JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, April 17, 2025

Judge orders police to return cash to San Juan businessman after seizure

by

708 days ago
20230509
HALL OF JUSTICE

HALL OF JUSTICE

Roberto Codallo

Derek Achong

Cash seized by the po­lice pur­suant to crim­i­nal in­ves­ti­ga­tions must be re­turned to their own­ers in the cur­ren­cies they were tak­en.

High Court Judge Eleanor Don­ald­son-Hon­ey­well gave the ad­vice last week as she up­held a law­suit from busi­ness­man Prim­nath Gee­lal, of Su­per Whole­salers and Dis­trib­u­tors Lim­it­ed. 

Ac­cord­ing to the ev­i­dence in the case, on Ju­ly 31, 2015, a group of po­lice of­fi­cers en­tered his busi­ness, lo­cat­ed along El So­cor­ro Road in San Juan, un­der a search war­rant for il­le­gal firearms and am­mu­ni­tion. 

Al­though the of­fi­cers did not find any il­le­gal weapons and Gee­lal was not charged, they still seized a large quan­ti­ty of cash, which was found in 20 dif­fer­ent cur­ren­cies. 

The po­lice of­fi­cers ob­tained or­ders un­der the Pro­ceeds of Crime Act (POCA) for the cash to re­main de­tained pend­ing fur­ther in­ves­ti­ga­tions. 

When the or­ders ex­pired in Au­gust 2017, the T&T Po­lice Ser­vice (TTPS) sought to re­turn some of the cash in T&T dol­lars in the form of a cheque from the Cen­tral Bank in the sum of $1,059,256.13.  

Gee­lal re­fused and his at­tor­neys, led by Se­nior Coun­sel Anand Ram­lo­gan, of Free­dom Law Cham­bers, filed the law­suit that was even­tu­al­ly de­ter­mined by Jus­tice Don­ald­son-Hon­ey­well, last week. He al­so re­fused to ac­cept some of the cash that was kept in its orig­i­nal form at the Fraud Squad of­fice. 

In its de­fence, the Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al sub­mit­ted that the POCA did not ex­press­ly state how seized for­eign cur­ren­cy should be de­posit­ed un­der a court or­der ex­cept to say it should be in an in­ter­est-bear­ing ac­count. 

It con­tend­ed that based on the gen­er­al word­ing, the Comp­trol­ler of Ac­counts is en­ti­tled to se­lect a method that is rea­son­able and prac­ti­ca­ble and which con­forms with its own process­es and pro­ce­dures. 

In de­ter­min­ing the case, Jus­tice Don­ald­son-Hon­ey­well ruled that the cash should have been re­turned in the cur­ren­cy seized. 

“When cash is not for­feit­ed but in­stead re­leased or re­turned, it is im­plic­it that in­ves­ti­ga­tions did not re­veal that the cash is soiled or taint­ed. Con­se­quent­ly, the cit­i­zen re­sumes the en­joy­ment of the prop­er­ty,” she said. 

“As such, the cash must be re­leased in the cur­ren­cies which were seized. Any­thing less will de­prive the cit­i­zen of the en­joy­ment of their prop­er­ty,” she added. 

She al­so ruled that he was en­ti­tled to $50,000 in com­pen­sa­tion for the det­inue and con­ver­sion over how Gee­lal’s prop­er­ty was han­dled. 

As part of her judg­ment, Jus­tice Don­ald­son-Hon­ey­well or­dered that Gee­lal’s cash be re­turned in the orig­i­nal cur­ren­cies that were con­vert­ed plus 7.5 per­cent in­ter­est be­tween 2015 and last week. 

The State was al­so or­dered to pay Gee­lal’s le­gal costs for the case.

Gee­lal was al­so rep­re­sent­ed by Ganesh Sa­roop, and Shel­don Sookram, while Niquelle Nel­son-Granville and Lau­ra Per­sad rep­re­sent­ed the AG’s Of­fice. 


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored