JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, April 13, 2025

Fired unvaccinated workers to get salaries

by

625 days ago
20230728
Embattled workers of the Waste Disposals (2023) Limited and Envirotech Holdings Limited stand with officials of the Communication Workers’ Union following their successful hearing before the Industrial Court, yesterday. In picture are, from left, back row, Kanisha Coltes, Gerard Wilson and Deryck Mason. From left, front row, Krystle Khan, Clyde Elder, CWU Secretary General and Janelle Whiskey.

Embattled workers of the Waste Disposals (2023) Limited and Envirotech Holdings Limited stand with officials of the Communication Workers’ Union following their successful hearing before the Industrial Court, yesterday. In picture are, from left, back row, Kanisha Coltes, Gerard Wilson and Deryck Mason. From left, front row, Krystle Khan, Clyde Elder, CWU Secretary General and Janelle Whiskey.

AKASH SAMAROO

Se­nior Re­porter

akash.sama­roo@cnc3.co.tt

Un­til the le­gal­i­ty of their ter­mi­na­tions is de­ter­mined, six peo­ple are to con­tin­ue re­ceiv­ing their salaries from the com­pa­nies which fired them due to a re­fusal to take the COVID-19 vac­cine.

Yes­ter­day, the In­dus­tri­al Court not on­ly ruled in favour of the em­ploy­ees but im­posed fur­ther fines on Waste Dis­pos­als (2023) Ltd and En­vi­rotech Hold­ings Lim­it­ed.

The work­ers were rep­re­sent­ed by the Com­mu­ni­ca­tion Work­ers’ Union (CWU), and its sec­re­tary gen­er­al Clyde El­der told Guardian Me­dia that they are pleased with the rul­ing, which he de­scribed as ev­i­dence that the jus­tice sys­tem does work.

“This is ba­si­cal­ly a land­mark rul­ing where we have work­ers be­ing pro­tect­ed with their salaries be­ing re­stored, their em­ploy­ment be­ing re­stored, and in­di­vid­u­als of the com­pa­ny be­ing fined for dis­obey­ing the or­ders of the court. So we are very hap­py with this judg­ment, we are pleased with this judg­ment, we will not be sur­prised if they don’t pay and of course there are con­se­quences to that too.

“But we be­lieve that to­day jus­tice was served and the whole ques­tion about forc­ing vac­ci­na­tion up­on work­ers while that is to be de­ter­mined. You can­not lock out work­ers and uni­lat­er­al­ly change the terms and con­di­tions of their em­ploy­ment at your whims and fan­cies,” El­der said.

El­der ex­plained that yes­ter­day’s hear­ing was the third time the union had to bring the two com­pa­nies be­fore the court for con­tempt. El­der said in De­cem­ber 2021 they ap­proached the In­dus­tri­al Court for an in­junc­tion to al­low the work­ers to be paid and for their terms of em­ploy­ment to re­main un­touched un­til the court hears the union’s ap­pli­ca­tion for an in­dus­tri­al re­la­tions of­fence (IRO). The in­junc­tion was grant­ed, how­ev­er the CWU again re­turned to court in Jan­u­ary 2022 af­ter the waste dis­pos­al com­pa­nies did not ho­n­our the court’s rul­ing to pay the em­ploy­ees.

Even­tu­al­ly, the six work­ers were paid salaries for De­cem­ber 2021 and Jan­u­ary 2022 but pay­ments stopped soon af­ter. Again, the CWU went to court for an­oth­er con­tempt of court hear­ing where the com­pa­nies were then fined $20,000 each. Soon af­ter, in March, the six em­ploy­ees were ter­mi­nat­ed.

The five em­ploy­ees who worked at Waste Dis­pos­als (2023) Ltd are Deryck Ma­son, Ger­ard Wil­son, Julien Si­mon, Lester Quashie and Shel­don Primus. While the lone En­vi­rotech work­er is Janelle Whiskey.

Yes­ter­day, In­dus­tri­al Court judges, Her­bert Sover­all, Al­bert Ab­erdeen and Melvin Daniel or­dered that the em­ploy­er’s ap­pli­ca­tion on con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty and ju­ris­dic­tion be dis­missed, the pay­ments of wages to the work­ers be con­tin­ued un­til the IRO is heard and de­ter­mined in keep­ing with the con­sent or­der and that the em­ploy­ers and named of­fi­cials are guilty of con­tempt.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored