JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, March 17, 2025

FACE-TO-FACE

Earl Lovelace: T&T should view self as one society

We must be pa­tient with each oth­er

by

20120902

In­ter­na­tion­al­ly ac­claimed writer, au­thor and play­wright Earl Lovelace, is not com­plete­ly hap­py with how we as a so­ci­ety are deal­ing with cer­tain hard ques­tions that we must con­front.The 77-year-old Lovelace, who was born in To­co, is al­so dis­pleased with the lack of the in­sti­tu­tion­al frame­work for thinkers like him­self who could con­tribute in a more tan­gi­ble way to the de­vel­op­ment of their na­tive coun­try.He laments that com­mu­ni­ties such as Laven­tille have not re­al­ly been de­vel­oped since the pe­ri­od of eman­ci­pa­tion.

Q: Mr. Lovelace from the per­spec­tives of a cel­e­brat­ed writer, au­thor, play­wright how do you see Trinidad and To­ba­go in this 50th an­niver­sary of our in­de­pen­dence?

A: (In the back porch of his Cas­cade home Wednes­day morn­ing): Well, I feel there are many things in the coun­try to­day some that are en­cour­ag­ing and some that are of con­cern.

Ok. The bad news first?

Well the bad news is that in terms of the pop­u­lar imag­i­na­tion crimes seems to be the biggest prob­lem...per­haps crime and traf­fic, right? But it seems to me there is much more than crime that is prob­lem­at­ic.

What could be big­ger than crime?

(Ad­just­ing his trade mark shade close to the front of his fore­head.) Where we go­ing as a so­ci­ety to me that is of tremen­dous im­por­tance...what do we want to be? It is not just a so­ci­ety to be tick­ing over as if every­thing is al­right ex­cept a few fel­lows who are com­mit­ting crime. What do we want to do with the so­ci­ety...?

From your some­what unique van­tage point what sort of peo­ple do you be­lieve we want to be?

I don't know what we want to be and we are a lot of peo­ple thrown to­geth­er from dif­fer­ent parts un­der very dif­fer­ent cir­cum­stances and what do we want to do with that? That is the ques­tion be­fore us. I think we have not done too bad­ly but when we view what every­body has brought here as our own then we seem to ac­cept the gifts that we have but we can­not do that with­out a sense of equal­i­ty.

Are we util­is­ing those gifts in a pos­i­tive or neg­a­tive way?

Well it's very dif­fi­cult to an­swer cer­tain ques­tions yes or no, right? And even as I speak things are much more com­plex than that, but what one is con­cerned about is what are we do­ing in re­la­tion to these prob­lems and I don't know as a so­ci­ety what we are do­ing.

Are you sug­gest­ing Mr Lovelace that we are not re­al­ly do­ing any­thing in spite of some things be­ing done?

(Chuck­ling) Well, I don't know...your peo­ple would have to point out to me what ex­act­ly is be­ing done in cer­tain ar­eas.

Are you not sat­is­fied with what is be­ing done let's say in the area of crime fight­ing? (A palm cup­ping the left side of his face)... I think crime should alert us to the fact that some­thing is wrong. The "Bad john" for ex­am­ple was a man in­volved in vi­o­lent ac­tions be­tween him and his fel­low peo­ple. To­day crime seems to be al­so hav­ing that el­e­ment of rob­bery; tak­ing from per­sons, break­ing in­to prop­er­ties as well as oth­er crim­i­nal ac­tiv­i­ties. I am say­ing that to say that delin­quen­cy has al­ways been with us and some­times we have seen the... (paus­ing in a con­tem­pla­tive mode) I am think­ing we have al­ways seen...I am think­ing a lot of things at the same time right? And I think we have come down to ac­cept re­bel­lion as delin­quen­cy but re­bel­lion is not on­ly delin­quen­cy. There might be some peo­ple who might be delin­quent with­in the frame­work of those com­mu­ni­ties.

Which com­mu­ni­ties are you specif­i­cal­ly re­fer­ring to?

We are talk­ing about com­mu­ni­ties that have nev­er re­al­ly had a chance, that have nev­er re­al­ly moved from the state they were in since eman­ci­pa­tion, mean­ing they were nev­er re­al­ly de­vel­oped. We as a peo­ple have nev­er re­al­ly tak­en the whole so­ci­ety and see what is wrong with it and what we can do about it. We leave com­mu­ni­ties to see about them­selves.

Think­ing of any one place in par­tic­u­lar?

For in­stance Laven­tille, is a name that will jump up as a sym­bol­ic name if you want, it is a place that has pro­duced a lot but has re­mained large­ly in the same kind of way.

Couldn't the ar­gu­ment be made that gov­ern­ments have failed to do just that over the years?

Well this is an­oth­er prob­lem; who is the gov­ern­ment? That is one way of look­ing at it and in­deed it is true that cer­tain gov­ern­ments have not done as much as they should, right? But it is a larg­er prob­lem and the con­cern of the so­ci­ety be­longs to the so­ci­ety and how are we or­gan­ised to deal with them.

Care to ex­pand on that point?

If you have a prob­lem in let's say in Ca­roni, it is not Ca­roni's prob­lem alone. I want to see it as the so­ci­ety's prob­lem. Sim­i­lar­ly in Laven­tille, or wher­ev­er and if we be­gin to look at things in that fash­ion we will be­gin to bring the re­sources at least of imag­i­na­tion, to bear on some of these ques­tions.

Is it al­so a case of suc­ces­sive ad­min­is­tra­tions fail­ing to in­spire peo­ple to help them­selves in a more mean­ing­ful man­ner?

Well, in a way I will say yes. (Cast­ing his eyes to the ceil­ing) I don't think we have been in­spired, (A heavy sigh) Well, I don't know...we have done more in­spir­ing rather than be­ing in­spired (laughs). I am think­ing of ideas about where we are and I am think­ing in­ci­den­tal­ly of CLR James, and al­most his to­tal ab­sence from even the land­scape of thought that is be­ing pre­sent­ed at this mo­ment. You see Clevon, you are ask­ing me a lot ques­tions which might ap­pear to be straight­for­ward, sim­ple and so on, but they re­quire a lot of not on­ly thought but ex­pla­na­tion...

Mr Lovelace I seem to de­tect that you feel we are plac­ing too much em­pha­sis on gov­ern­ment and its role in our de­vel­op­ment as a peo­ple?

Yeah. I feel that we have placed too much em­pha­sis on what we call gov­ern­ment, you know, and where are we in this whole sto­ry? We talk about our­selves as though we are a long-stand­ing coun­try. This is a very young coun­try; 50 years old. We have been in en­slave­ment three times as long as we have been in­de­pen­dent so it is re­al­ly a very young coun­try with a lot of peo­ple who are new to pow­er. Peo­ple, who have nev­er re­al­ly had pow­er, peo­ple who have had pow­er and pa­rad­ed pow­er and felt them­selves en­ti­tled to pow­er. So there are many fac­tors here and we have, in a kind of way, to be pa­tient with each oth­er.

Mr Lovelace your works have been ac­claimed world­wide you hav­ing won many writ­ers' awards and so on. Do you be­lieve that thinkers such as your­self and oth­er lo­cals who have done well in this sphere are be­ing suf­fi­cient­ly used in cre­at­ing a think­ing so­ci­ety and all what that en­tails?

No. We are not do­ing suf­fi­cient of that...that as­pect of our lives is not even be­ing pre­sent­ed. What we're get­ting is en­ter­tain­ment. En­ter­tain­ment is fine too but en­ter­tain­ment is not all there is. What is re­quired is a so­ci­ety that is think­ing and en­gag­ing in deal­ing with the se­ri­ous ques­tions, a so­ci­ety that is con­cerned that when it be­gins to look at its writ­ers, artists gen­er­al­ly and so on, it be­gins to look at it­self.

Nat­u­ral­ly you would thinkers like your­self to be tapped as we pro­ceed to build­ing a bet­ter and pros­per­ous so­ci­ety?

Yes. And it says some­thing aw­ful about a so­ci­ety where peo­ple who have been in the fore­front of imag­in­ing a bet­ter coun­try there is no in­sti­tu­tion­al means as by which this hap­pens. It shouldn't be be­cause you are in the favour of a gov­ern­ment or in the favour of some­body (Sud­den­ly rais­ing his voice.) Who the hell are these peo­ple to be in favour of or to favour you?!!! (Chuck­le.) There should be some in­sti­tu­tion­al means by which this is done. We are a small coun­try and peo­ple do as though they can­not find you. How they can­not find you? This is a very small place when they want to find you they will find you.

Mr Lovelace if one could peer through you as the prover­bial crys­tal ball where do you see Trinidad and To­ba­go in the next 50 years?

I think we have to have a lot more con­ver­sa­tions, we need to talk a lot more to each oth­er and raise re­al hard ques­tions and I think we too have been a so­ci­ety that has avoid­ed the hard ques­tions be­cause we don't want to make some­body feel bad or it is not con­ve­nient to the sta­tus quo.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored