JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 15, 2025

Why the Ukrainian war matters to all of us

by

Curtis Williams
1107 days ago
20220303

Cur­tis Williams

cur­tis.williams@guardian.co.tt

The in­va­sion of Ukraine by Rus­sia has sent shock­waves around the world. It is, af­ter all, war on Eu­ro­pean soil, on a scale now seen since 1945 and in­volves the largest mil­i­tary in Eu­rope and one of the largest coun­tries on the con­ti­nent.

It is al­so a war among the Slav­ic peo­ple and the com­men­ta­tors have wast­ed no time in re­mind­ing the west­ern world that these Ukraini­ans are peo­ple who look like them and must be pro­tect­ed from the in­vaders.

T&T’s po­si­tion as ar­tic­u­lat­ed by our Am­bas­sador to the Unit­ed Na­tions is that the war is un­pro­voked and a breach of in­ter­na­tion­al law. Ac­cord­ing to our am­bas­sador it is al­so im­por­tant to coun­tries like ours who re­ly on the rule of law to pro­tect us from larg­er coun­tries that may sim­ply want to claim ter­ri­to­ry.

It is an im­por­tant point and one that has shaped T&T’s for­eign pol­i­cy for decades. It is why the Kei­th Row­ley ad­min­is­tra­tion, some years ago, came out against Venezuela’s at­tempt to bul­ly Guyana and claim part of that coun­try’s ter­ri­to­ry as its own.

So the war in Ukraine has im­por­tance for T&T on the geopo­lit­i­cal side and so far the coun­try has ac­quit­ted it­self well in adopt­ing a clear po­si­tion on the is­sue.

But the cri­sis in Ukraine po­ten­tial­ly has sig­nif­i­cant im­pli­ca­tions for the T&T econ­o­my.

As the 2021 IMF coun­try re­port not­ed, the pan­dem­ic sig­nif­i­cant­ly im­pact­ed the econ­o­my with a mas­sive 7.4 con­trac­tion in 2020 and a pro­ject­ed one per cent de­cline in 2021. It must be not­ed most econ­o­mists be­lieve the ac­tu­al­ly con­trac­tion in 2021 was clos­er to three per cent.

The IMF blamed weak­er de­mand for en­er­gy prod­ucts in the first half of 2021, the clo­sure of some petro­chem­i­cal plants and low­er out­put from the en­er­gy sec­tor as ma­jor rea­sons for the con­trac­tion.

“En­er­gy pro­duc­tion de­clined sig­nif­i­cant­ly in 2020 and fur­ther in ear­ly 2021 due to unan­tic­i­pat­ed main­te­nance ac­tiv­i­ty in some en­er­gy fa­cil­i­ties and the clo­sure of sev­er­al petro­chem­i­cal plants. Com­bined with weak­er glob­al de­mand and the drop in en­er­gy prices in 2020, these fac­tors sub­stan­tial­ly low­ered en­er­gy ex­ports and rev­enues,” the coun­try re­port read.

Fur­ther, T&T’s over­all fis­cal deficit widened to 11.6 per cent of GDP in FY2020 from 3.7 per cent of GDP in FY2019, dri­ven most­ly by low­er en­er­gy tax pro­ceeds and out­lays to mit­i­gate the pan­dem­ic. At 10.1 per cent of GDP, the over­all fis­cal deficit in FY2021 re­mained high due to con­tin­ued weak rev­enue per­for­mance not­ed the IMF.

“As a re­sult of the large deficits and the deep GDP con­trac­tion, cen­tral gov­ern­ment debt rose sharply from 45.4 per cent in FY2019 to 66 per cent of GDP in FY2021. Pub­lic debt rose to 87 per cent of GDP, sig­nif­i­cant­ly sur­pass­ing the gov­ern­ment’s soft pub­lic debt tar­get of 65 per cent of GDP” said the IMF re­port.

So we are fac­ing ma­jor hur­dles in the coun­try. We have bur­geon­ing pub­lic debt with a debt to GDP ra­tion of 87 per cent, much high­er than the rec­om­mend­ed 70 per cent as the out­er lim­it.

We have faced low en­er­gy rev­enues due to de­pressed prices in 2020 and the first half of 2021 and per­haps more im­por­tant­ly low en­er­gy out­put.

The fail­ure of suc­ces­sive gov­ern­ments to trans­form the T&T econ­o­my means that the coun­try still re­lies on oil and gas rev­enue for more than 70 per cent of its for­eign ex­change and al­so de­pends on en­er­gy rents for a sig­nif­i­cant por­tion of gov­ern­ment rev­enue.

The prob­lem is over the last sev­en years the ad­min­is­tra­tion, has at best, failed in its ef­forts to get more pro­duc­tion go­ing in both oil and gas and while the pan­dem­ic did have an im­pact on bpTT’s projects, T&T’s oil and gas pro­duc­tion has fall­en sig­nif­i­cant­ly over the last sev­en years.

The war in Ukraine re­sult­ed in high en­er­gy prices. On Tues­day, the price of Brent set­tled at over US$105 while West Texas In­ter­me­di­ate was over US$102 a bar­rel.

These prices are fu­ture prices but it shows that the mar­ket an­tic­i­pates chal­lenges with sup­ply due to the on­go­ing con­flict and with Rus­sia be­ing one of the world’s largest pro­duc­ers of both oil and gas, there is a glob­al sen­ti­ment that the val­ue of a bar­rel of oil at this stage is over US$100.

My own feel­ing is that with the lack of sanc­tions on Rus­sia’s oil and gas in­dus­try and the sym­bi­ot­ic re­la­tion­ship be­tween Russ­ian en­er­gy and Eu­rope’s need for the com­modi­ties that the oil and gas will con­tin­ue to flow and all things be­ing equal there will be some sta­bil­i­sa­tion of the prices over time.

But it means that the T&T gov­ern­ment and oil com­pa­nies op­er­at­ing here, in­clud­ing state-owned Her­itage, must be smil­ing all the way to the bank.

To un­der­stand the im­pact one can look at the Min­is­ter of Fi­nance bud­get pre­sen­ta­tion. The Min­is­ter of Fi­nance ex­pect­ed that oil prices would av­er­age US$65 a bar­rel dur­ing the fis­cal 2022. So far for the fi­nan­cial year crude prices have av­er­age about US$85 a bar­rel. If we break it down fur­ther, at US$65 a bar­rel the Min­is­ter of fi­nance was not ex­pect­ing any Sup­ple­men­tal Pe­tro­le­um Tax­es. By a rough back of the en­ve­lope cal­cu­la­tion, in the last five months the Min­is­ter should have re­ceived in SPT alone be­tween $250 mil­lion to $300 mil­lion that he would not have ex­pect­ed.

The chal­lenge he will face are two-fold. Part of that ad­di­tion­al SPT will be writ­ten off on the in­creased sub­sidy for fu­el at the pump. Ad­di­tion­al­ly he bud­get­ed for over 80,000 bar­rels of oil per day. I had warned the Min­is­ter in Oc­to­ber that he would not achieve his es­ti­mates on pro­duc­tion and true to form the Min­is­ter’s num­bers are prov­ing wrong, with crude pro­duc­tion av­er­ag­ing a mere 60,000 bar­rels of oil per day. Even if he was blind-sided by the BHP débâ­cle, he should have known that 80,000 was not pos­si­ble at this stage.

So the high­er prices caused by the war and its pre­lude will help but the net ef­fect of low­er pro­duc­tion could still leave Mr Im­bert in a pick­le.

Sim­i­lar­ly nat­ur­al gas and petro­chem­i­cal prices have re­mained high.

Again, as he has done in every bud­get since 2016, Mr Im­bert has got­ten his pro­duc­tion fig­ures wrong. The high­er prices are a ma­jor help but the wor­ry is the low nat­ur­al gas pro­duc­tion. That hurts with tax­es at the well head, tax­es on prof­its, tax­es on the petro­chem­i­cal com­pa­nies.

In all of this we have not con­sid­ered loss­es brought for­ward. In oth­er words, we should be in a boom­ing econ­o­my and while the open­ing up of the rest of the econ­o­my will help, the IMF’s five per cent growth pre­dic­tion is in se­ri­ous doubt.

This takes us to the ele­phant in the room. That of ris­ing in­fla­tion. With many peo­ple on fixed salaries that are now at least five years old and with glob­al prices in­creas­ing, this war in Ukraine threat­ens to add to that in­fla­tion.

High­er oil prices will lead to high­er ship­ping costs and the pass­ing on of these in­creas­es to the con­sumers. It will like­ly re­sult in high­er wheat prices and with it flour prices, so from roti, to bread, to pas­tries, the pos­si­bil­i­ty ex­ist of high­er prices.

To seek to re­duce in­fla­tion­ary pres­sure in the west one can ex­pect high­er in­ter­est rates. That will have im­pli­ca­tions for T&T’s for­eign pub­lic debt and the need for more forex to ser­vice that debt. It will al­so lead to the Cen­tral Bank hav­ing to raise the re­po rate, mak­ing in­ter­est rates high­er, cost of bor­row­ing for in­di­vid­u­als and busi­ness­es greater and po­ten­tial­ly im­pact both the spend­ing pow­er of in­di­vid­u­als and busi­ness­es and the tim­ing of in­vest­ments.

It is al­so like­ly to neg­a­tive­ly im­pact the val­ue of our sov­er­eign wealth fund.

So Ukraine mat­ters and even though we have lit­tle or no trad­ing links with the two Slav­ic coun­tries, what hap­pens there will im­pact cit­i­zens in T&T.

The chal­lenge is whether the gov­ern­ment and the coun­try will awake for its slum­ber and re­alise that eco­nom­ic trans­for­ma­tion is our on­ly chance and pre­tend­ing every­thing is okay, or be­ing afraid to of­fend the max­i­mum leader will not help our cause.

The Russ­ian oli­garchs are be­gin­ning to find this out the hard way.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored