JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, February 26, 2025

Political games and gamesmanship

by

Guardian Media Limited
38 days ago
20250119

Democ­ra­cy is a messy busi­ness. In the House of Com­mons in 1947, Win­ston Churchill said that many forms of gov­ern­ment had been tried, and no one could pre­tend that democ­ra­cy was ei­ther per­fect or wise. Al­so, that democ­ra­cy was the worst form of gov­ern­ment “ex­cept for all the oth­ers that have been tried.”

Its ad­van­tage is that it puts the in­ter­ests of those be­ing gov­erned above those do­ing the gov­ern­ing. It pro­vides a mech­a­nism for po­lit­i­cal par­tic­i­pa­tion and rep­re­sen­ta­tion by al­low­ing cit­i­zens to se­lect their rep­re­sen­ta­tives.

Through this process, cit­i­zens have a voice in shap­ing the opin­ions that will guide de­ci­sion-mak­ing by elect­ed rep­re­sen­ta­tives. Cit­i­zens vote, run for of­fice, and in­flu­ence the de­ci­sion-mak­ing process. Elect­ed rep­re­sen­ta­tives are ac­count­able to the cit­i­zens, al­low­ing the Gov­ern­ment to re­flect the wish­es and needs of the cit­i­zen­ry.

At least that is the the­o­ry. To achieve this ob­jec­tive, the ba­sic rights and free­doms (free speech, the right to as­sem­ble, and re­li­gious choice) must be re­flect­ed, guar­an­teed, and pro­tect­ed in the con­sti­tu­tion­al and le­gal frame­work.

Pro­tec­tion of these rights and free­doms is en­sured by sep­a­rat­ing the pow­ers of the ex­ec­u­tive, leg­isla­tive and ju­di­cial arms. This en­sures mu­tu­al over­sight, trans­paren­cy, ac­count­abil­i­ty and fair­ness in gov­ern­ment.

Trans­paren­cy and ac­count­abil­i­ty are re­quired of all the pub­lic in­sti­tu­tions in­volved in cre­at­ing a de­mo­c­ra­t­ic so­ci­ety and in sup­port­ing struc­tures such as po­lit­i­cal par­ties.

If the un­der­ly­ing in­sti­tu­tions, like po­lit­i­cal par­ties, suf­fer from po­lit­i­cal po­lar­i­sa­tion or deep di­vi­sions, it would be dif­fi­cult to achieve con­sen­sus on chal­leng­ing is­sues. This could erode trust in de­mo­c­ra­t­ic in­sti­tu­tions.

Sim­i­lar­ly, the in­flu­ence of monied spe­cial in­ter­ests with­in a po­lit­i­cal par­ty could lead to out­comes that favour nar­row in­ter­ests rather than the pub­lic good. This could lead to a per­cep­tion of un­due in­flu­ence and cor­rup­tion with­in in­di­vid­ual par­ties that would fol­low a win­ning par­ty in­to gov­ern­ment and un­der­mine the in­tegri­ty of the de­mo­c­ra­t­ic process.

An in­her­ent weak­ness of democ­ra­cies is the ten­den­cy to fo­cus on short-term is­sues dri­ven by the elec­toral cy­cle. Em­pha­sis­ing the short term of­ten leads to in­ad­e­quate re­spons­es to long-term chal­lenges like crime, in­fra­struc­ture de­vel­op­ment, fis­cal sta­bil­i­ty, and cli­mate change as elect­ed of­fi­cials pri­ori­tise poli­cies that yield im­me­di­ate re­sults at the ex­pense of long-term plan­ning and sus­tain­abil­i­ty.

This is a gen­er­al elec­tion year for T&T, and these is­sues have be­come more pal­pa­ble. The two main po­lit­i­cal par­ties have lead­er­ship suc­ces­sion is­sues that have been pa­pered over rather than set­tled. The lead­er­ship chal­lenge with­in the UNC looks far from set­tled, with a thin ve­neer of co­he­sion to give the ap­pear­ance of par­ty uni­ty. The sit­u­a­tion in the PNM ap­pears the same.

Al­though the Prime Min­is­ter has an­nounced his in­ten­tion to re­sign, the tim­ing of his de­par­ture is im­pre­cise, sug­gest­ing un­fin­ished busi­ness. The on­go­ing machi­na­tions with­in the par­ty in the in­ter­reg­num sug­gest that the de­lay is to en­sure that the PNM gen­er­al elec­tion can­di­dates do not yield a po­ten­tial chal­lenger to his hand-picked suc­ces­sor.

Sim­i­lar­ly, the egre­gious swipe at the TTPS dur­ing the de­bate on the SoE in Par­lia­ment in­di­cates that there was nev­er any se­ri­ous plan to ad­dress the crime sit­u­a­tion and the SoE was de­signed to give the ap­pear­ance of co­or­di­nat­ed ac­tion. The coun­try faces se­ri­ous long-term eco­nom­ic and so­cial is­sues that have not been ad­dressed. The two main po­lit­i­cal par­ties need to do much more to demon­strate that ei­ther par­ty is a cred­i­ble in­stru­ment to ad­dress the coun­try’s dif­fi­cult fu­ture. 


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored