JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, April 4, 2025

Fun Splash owner pledges to support D’amari’s family

by

556 days ago
20230927

Se­nior Re­porter

kevon.felmine@guardian.co.tt

Fun Splash Wa­ter Park own­er Vi­jay Ra­mai said yes­ter­day that he had reached out to the fam­i­ly of five-year-old D’amari Jef­fery, who drowned at his fa­cil­i­ty on Sun­day.

Ra­mai said he gave his com­mit­ment to stay in touch with the fam­i­ly dur­ing their pe­ri­od of grief and to work with them to help al­le­vi­ate their bur­den.

D’amari died while un­der­go­ing treat­ment at the San Fer­nan­do Gen­er­al Hos­pi­tal af­ter some­one found him float­ing in a pool at the Debe fa­cil­i­ty, hav­ing gone there with his moth­er, Ani­ka George, and oth­er rel­a­tives to cel­e­brate his cousin’s sec­ond birth­day.

Ra­mai said the drown­ing was the first death in the com­pa­ny’s 13-year ex­is­tence, adding they would now have to en­force new rules on the use of pools at the fa­cil­i­ty.

“Our ex­pe­ri­ence (in the in­dus­try) for the last 25 years, par­ents have left their kids and be­come de­pen­dent on pool at­ten­dants. They car­ry a cer­tain role, but the de­gree of risk will change over time.

“Wa­ter parks are high-risk, as a lot of peo­ple are not able to see the dan­gers. Be­cause this is our first death at the wa­ter park, we will im­ple­ment new strate­gies to re­duce risk,” Ra­mai said.

He said an im­me­di­ate re­sponse will be the en­force­ment of a new height lim­it on pools at the fa­cil­i­ty.

Ra­mai said he would not cast blame on any­one, as he was treat­ing the in­ci­dent as an ac­ci­dent. He said it was al­ready a trau­mat­ic in­ci­dent and Fun Splash re­gret­ted it hap­pened.

Ac­cord­ing to re­ports, an adult saw D’amari mo­tion­less in the adult pool around 4 pm. Emer­gency Med­ical Tech­ni­cians who ar­rived on the scene at­tempt­ed to re­sus­ci­tate him and took him to the hos­pi­tal, where he was even­tu­al­ly pro­nounced dead.

And while there is now a pub­lic de­bate over who was re­spon­si­ble for Jef­fery’s death, life­guard su­per­vi­sor Lennox Dwari­ka said all wa­ter parks and pub­lic pools should have life­guards for their op­er­a­tions.

Re­ports said there were signs at the fa­cil­i­ty say­ing there must be full-time su­per­vi­sion of chil­dren, as there were no life­guards on du­ty and that peo­ple un­der five feet must be able to swim. There were pool at­ten­dants on du­ty, but rel­a­tives ques­tioned why there were no life­guards.

Dwari­ka told Guardian Me­dia yes­ter­day that while he was un­sure what laws gov­erned these busi­ness­es, it was ad­vis­able to have trained per­son­nel avail­able at all times. He ex­plained that life­guards un­der­stood that in­ci­dents in wa­ter could hap­pen in the blink of an eye, es­pe­cial­ly where there was sig­nif­i­cant depth. He said life­guards al­so con­sid­ered drown­ing a pre­ventable oc­cur­rence.

“You must have some­one who is con­stant­ly su­per­vis­ing and look­ing af­ter pa­trons at these parks and wa­ter parks. By ex­ten­sion, what one must ad­here to is that par­ents should su­per­vise their chil­dren, and it should be with­in the lim­i­ta­tion of where chil­dren can bathe and play,” Dwari­ka said.

While many adults were in and around the pool, he said, they may not al­ways be fam­i­ly mem­bers who would pay close at­ten­tion. Ad­di­tion­al­ly, Dwari­ka said, some peo­ple may not have the vig­i­lance to look out for some­one else’s child, know the signs of dis­tress, or might be pre­oc­cu­pied. He said some peo­ple on­ly re­alised how quick­ly wa­ter be­came dan­ger­ous af­ter ex­pe­ri­enc­ing an in­ci­dent.

There­fore, Dwari­ka said par­ents should do noth­ing else but mon­i­tor chil­dren, whether at wa­ter parks or pub­lic or home pools. He al­so said it was safer to look over­head rather than be­ing in the wa­ter with them.

“If a par­ent is su­per­vis­ing their chil­dren bathing, they should not be in the wa­ter. And sec­ond­ly, if they even have to leave to get a bot­tle of wa­ter from a cool­er, the chil­dren should come out of the wa­ter.”

Dwari­ka said there was a prac­tice that even if a life­guard had to go on a bath­room break, every­one had to come out of the wa­ter, or some­one take over the watch be­cause they did not want to lose su­per­vi­sion. He said some peo­ple would see it as a bit rigid, but it is im­por­tant to save lives.

Guardian Me­dia at­tempt­ed to con­tact OS­HA per­son­nel for com­ment on reg­u­la­tions re­gard­ing the op­er­a­tion of wa­ter parks yes­ter­day but was un­suc­cess­ful. A search of the OSH Act al­so did not re­veal spe­cif­ic reg­u­la­tions for wa­ter park and pool op­er­a­tions.

Al­so con­tact­ed, the TTPS’ Child Pro­tec­tion Unit and San Fer­nan­do po­lice said they were in­ves­ti­gat­ing the drown­ing. While in­ves­ti­ga­tors be­lieve the death was ac­ci­den­tal, they said they were con­tin­u­ing in­quiries to un­earth the cir­cum­stances sur­round­ing it and were await­ing an au­top­sy re­port.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored