SHALIZA HASSANALI
Senior Investigative Reporter
shaliza.hassanali@guardian.co.tt
Patrick Manning and Dr Keith Rowley, two People’s National Movement prime ministers, were not cut from the same cloth. Their fundamental beliefs, leadership styles, ideas, policies, governance and interactions with people were very different.
They have been described as chalk and cheese by people who knew and interacted with them.
While Manning carried himself like a statesman, Rowley tended to be tougher and more direct in handling the country’s affairs.
Guardian Media spoke to individuals who interacted with both leaders to gauge their comparisons and sought the opinions of political analysts about their personalities, performance and prime ministership.
“Manning was a visionary. He did not abdicate responsibility. When he gave you something to do, he gave you breathing space,” said former PNM vice chairman Robert Le Hunte, who sat on several state boards during Manning’s tenure, described him as someone with leadership qualities.
Having served as public utilities minister in Rowley’s administration, Le Hunte said his leadership approach was different.
Rowley did not facilitate many one-on-one conversations, he said.
“And therefore, the ability to work directly with him in getting direct guidance… it wasn’t there. He was not a person who would be calling upon you to find out what’s going on and to bounce ideas off. He was not a person to micromanage.”
Le Hunte said Rowley had immense confidence in Stuart Young, whom he called his Gary Sobers and relied heavily on him.
“So a lot of how you dealt with Dr Rowley, you almost had very... at all points in time, you always had to work through Stuart Young.”
“If you’re a member of a team, no matter how great you are, if you’re not getting playtime, you will never be able to shine. Cabinet to me requires teamwork. One person cannot carry a team on their back. When you are only relying on one person or a few people, then it leads to distortion and it doesn’t lead to proper teamwork,” he said.
Former Port-of-Spain mayor Louis Lee Sing said Manning was a far superior leader to Rowley. He viewed them on opposite ends of the scale.
“Manning certainly illustrated he had a capacity to think and to lead. People willingly followed him. Nobody was scared of him. People dealt with Manning one-on-one.”
Most importantly, Lee Sing said, he always had a listening ear, “took advice from people and also gave advice.”
Lee Sing, a founding member of the PNM, resigned from the party in 2015.
He said following Monday’s crushing election defeat, the party may have regretted selecting Rowley as leader in 2010.
He expected party supporters to chase Rowley out of Balisier House when the general council met on Wednesday to select Pennelope Beckles-Robinson as Opposition Leader.
In 2010, Manning was hounded out of Balisier House by angry supporters after losing the election to the People’s Partnership.
Manning served as prime minister from 1991 to 1995 and 2001 to 2010.
Lee Sing said during Rowley’s ten years as prime minister, Lee Sing said his brash and unapologetic style did not augur well for him and his party.
Known for not mincing his words, Rowley came under fire for telling women to choose their men wisely.
During the pandemic, he told the country “From midnight tonight, don’t jackass the thing.”
Lee Sing believes such remarks made Rowley lose points.
“These things kill him. Those things illustrated to me his unworthiness to hold the office of Prime Minister,” he said.
“Dr Rowley had the possibility to be a transformational leader but leading is not an easy assignment, particularly when you’re leading and you have built up a team of people and surrounded yourself by people who demand nothing of you.”
“The party was broken under him. His choice was a man who had no political savvy, a man who had no political history,” he added, referring to Stuart Young, who was chosen as Rowley’s successor.
“Where the PNM is at today is far worse than where Manning left it.”
Lee Sing said Rowley “lived light and weighed heavy.”
Former PNM’s deputy political leader Nafeesa Mohammed said Manning was a true “statesman and diplomat” with brilliant ideas, goals and objectives for the country.
One thing that stood out for her was Manning’s ability to keep the Caribbean united.
“He helped to keep the peace in the region when tension was really high,” she said.
However, Mohammed saw a change in Manning leading up to the 2010 general election.
He convened fewer leadership meetings, “had his head in the clouds and did not want to be questioned,” she recalled.
“He started to become disconnected to the ground and from the party.”
Around that time, documents surfaced allegedly that an $820 million contacted had been awarded to the wife of Urban Development Corporation of T&T (Udecott) executive director, Calder Hart.
Manning also admitted that State lands were granted to construct a church in the Heights of Guanapo, managed by Reverend Juliana Pena, his spiritual adviser.
Mohammed said Rowley, on the other hand, was rough and did not have consistent meetings.
“Even though Manning became out of touch, he was still approachable. He was a gentleman. He was very civil,” she said.
Mohammed was fired as Rowley’s legal adviser in 2018 following a Facebook post where she took issue with the arrest of her relative Tariq Mohammed.
She said there is a soft side to Rowley that many people don’t know.
“I have seen that side in him,” she said.
Former PNM’s general secretary Ashton Ford said the PNM follows tradition because of the party’s constitution and Manning and Rowley were responsible for rebuilding the PNM after it suffered defeats.
“Both had the same task but in Manning’s case, it was very difficult,” he said.
Ford said Manning was tasked with rebuilding the PNM after its 33-3 defeat to the National Alliance for Reconstruction in 1986.
He pointed out that Rowley made his Cabinet diverse “and they still terrorising us and saying that we are an African party, which is nonsense.”
Political scientist Prof Hamid Ghany said Manning was able “to convey an image of dignified diplomacy alongside an ability to tackle challenges in the political gayelle with the requisite force that was required.”
On the other hand, Rowley did not exude diplomacy “and was more comfortable functioning as if he were in the political gayelle most of the time.”
Political analyst Dr Bishnu Ragoonath said Rowley had limited success during his tenure compared to Manning and his negatives outweighed his positives.
“He bullied his way, not only of his own party but attempted at many times to bully the population into simply accepting things the way he saw it, without giving people that opportunity,” he said, adding that Monday’s defeat reflected that.
“He was not one who listened to the people on the ground. He was simply doing what he thought would have been in his best interest rather than in the best interest of the population,” Ragoonath said
While Rowley can be credited for caring for the country during the pandemic and stabilising the economy, “the economy is probably at the same state as it was in 2015, when he came into office.”
In addition, the country faced the highest murder rate under his regime.
“He had to resort, in the end, to the State of Emergency to try to quell things down,” he said.
Ragoonath said Rowley had more going against him with the closure of the Petrotrin refinery, the dead Dragon gas deal, poor roads and his administration’s failure to diversify the economy.
The population could not digest the significant salary increases for parliamentarians as it demonstrated that “all they were concerned about was their self-interest.”
Political scientist Dr Shane Mohammed said Rowley was most despised because of his lack of charisma.
“The population was always to blame for all the ills of governance. Is Rowley an authentic leader? Yes, he is but I will not categorise his authenticity as positive, even in the context of what you see is what you get,” he said.
Mohammed said Rowley’s arrogance and adversarial approach to communicating with the population caused discontent in his government.
“People became frustrated.”
He said Manning demonstrated charisma, charm and eloquence.
“He understood that personal grievances should not stymie the national progress and development, as well as bipartisanship in Parliament and governance.
“Manning took political risks and whilst it cost him the government he was one of the contributors to collaborative leadership and political picong but also mutual respect for people and colleagues.”
Claiming that Manning far outshone Rowley, he added: “He understood what truly rebuilding a party was all about.”
Even with elements of hubris between 2007 and 2010, Manning paid a price, Mohammed said.
“In the years before he was a gentleman, connected to the people, a man of all seasons and one who did not have venom for his political opponents. He understood his role as prime minister, a politician and a statesman.”
Manning died in 2016.
Some of Manning’s achievements (Put in box)
*Built NAPA, SAPA, UTT and the Waterfront Project
*Established GATE, CEPEP and CDAP programmes, as well as the Heritage and Stabilisation Fund
*Conceptualised Vision 2020
*Rebooted the energy sector.
Some of Rowley’s achievements (Put in box)
*Handling the COVID-19 pandemic
*Restoration of the Red House and Magnificent Seven buildings
*Construction of the Point Fortin, Arima, Sangre Grande and Central Block of the Port-of-Spain General Hospital.
* Bringing the Brian Lara Cricket Academy into use.
*Commissioned the Tobago Airport.
*Tackled the sea bridge fiasco
* Expanded the road network.