JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, May 25, 2025

The contrasting leadership styles of Rowley and Manning

Both re­built the PNM af­ter elec­tion de­feats (run over head­line)

by

20 days ago
20250505

SHAL­IZA HAS­SANALI

Se­nior In­ves­tiga­tive Re­porter

shal­iza.has­sanali@guardian.co.tt

Patrick Man­ning and Dr Kei­th Row­ley, two Peo­ple’s Na­tion­al Move­ment prime min­is­ters, were not cut from the same cloth. Their fun­da­men­tal be­liefs, lead­er­ship styles, ideas, poli­cies, gov­er­nance and in­ter­ac­tions with peo­ple were very dif­fer­ent.

They have been de­scribed as chalk and cheese by peo­ple who knew and in­ter­act­ed with them.

While Man­ning car­ried him­self like a states­man, Row­ley tend­ed to be tougher and more di­rect in han­dling the coun­try’s af­fairs.

Guardian Me­dia spoke to in­di­vid­u­als who in­ter­act­ed with both lead­ers to gauge their com­par­isons and sought the opin­ions of po­lit­i­cal an­a­lysts about their per­son­al­i­ties, per­for­mance and prime min­is­ter­ship.

“Man­ning was a vi­sion­ary. He did not ab­di­cate re­spon­si­bil­i­ty. When he gave you some­thing to do, he gave you breath­ing space,” said for­mer PNM vice chair­man Robert Le Hunte, who sat on sev­er­al state boards dur­ing Man­ning’s tenure, de­scribed him as some­one with lead­er­ship qual­i­ties.

Hav­ing served as pub­lic util­i­ties min­is­ter in Row­ley’s ad­min­is­tra­tion, Le Hunte said his lead­er­ship ap­proach was dif­fer­ent.

Row­ley did not fa­cil­i­tate many one-on-one con­ver­sa­tions, he said.

“And there­fore, the abil­i­ty to work di­rect­ly with him in get­ting di­rect guid­ance… it wasn’t there. He was not a per­son who would be call­ing up­on you to find out what’s go­ing on and to bounce ideas off. He was not a per­son to mi­cro­man­age.”

Le Hunte said Row­ley had im­mense con­fi­dence in Stu­art Young, whom he called his Gary Sobers and re­lied heav­i­ly on him.

“So a lot of how you dealt with Dr Row­ley, you al­most had very... at all points in time, you al­ways had to work through Stu­art Young.”

“If you’re a mem­ber of a team, no mat­ter how great you are, if you’re not get­ting play­time, you will nev­er be able to shine. Cab­i­net to me re­quires team­work. One per­son can­not car­ry a team on their back. When you are on­ly re­ly­ing on one per­son or a few peo­ple, then it leads to dis­tor­tion and it doesn’t lead to prop­er team­work,” he said.

For­mer Port-of-Spain may­or Louis Lee Sing said Man­ning was a far su­pe­ri­or leader to Row­ley. He viewed them on op­po­site ends of the scale.

“Man­ning cer­tain­ly il­lus­trat­ed he had a ca­pac­i­ty to think and to lead. Peo­ple will­ing­ly fol­lowed him. No­body was scared of him. Peo­ple dealt with Man­ning one-on-one.”

Most im­por­tant­ly, Lee Sing said, he al­ways had a lis­ten­ing ear, “took ad­vice from peo­ple and al­so gave ad­vice.”

Lee Sing, a found­ing mem­ber of the PNM, re­signed from the par­ty in 2015.

He said fol­low­ing Mon­day’s crush­ing elec­tion de­feat, the par­ty may have re­gret­ted se­lect­ing Row­ley as leader in 2010.

He ex­pect­ed par­ty sup­port­ers to chase Row­ley out of Bal­isi­er House when the gen­er­al coun­cil met on Wednes­day to se­lect Pen­ne­lope Beck­les-Robin­son as Op­po­si­tion Leader.

In 2010, Man­ning was hound­ed out of Bal­isi­er House by an­gry sup­port­ers af­ter los­ing the elec­tion to the Peo­ple’s Part­ner­ship.

Man­ning served as prime min­is­ter from 1991 to 1995 and 2001 to 2010.

Lee Sing said dur­ing Row­ley’s ten years as prime min­is­ter, Lee Sing said his brash and un­apolo­getic style did not au­gur well for him and his par­ty.

Known for not minc­ing his words, Row­ley came un­der fire for telling women to choose their men wise­ly.

Dur­ing the pan­dem­ic, he told the coun­try “From mid­night tonight, don’t jack­ass the thing.”

Lee Sing be­lieves such re­marks made Row­ley lose points.

“These things kill him. Those things il­lus­trat­ed to me his un­wor­thi­ness to hold the of­fice of Prime Min­is­ter,” he said.

“Dr Row­ley had the pos­si­bil­i­ty to be a trans­for­ma­tion­al leader but lead­ing is not an easy as­sign­ment, par­tic­u­lar­ly when you’re lead­ing and you have built up a team of peo­ple and sur­round­ed your­self by peo­ple who de­mand noth­ing of you.”

“The par­ty was bro­ken un­der him. His choice was a man who had no po­lit­i­cal savvy, a man who had no po­lit­i­cal his­to­ry,” he added, re­fer­ring to Stu­art Young, who was cho­sen as Row­ley’s suc­ces­sor.

“Where the PNM is at to­day is far worse than where Man­ning left it.”

Lee Sing said Row­ley “lived light and weighed heavy.”

For­mer PNM’s deputy po­lit­i­cal leader Nafeesa Mo­hammed said Man­ning was a true “states­man and diplo­mat” with bril­liant ideas, goals and ob­jec­tives for the coun­try.

One thing that stood out for her was Man­ning’s abil­i­ty to keep the Caribbean unit­ed.

“He helped to keep the peace in the re­gion when ten­sion was re­al­ly high,” she said.

How­ev­er, Mo­hammed saw a change in Man­ning lead­ing up to the 2010 gen­er­al elec­tion.

He con­vened few­er lead­er­ship meet­ings, “had his head in the clouds and did not want to be ques­tioned,” she re­called.

“He start­ed to be­come dis­con­nect­ed to the ground and from the par­ty.”

Around that time, doc­u­ments sur­faced al­leged­ly that an $820 mil­lion con­tact­ed had been award­ed to the wife of Ur­ban De­vel­op­ment Cor­po­ra­tion of T&T (Ude­cott) ex­ec­u­tive di­rec­tor, Calder Hart.

Man­ning al­so ad­mit­ted that State lands were grant­ed to con­struct a church in the Heights of Gua­napo, man­aged by Rev­erend Ju­liana Pe­na, his spir­i­tu­al ad­vis­er.

Mo­hammed said Row­ley, on the oth­er hand, was rough and did not have con­sis­tent meet­ings.

“Even though Man­ning be­came out of touch, he was still ap­proach­able. He was a gen­tle­man. He was very civ­il,” she said.

Mo­hammed was fired as Row­ley’s le­gal ad­vis­er in 2018 fol­low­ing a Face­book post where she took is­sue with the ar­rest of her rel­a­tive Tariq Mo­hammed.

She said there is a soft side to Row­ley that many peo­ple don’t know.

“I have seen that side in him,” she said.

For­mer PNM’s gen­er­al sec­re­tary Ash­ton Ford said the PNM fol­lows tra­di­tion be­cause of the par­ty’s con­sti­tu­tion and Man­ning and Row­ley were re­spon­si­ble for re­build­ing the PNM af­ter it suf­fered de­feats.

“Both had the same task but in Man­ning’s case, it was very dif­fi­cult,” he said.

Ford said Man­ning was tasked with re­build­ing the PNM af­ter its 33-3 de­feat to the Na­tion­al Al­liance for Re­con­struc­tion in 1986.

He point­ed out that Row­ley made his Cab­i­net di­verse “and they still ter­ror­is­ing us and say­ing that we are an African par­ty, which is non­sense.”

Po­lit­i­cal sci­en­tist Prof Hamid Ghany said Man­ning was able “to con­vey an im­age of dig­ni­fied diplo­ma­cy along­side an abil­i­ty to tack­le chal­lenges in the po­lit­i­cal gayelle with the req­ui­site force that was re­quired.”

On the oth­er hand, Row­ley did not ex­ude diplo­ma­cy “and was more com­fort­able func­tion­ing as if he were in the po­lit­i­cal gayelle most of the time.”

Po­lit­i­cal an­a­lyst Dr Bish­nu Ra­goonath said Row­ley had lim­it­ed suc­cess dur­ing his tenure com­pared to Man­ning and his neg­a­tives out­weighed his pos­i­tives.

“He bul­lied his way, not on­ly of his own par­ty but at­tempt­ed at many times to bul­ly the pop­u­la­tion in­to sim­ply ac­cept­ing things the way he saw it, with­out giv­ing peo­ple that op­por­tu­ni­ty,” he said, adding that Mon­day’s de­feat re­flect­ed that.

“He was not one who lis­tened to the peo­ple on the ground. He was sim­ply do­ing what he thought would have been in his best in­ter­est rather than in the best in­ter­est of the pop­u­la­tion,” Ra­goonath said

While Row­ley can be cred­it­ed for car­ing for the coun­try dur­ing the pan­dem­ic and sta­bil­is­ing the econ­o­my, “the econ­o­my is prob­a­bly at the same state as it was in 2015, when he came in­to of­fice.”

In ad­di­tion, the coun­try faced the high­est mur­der rate un­der his regime.

“He had to re­sort, in the end, to the State of Emer­gency to try to quell things down,” he said.

Ra­goonath said Row­ley had more go­ing against him with the clo­sure of the Petrotrin re­fin­ery, the dead Drag­on gas deal, poor roads and his ad­min­is­tra­tion’s fail­ure to di­ver­si­fy the econ­o­my.

The pop­u­la­tion could not di­gest the sig­nif­i­cant salary in­creas­es for par­lia­men­tar­i­ans as it demon­strat­ed that “all they were con­cerned about was their self-in­ter­est.”

Po­lit­i­cal sci­en­tist Dr Shane Mo­hammed said Row­ley was most de­spised be­cause of his lack of charis­ma.

“The pop­u­la­tion was al­ways to blame for all the ills of gov­er­nance. Is Row­ley an au­then­tic leader? Yes, he is but I will not cat­e­gorise his au­then­tic­i­ty as pos­i­tive, even in the con­text of what you see is what you get,” he said.

Mo­hammed said Row­ley’s ar­ro­gance and ad­ver­sar­i­al ap­proach to com­mu­ni­cat­ing with the pop­u­la­tion caused dis­con­tent in his gov­ern­ment.

“Peo­ple be­came frus­trat­ed.”

He said Man­ning demon­strat­ed charis­ma, charm and elo­quence.

“He un­der­stood that per­son­al griev­ances should not stymie the na­tion­al progress and de­vel­op­ment, as well as bi­par­ti­san­ship in Par­lia­ment and gov­er­nance.

“Man­ning took po­lit­i­cal risks and whilst it cost him the gov­ern­ment he was one of the con­trib­u­tors to col­lab­o­ra­tive lead­er­ship and po­lit­i­cal pi­cong but al­so mu­tu­al re­spect for peo­ple and col­leagues.”

Claim­ing that Man­ning far out­shone Row­ley, he added: “He un­der­stood what tru­ly re­build­ing a par­ty was all about.”

Even with el­e­ments of hubris be­tween 2007 and 2010, Man­ning paid a price, Mo­hammed said.

“In the years be­fore he was a gen­tle­man, con­nect­ed to the peo­ple, a man of all sea­sons and one who did not have ven­om for his po­lit­i­cal op­po­nents. He un­der­stood his role as prime min­is­ter, a politi­cian and a states­man.”

Man­ning died in 2016.

Some of Man­ning’s achieve­ments (Put in box)

*Built NA­PA, SAPA, UTT and the Wa­ter­front Project

*Es­tab­lished GATE, CEPEP and CDAP pro­grammes, as well as the Her­itage and Sta­bil­i­sa­tion Fund

*Con­cep­tu­alised Vi­sion 2020

*Re­boot­ed the en­er­gy sec­tor.

Some of Row­ley’s achieve­ments (Put in box)

*Han­dling the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic

*Restora­tion of the Red House and Mag­nif­i­cent Sev­en build­ings

*Con­struc­tion of the Point Fortin, Ari­ma, San­gre Grande and Cen­tral Block of the Port-of-Spain Gen­er­al Hos­pi­tal.

* Bring­ing the Bri­an Lara Crick­et Acad­e­my in­to use.

*Com­mis­sioned the To­ba­go Air­port.

*Tack­led the sea bridge fi­as­co

* Ex­pand­ed the road net­work.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored