shops are the bread bas­ket that is keep­ing lo­cal horse rac­ing alive. We con­tribute be­tween $16 and $18 mil­lion per an­num and that mon­ey is used to sus­tain the in­dus­try. If they don't have tax that is be­ing paid by us, there is no doubt the Ari­ma Race Club would be forced to close down them­selves. That is how se­ri­ous it is.

Do you think the board is act­ing on their own or they have to wait on the Gov­ern­ment be­fore act­ing?

No. Based on their terms of ref­er­ence they can act on their own. If there is any­thing over and above their lim­it they will have to get Gov­ern­ment ap­proval. But so far, they have been act­ing on their own.

Is the board try­ing to run you all out of busi­ness?

No. I don't think it is de­lib­er­ate. I think they do not know what they are do­ing. They are un­aware of the prob­lems in this in­dus­try.

Are the book­mak­ers rep­re­sent­ed on the BLB?

Again, the leg­is­la­tion re­quires a mem­ber of the T&T Book­mak­ers As­so­ci­a­tion to sit on the board. I, Pe­ter George, as pres­i­dent of the as­so­ci­a­tion sat on the board for ap­prox­i­mate­ly nine years. Last year, I re­signed be­cause in my opin­ion, sit­ting on the BLB was a waste of time. The as­so­ci­a­tion is not rep­re­sent­ed.I wrote to the rel­e­vant au­thor­i­ties and I think I copied the line min­is­ter who is the Ho­n­ourable Vas­ant Bharath, that we are not in­ter­est­ed in sit­ting on the board.

Ac­tu­al­ly, Min­is­ter Bharath had many meet­ings with us and he is re­al­ly try­ing to be help­ful, but it is a kind of del­i­cate sit­u­a­tion in terms of the agree­ment be­tween the board and the bet­ting shops. So he is be­tween the dev­il and the deep blue sea. I must com­mend the min­is­ter for try­ing, but no im­prove­ment has been found.

Mr George, how long can the 11 sur­viv­ing shops con­tin­ue to car­ry on in this present sce­nario be­fore the death of the in­dus­try, as you would say?

Well, Clevon, un­less the law is changed, the demise of the pri­vate bet­ting shops may go first. I would say in two, three to four years from now, there would be no pri­vate bet­ting shops if the ex­ist­ing law re­mains.Where­as, if the law changes to al­low for a sim­ple rea­son­able one flat an­nu­al tax, hope­ful­ly the pri­vate bet­ting shops may sur­vive. If not, lo­cal rac­ing would not sur­vive be­cause they would have to close un­less the Gov­ern­ment sup­ply them with a lot of mon­ey. And, Clevon, this law it­self is bad law.

Mean­ing?

There is no ten per cent turnover tax nowhere in the world, ex­cept maybe one coun­try which I can­not re­mem­ber at this time. What the board wants to do is to place com­put­ers in all the pri­vate bet­ting shops so that they can quan­ti­fy ex­act­ly how much mon­ey is tak­en by every pool and how much tax they were sup­posed to pay.

They want to bring in com­put­ers from a state en­ter­prise to put in pri­vate busi­ness. That is to­tal­ly un­con­sti­tu­tion­al, but they say they could do it and I think they are pro­ceed­ing with it, but it is not go­ing to be that easy as we are go­ing to take ac­tion against that.

Mr George, isn't there any way you all can make pri­vate bet­ting shops more at­trac­tive to bring back the pun­ters who have gone un­der­ground and who are now bet­ting on sports from for­eign places?

The on­ly an­swer is to drop the ten per cent tax...that is the on­ly way we can sur­vive, and we give pun­ters all the ben­e­fits they are ac­cus­tomed to.The BLB is of the opin­ion the pri­vate bet­ting shops are not pay­ing the right tax and that is ab­solute­ly in­cor­rect.

What about the Ari­ma Race Club?

Lo­cal rac­ing will die even if we con­tin­ue to pay the ten per cent tax, un­less they re­move from those fa­cil­i­ties in Ari­ma. It is derelict, the con­di­tions are ter­ri­ble in­clud­ing the pad­dock, the place hot and sweaty, and its cus­tomer ser­vice needs to be im­proved.

Of course there have been some im­prove­ments, but con­di­tions are not up to stan­dard.

So what is the an­swer?

I think that lo­cal horse rac­ing could be a very nice and suc­cess­ful in­dus­try but it is go­ing to fail in Ari­ma. What they need to do is make rep­re­sen­ta­tions to the Gov­ern­ment to re­sus­ci­tate Ca­roni, which was the orig­i­nal plan for a cen­tral fa­cil­i­ty. A lot of the in­fra­struc­tur­al work is still there and in fair­ly good shape.

The ARC (Ari­ma Race Club) can sell its 70 acres of land to a pri­vate de­vel­op­er, use that mon­ey to con­tin­ue fin­ish­ing Ca­roni and any short­fall, the Gov­ern­ment can do a soft loan and build a nice fa­cil­i­ty down there at Ca­roni.That was a very bad mis­take that for­mer PM George Cham­bers made in stop­ping Ca­roni be­cause at that time we al­ready had $57 mil­lion in the ground. The Gov­ern­ment has a role to play in the sur­vival of horse rac­ing.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored