JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, April 7, 2025

Mixed views over Kamla’s refusal to speak on ‘Marlene-gate’

by

Chester Sambrano
2026 days ago
20190920

Two at­tor­neys and a po­lit­i­cal an­a­lyst have ex­pressed mixed views over Op­po­si­tion Leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar’s de­ci­sion not to speak on the al­le­ga­tions that she alert­ed Mar­lene Mc­Don­ald to the fact that she would have been ar­rest­ed by po­lice.

Per­sad-Bisses­sar told a UNC po­lit­i­cal meet­ing on Wednes­day that the mat­ter was sub ju­dice, as her rea­son for not want­i­ng to speak fur­ther on the mat­ter.

At­tor­ney Mar­tin George, how­ev­er, did not agree with Per­sad-Bisses­sar’s stance.

“If it is that there has been an an­cil­lary mat­ter raised in re­la­tion to the ques­tion of the leak­ing of in­for­ma­tion and per­sons be­ing ei­ther tipped-off or no­ti­fied be­fore­hand, to the best of our knowl­edge as to what is al­ready in the pub­lic do­main there doesn’t ap­pear to be any le­gal mat­ter in the courts or be­fore the crim­i­nal courts in re­la­tion to that, so, one is at pains to un­der­stand how that could be con­sid­ered as sub ju­dice,” George told Guardian Me­dia.

Mean­while at­tor­ney Fa­reed Ali, ex­pressed a dif­fer­ent view.

“It is cor­rect of her in law to sit un­der the um­brel­la or the pro­tec­tive cov­er­ing of sub ju­dice and in­di­cate that I am not com­ment­ing on the ba­sis that it is sub ju­dice be­fore the courts. I think she has found, us­ing her le­gal knowl­edge, a skil­ful way of avoid­ing hav­ing to name her source,” Ali said.

He added it will be in her best po­lit­i­cal in­ter­est not to talk on the mat­ter.

But giv­en the pol­i­tics of the mat­ter, an­a­lyst Dr Win­ford James told Guardian Me­dia the sub ju­dice claim does not work in the favour of the Op­po­si­tion Leader.

“The Op­po­si­tion Leader wants to de­vel­op a sense of mys­tery about the is­sue but the is­sue is straight­for­ward, some­body must have told her and the ques­tion is who told her? Hid­ing un­der sub ju­dice doesn’t re­al­ly help her po­si­tion. Come out and say who told you, but no politi­cian would do that,” James said.

Since the is­sue was made pub­lic, Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice Gary Grif­fith ad­dressed the mat­ter by say­ing “it is ab­solute­ly im­pos­si­ble that any­one could have made such a state­ment and be ac­cu­rate about it be­cause sev­er­al weeks be­fore there was noth­ing re­mote­ly close to go­ing ahead to con­firm any MP was to be ar­rest­ed.”

Mc­Don­ald told Guardian Me­dia she had “no doubt” in her mind that the Op­po­si­tion Leader was speak­ing the truth and she had no rea­son to doubt her.

On Au­gust 7, an of­fi­cer of the Fraud Squad swooped down on Mc­Don­ald’s St Joseph home and ex­e­cut­ed a search war­rant.

Days lat­er Mc­Don­ald, her long-time com­pan­ion Michael Carew and three oth­ers were slapped with 49 fraud and cor­rup­tion charges.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored