JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, June 3, 2025

Can T&T afford a $30-an-hour minimum wage?

by

712 days ago
20230622

In his an­nu­al Labour Day ad­dress to work­ers on Mon­day at Char­lie King Junc­tion in Fyz­abad, An­cel Ro­get, the head of the Joint Trade Union Move­ment (JTUM), called for the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage of T&T to be in­creased from $17.50 to $30 an hour.

In per­cent­age terms, Mr Ro­get’s call would amount to a 71.42 per cent in­crease in the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage.

As­sum­ing an eight-hour work­day, the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage of $17.50 an hour amounts to $140 a day, $700 a week and $2,800 a month.

Giv­en the es­ca­la­tion in the cost of liv­ing in the last two years, mak­ing ends meet must be very dif­fi­cult for a sin­gle par­ent earn­ing the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage.

The Cen­tral Sta­tis­ti­cal Of­fice (CSO) es­ti­mates that the av­er­age price of food and non-al­co­holic bev­er­ages in­creased by 20.81 per cent in the two years be­tween April 2021 and April 2023.

The CSO al­so es­ti­mates that the cost of trans­porta­tion in­creased by 17.25 per cent be­tween April 2021 and April 2023.

The all-items in­dex, which is the mea­sure­ment of the so-called head­line in­fla­tion rate, was 11.33 per cent high­er in April 2023 than in April 2021.

His­to­ry of min­i­mum

wage in­creas­es

Ac­cord­ing to the Min­istry of Labour web­site, the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage rate was in­tro­duced in T&T in April 1998.

Here, ac­cord­ing to the Min­istry of Labour web­site, are the changes in the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage rate over the last 25 years:

* The na­tion­al min­i­mum was first es­tab­lished at $7 per hour in 1998 and was sub­se­quent­ly in­creased to $8 per hour in Jan­u­ary 2003. That was a 14.28 per cent in­crease over a pe­ri­od of close to five years;

* The min­i­mum wage was in­creased from $8 to $9 per hour in March 2005, which was an in­crease of 12.5 per cent in a lit­tle over two years;

* The na­tion­al min­i­mum wage was in­creased from $9 per hour to $12.50 per hour with ef­fect from Jan­u­ary 2010. That is an in­crease of 38.88 per cent in a lit­tle un­der five years;

* Five years lat­er, the min­i­mum wage was in­creased from $12.50 per hour to $15 per hour with ef­fect from Jan­u­ary 2015. That was a 20 per cent in­crease af­ter five years; and

* On De­cem­ber 1, 2019, the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage was in­creased from $15 to $17.50 per hour, which was a 16.66 per cent in­crease af­ter near­ly five years.

What is in­ter­est­ing is that in dis­clos­ing the Gov­ern­ment’s plan to in­crease the min­i­mum wage to $17.50 an hour, which he did in the 2020 bud­get pre­sen­ta­tion de­liv­ered on Oc­to­ber 7, 2019, Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert said: “This mea­sure will ben­e­fit ap­prox­i­mate­ly 194,000 per­sons in the work­force.”

Ac­cord­ing to the Cen­tral Bank’s da­ta cen­tre, the labour force in T&T in 2019 was 617,300. If the Fi­nance Min­is­ter’s work­force is the same as the Cen­tral Bank’s labour force, then peo­ple earn­ing the min­i­mum wage con­sti­tut­ed 31.42 per cent of the labour/work force in 2019. That near­ly one-third of the work­force (labour force) in 2019 would have ben­e­fit­ted from the in­crease in the min­i­mum wage sug­gests that near­ly one-third of the work­force (labour force) was earn­ing the min­i­mum wage four years ago.

By my cal­cu­la­tion, and start­ing from a base of $7 an hour in 1998, the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage rate is 150 per cent high­er in 2023 than it was 25 years ear­li­er.

The na­tion­al min­i­mum wage has been in­creased five times in the 20 years since the first in­crease in 2003. That sug­gests an in­crease in the wage on av­er­age once every four years. If that is cor­rect, T&T should be in line for an in­crease in the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage this year or next year.

Should the in­crease be the 71.42 per cent in­di­cat­ed by Mr Ro­get in his Labour Day ad­dress?

I think not be­cause T&T does not have a tra­di­tion of grant­i­ng large, one-time in­creas­es in the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage.

Al­so, be­fore grant­i­ng any in­crease in the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage, econ­o­mists from the Gov­ern­ment, the Cen­tral Bank, busi­ness groups and the labour or­gan­i­sa­tions need to study the im­pact of large, one-time in­creas­es in the min­i­mum wage on the rate of in­fla­tion and the stan­dard of liv­ing of coun­tries. Might I sug­gest that those econ­o­mists start by look­ing at the re­cent ex­pe­ri­ences of Ar­genti­na and Turkey?

But a more mod­er­ate in­crease in the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage is cer­tain­ly re­quired with­in the next six months. I would sug­gest a 20 per cent in­crease that would take the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage from $17.50 now to $21. The six-month time frame would be nec­es­sary for econ­o­mists to con­duct a prop­er analy­sis of the im­pact of min­i­mum-wage in­creas­es on in­fla­tion rates and cor­po­rate tax col­lec­tion. That analy­sis should start with T&T’s own ex­pe­ri­ence of the im­pact that in­creas­ing the min­i­mum wage has had on the coun­try’s in­fla­tion rate.

Process of in­creas­ing

the min­i­mum wage

An­oth­er is­sue is whether the Gov­ern­ment has the struc­ture in place to in­crease the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage.

The Min­i­mum Wages Act, which is dat­ed June 18, 1976, states at sec­tion 3, that the Min­is­ter of Labour may “fix min­i­mum wages and terms and con­di­tions of ser­vice for any class of work­ers gen­er­al­ly or for any class of work­ers in a par­tic­u­lar in­dus­try or un­der­tak­ing or where sat­is­fied that it is nec­es­sary to do so, fix a na­tion­al min­i­mum wage ap­plic­a­ble to work­ers gen­er­al­ly.”

At sec­tion 4, the Act states that the Min­is­ter of Labour SHALL ap­point a Min­i­mum Wages Board.

This board SHALL con­sist of sev­en mem­bers in­clud­ing one mem­ber nom­i­nat­ed by the as­so­ci­a­tions most rep­re­sen­ta­tive of em­ploy­ers, one mem­ber rep­re­sent­ed by the as­so­ci­a­tions most rep­re­sen­ta­tive of labour and one Gov­ern­ment rep­re­sen­ta­tive.

Sec­tion 6 of the Act states the Min­i­mum Wages Board: “SHALL ad­vise and make rec­om­men­da­tions to the min­is­ter on all mat­ters re­lat­ing to the fix­ing of min­i­mum wages and terms and con­di­tions of ser­vice.”

Has the law been bro­ken by not hav­ing a Min­i­mum Wages Board in place to ad­vise and make rec­om­men­da­tions to the Min­is­ter on the fix­ing of a min­i­mum wage?

That ques­tion is on­ly asked be­cause the Min­istry of Labour’s web­site ref­er­ences for­mer Min­is­ter of Labour Jen­nifer Bap­tiste-Primus de­liv­er­ing in­stru­ments of ap­point­ment to the “new­ly ap­point­ed Min­i­mum Wages Board” on Tues­day, May 16, 2017. That board was ap­point­ed for a pe­ri­od of three years. Has a new board been ap­point­ed?


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored