The United National Congress has placed Rural Development and Local Government Minister and former attorney general Faris Al-Rawi in the firing line following the collapse of the alleged legal fee kickback case involving former AG Anand Ramlogan and former UNC senator Gerald Ramdeen.
On Monday, Director of Public Prosecutions Roger Gaspard discontinued corruption charges after the State’s main witness, Nelson Vincent, opted not to testify before a civil matter involving the indemnity agreement he had entered into with the former AG was settled.
At a press conference at the Opposition’s office in Port-of-Spain on Tuesday, UNC leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar said she had documents in her possession to show Nelson was suing the State for $150 million.
“He is claiming over $150 million TT dollars. This money is not of the AG or the State, but of the taxpayers of Trinidad and Tobago. It would appear that his claim is based on the breach of the pernicious indemnity agreement that Al-Rawi secretly entered into with Mr Nelson.”
The civil lawsuit is what triggered the collapse of the Ramdeen and Ramlogan case.
While the legitimacy of the document is yet to be corroborated, Persad-Bissessar questioned whether Al-Rawi acted alone when he signed off on the indemnity agreement and whether he breached the Constitution’s separation of powers.
She said it appeared Al-Rawi may have crossed the line as a member of the Government and must now face the consequences.
She said, “That indemnity agreement purports to grant to the State witness, Mr Nelson, witness in criminal proceedings but he is also a defendant. That agreement was to pay his fine and the other inducements included in the said indemnity and this could hardly be authorised by a sole minister on his own. That is why I asked yesterday:
1. Did the Cabinet know and authorise this indemnity agreement?
2. Did the PM know and authorise this indemnity agreement?
3. Or did the AG take up himself on a frolic of his own and went off to sign a damaging document?
“What it does is it indemnifies this state witness, also defendant, from having to pay fines or damages and being sued in any court of law. From taxes. This is madness that an AG can sign it over. He doesn’t have this power, it lies only with the DPP. It is foolhardy to believe that such an important document did not have sight and approval of the Cabinet or at least the head of Government, the PM, before it was executed.”
She said Al-Rawi was blinded by what she described as his personal desire to get the forger AG and former UNC senator at any cost and must now face the consequences for his action.
“Today, I demand Al-Rawi’s immediate resignation from the Cabinet. A State witness has filed a claim against him which raises serious issues of misbehaviour in public office, witness tampering and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. It is untenable and unacceptable for him to sit in the cabinet with such serious issues swirling over his head.”
Persad-Bissessar also alleged that a lawyer (name called) pocketed over TT$6 million from the legal fee kickback case. She questioned if that was an appropriate fee for a junior attorney. She said claimed the lawyer (name withheld) is known to be a personal friend of Al-Rawi, and now has benefited significantly from State briefs.
“This was a vulgar abuse of public funds and I call upon the Criminal Bar to indicate whether it was appropriate for Government to pay the legal fees for a defendant who was being prosecuted by the State.”
Persad-Bissessar maintained that the indemnity agreement and subsequent legal fees under the former AG’s watch was a cause for concern and that Al Rawi’s action was tantamount to misbehaviour in office.
Meanwhile, in a statement on Tuesday, Al-Rawi rejected Persad-Bissessar’s allegations and said the issues raised will be addressed at a press conference today.