JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, April 6, 2025

Kamla: Nelson suing State for $150M

by

907 days ago
20221011

The Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress has placed Rur­al De­vel­op­ment and Lo­cal Gov­ern­ment Min­is­ter and for­mer at­tor­ney gen­er­al Faris Al-Rawi in the fir­ing line fol­low­ing the col­lapse of the al­leged le­gal fee kick­back case in­volv­ing for­mer AG Anand Ram­lo­gan and for­mer UNC sen­a­tor Ger­ald Ramdeen.

On Mon­day, Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions Roger Gas­pard dis­con­tin­ued cor­rup­tion charges af­ter the State’s main wit­ness, Nel­son Vin­cent, opt­ed not to tes­ti­fy be­fore a civ­il mat­ter in­volv­ing the in­dem­ni­ty agree­ment he had en­tered in­to with the for­mer AG was set­tled.

At a press con­fer­ence at the Op­po­si­tion’s of­fice in Port-of-Spain on Tues­day, UNC leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar said she had doc­u­ments in her pos­ses­sion to show Nel­son was su­ing the State for $150 mil­lion.

“He is claim­ing over $150 mil­lion TT dol­lars. This mon­ey is not of the AG or the State, but of the tax­pay­ers of Trinidad and To­ba­go. It would ap­pear that his claim is based on the breach of the per­ni­cious in­dem­ni­ty agree­ment that Al-Rawi se­cret­ly en­tered in­to with Mr Nel­son.”

The civ­il law­suit is what trig­gered the col­lapse of the Ramdeen and Ram­lo­gan case.

While the le­git­i­ma­cy of the doc­u­ment is yet to be cor­rob­o­rat­ed, Per­sad-Bisses­sar ques­tioned whether Al-Rawi act­ed alone when he signed off on the in­dem­ni­ty agree­ment and whether he breached the Con­sti­tu­tion’s sep­a­ra­tion of pow­ers.

She said it ap­peared Al-Rawi may have crossed the line as a mem­ber of the Gov­ern­ment and must now face the con­se­quences.

She said, “That in­dem­ni­ty agree­ment pur­ports to grant to the State wit­ness, Mr Nel­son, wit­ness in crim­i­nal pro­ceed­ings but he is al­so a de­fen­dant. That agree­ment was to pay his fine and the oth­er in­duce­ments in­clud­ed in the said in­dem­ni­ty and this could hard­ly be au­tho­rised by a sole min­is­ter on his own. That is why I asked yes­ter­day:

1. Did the Cab­i­net know and au­tho­rise this in­dem­ni­ty agree­ment?

2. Did the PM know and au­tho­rise this in­dem­ni­ty agree­ment?

3. Or did the AG take up him­self on a frol­ic of his own and went off to sign a dam­ag­ing doc­u­ment?

“What it does is it in­dem­ni­fies this state wit­ness, al­so de­fen­dant, from hav­ing to pay fines or dam­ages and be­ing sued in any court of law. From tax­es. This is mad­ness that an AG can sign it over. He doesn’t have this pow­er, it lies on­ly with the DPP. It is fool­hardy to be­lieve that such an im­por­tant doc­u­ment did not have sight and ap­proval of the Cab­i­net or at least the head of Gov­ern­ment, the PM, be­fore it was ex­e­cut­ed.”

She said Al-Rawi was blind­ed by what she de­scribed as his per­son­al de­sire to get the forg­er AG and for­mer UNC sen­a­tor at any cost and must now face the con­se­quences for his ac­tion.

“To­day, I de­mand Al-Rawi’s im­me­di­ate res­ig­na­tion from the Cab­i­net. A State wit­ness has filed a claim against him which rais­es se­ri­ous is­sues of mis­be­hav­iour in pub­lic of­fice, wit­ness tam­per­ing and con­spir­a­cy to per­vert the course of jus­tice. It is un­ten­able and un­ac­cept­able for him to sit in the cab­i­net with such se­ri­ous is­sues swirling over his head.”

Per­sad-Bisses­sar al­so al­leged that a lawyer (name called) pock­et­ed over TT$6 mil­lion from the le­gal fee kick­back case. She ques­tioned if that was an ap­pro­pri­ate fee for a ju­nior at­tor­ney. She said claimed the lawyer (name with­held) is known to be a per­son­al friend of Al-Rawi, and now has ben­e­fit­ed sig­nif­i­cant­ly from State briefs.

“This was a vul­gar abuse of pub­lic funds and I call up­on the Crim­i­nal Bar to in­di­cate whether it was ap­pro­pri­ate for Gov­ern­ment to pay the le­gal fees for a de­fen­dant who was be­ing pros­e­cut­ed by the State.”

Per­sad-Bisses­sar main­tained that the in­dem­ni­ty agree­ment and sub­se­quent le­gal fees un­der the for­mer AG’s watch was a cause for con­cern and that Al Rawi’s ac­tion was tan­ta­mount to mis­be­hav­iour in of­fice.

Mean­while, in a state­ment on Tues­day, Al-Rawi re­ject­ed Per­sad-Bisses­sar’s al­le­ga­tions and said the is­sues raised will be ad­dressed at a press con­fer­ence to­day.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored