JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, March 17, 2025

TTPS owes $154 M for vehicle repairs, parts, services

Garages stop work, some close down, send home work­ers

by

1556 days ago
20201212

AN­NA-LISA-PAUL and

SHAL­IZA HAS­SANALI

The T&T Po­lice Ser­vice (TTPS) is ow­ing more than $40 mil­lion to sev­er­al garages and au­to re­pair shops across the coun­try for work done on po­lice ve­hi­cles. The out­stand­ing debt has forced more than 20 garages and re­pair shops to close their doors over the last six weeks while oth­ers have been send­ing home work­ers

The ac­tion tak­en by these garages has left hun­dreds of po­lice ve­hi­cles in­op­er­a­ble as they lie idle at po­lice sta­tions and re­pair yards na­tion­wide.

Busi­ness­man In­shan Ish­mael, who owns one of the garages af­fect­ed by the non-pay­ment of mon­ey for re­pairs to TTP’s ve­hi­cles, said apart from the $40 mil­lion “the TTPS is al­ready ow­ing over $100 mil­lion for goods and ser­vices” pro­vid­ed. He said this fig­ure in­clud­ed parts for the new­er mod­el of ve­hi­cles owned by the po­lice ser­vice.

The Ve­hi­cle Man­age­ment Cor­po­ra­tion of T&T (VM­COTT), es­tab­lished in 2000 to re­pair and ser­vice state-owned pri­vate and com­mer­cial ve­hi­cles, is still owed $14 mil­lion for re­pairs done to po­lice ve­hi­cles over the last eight years.

TTPS al­to­geth­er owes $154 mil­lion for ve­hi­cle re­pairs, parts, and ser­vices.

Mean­while, the crim­i­nal el­e­ments are al­ready cap­i­tal­is­ing on this short­fall of po­lice re­sources while busi­ness own­ers and home­own­ers are left in the lurch wait­ing for po­lice to ar­rive hours af­ter a crime and when they do, it is some­times on foot.

The CEO of VM­COTT Natasha Prince re­called that in May 2019 they had been owed $18 mil­lion. How­ev­er, a rec­on­cil­i­a­tion of the TTPS ac­count showed a pay­ment of $4 mil­lion had been made in 2012. Since then, no fur­ther pay­ments have been made to VM­COTT. Prince said al­though they have not been giv­en any busi­ness by the TTPS over the last year, they are still be­ing owed $14 mil­lion.

When Prince made those claims in May 2019, Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice Gary Grif­fith shot back in­sist­ing that VM­COTT would not be paid un­til the in­voic­es are pro­vid­ed for the work done. Prince said last week that VM­COTT sup­plied the TTPS with in­voic­es in Feb­ru­ary of this year, but was not giv­en any as­sur­ance of when they would be paid.

Al­though there are claims in the pub­lic that at least 50 to 60 per cent of the po­lice ve­hi­cle are down, there is no de­fin­i­tive fig­ure to re­flect how many ve­hi­cles are not func­tion­ing at this time. How­ev­er, last year Grif­fith re­vealed that a stag­ger­ing 500 ve­hi­cles had been tak­en out of ser­vice be­tween 2016-2018. He stat­ed that at least one-fifth of the po­lice ve­hi­cles were down for re­pairs. Grif­fith at­trib­uted this to an in­ef­fi­cient main­te­nance sys­tem and ad­mit­ted the ab­sence of those ve­hi­cles had ad­verse­ly im­pact­ed the TTPS’s crime-fight­ing abil­i­ties.

Grif­fith de­scribed the pre­ven­ta­tive main­te­nance sys­tem as flawed and said up un­til the mid­dle of 2018, a po­lice ve­hi­cle was be­ing writ­ten off and tak­en out of ser­vice at least every three to four days. He said in many cas­es back then, those re­spon­si­ble for man­ag­ing the fleet would wait un­til the ve­hi­cle was crit­i­cal­ly dam­aged or worn out be­fore send­ing it for re­pairs. In the face of these short­com­ings, an au­dit of the TTPS’s fleet was or­dered last year to as­sess the sta­tus of each ve­hi­cle.

‘Sup­pli­ers spent mil­lions to stock items’

Ish­mael, who con­firmed to the Sun­day Guardian that his busi­ness was one of those af­fect­ed by the TTPS’s in­abil­i­ty to pay for the re­pair of their ve­hi­cles, said the af­fect­ed busi­ness­es in­clud­ed those spe­cial­is­ing in bat­tery sup­plies, air-con­di­tion­ing re­pairs, tyre re­place­ment, align­ment ser­vices, me­chan­i­cal main­te­nance, body re­pair and paint­ing.

“My com­pa­ny ser­viced be­tween 50 to 60 ve­hi­cles per week, but about one month ago a de­ci­sion was tak­en by garages to hold off on pro­vid­ing ser­vices to the TTPS alone,” said Ish­mael.

He said some sup­pli­ers had al­ready spent mil­lions to stock items while he in­stalled two new lifts in an­tic­i­pa­tion of con­tin­ued busi­ness from the TTPS.

Ish­mael de­nied that sup­pli­ers had been seek­ing prof­it off the TTPS. “What we charge the TTPS is what we charge oth­er peo­ple. Five to ten per cent of the work we do for the po­lice is free be­cause this is how we give back.

Al­though the TTPS has out­stand­ing debts stretch­ing more than three years, Ish­mael said they “con­tin­ued do­ing the work and the TTPS un­der­stood this at the end of the day.” Ish­mael claimed that with the TTPS sev­er­ing ties with VM­COTT al­most a year ago, they did not have any­where else to get their ve­hi­cles re­paired. But the sit­u­a­tion has now be­come un­ten­able for the pri­vate garages.

Min­istry of Fi­nance not pay­ing

Ish­mael said the Min­istry of Fi­nance was ow­ing sup­pli­ers the out­stand­ing monies.

In re­sponse to an email from Ish­mael on No­vem­ber 4, Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert gave the as­sur­ance that a re­quest for funds had been made and it was be­ing processed.

In a fol­low-up email to Im­bert on No­vem­ber 16, that al­so in­clud­ed Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley and Grif­fith, Ish­mael again out­lined the con­cerns raised by garage own­ers and said more than 200 em­ploy­ees had been laid off from these af­fect­ed busi­ness­es. He said some own­ers and op­er­a­tors were un­able to pay salaries to their staff as there was lit­tle or no rev­enue be­ing gen­er­at­ed.

How­ev­er, a month has gone, and Ish­mael said they have not re­ceived any mon­ey. To en­sure that garages do not con­tin­ue to haem­or­rhage from these loss­es, Ish­mael said: “The garages would have no choice but to lit­i­gate at the end of the day to get what is owed to us.”

He said garage own­ers are con­tem­plat­ing a silent protest in front of the Min­istry of Fi­nance if some form of pay­ment is not made soon. Ish­mael said af­fect­ed garage own­ers could re­sume work if a “50-60 per cent good-faith pay­ment is made.”

The TTPS re­ceived $2.28 bil­lion in the 2020/2021 bud­get al­lo­ca­tion.

Run­away crime

Ish­mael said po­lice-op­er­at­ed ve­hi­cles need­ed to be ser­viced reg­u­lar­ly be­cause of its con­tin­u­ous use.

Ish­mael said: “With 50-60 per cent of the fleet down due to failed en­gines, they are now putting the bal­ance of ve­hi­cles and those us­ing them at risk, as it is over the stip­u­lat­ed ser­vice and re­pair pe­ri­od.”

In a shock­ing de­vel­op­ment, Ish­mael said so­cial me­dia users re­port­ed last month that po­lice of­fi­cers were host­ing a fund-rais­ing BBQ to gen­er­ate funds “to change oil and buy tyres for a po­lice car.” He al­so de­scribed an in­ci­dent in which po­lice of­fi­cers came to a vic­tim’s house in San­ta Cruz on foot fol­low­ing a rob­bery, since they did not have any ve­hi­cles at the po­lice sta­tion.

He said the biggest con­cern now was run­away crime.

“The blood of our women and chil­dren are ac­tu­al­ly fer­til­is­ing the soil of this coun­try . . . and you telling me the most im­por­tant thing is to look af­ter our po­lice ser­vice but in­stead, you are study­ing the San Fer­nan­do Wharf, the To­ba­go Air­port and to re­build the whole of Port-of-Spain and the TTPS don’t have mon­ey to keep run­ning and our women and chil­dren are be­ing killed?”

He warned that the “TTPS could fall flat” as they do not have the prop­er tools. He said if they fail to main­tain the ve­hi­cles prompt­ly, it could lead to hefty re­pair bills lat­er.

VM­COTT: TTPS debt still stands

Al­most eight years af­ter re­ceiv­ing a mere $4 mil­lion pay­out from an $18 mil­lion debt, VM­COTT’s CEO said she was un­sure when the re­main­der will be set­tled. But Prince re­mains op­ti­mistic.

“I know when they get their funds they will take care of VM­COTT,” she said

Prince said in 2018 VM­COTT re­fur­bished 55 Nis­san X-Trail ve­hi­cles for the TTPS and in 2019 they pro­vid­ed pre­ven­ta­tive main­te­nance and re­paired ap­prox­i­mate­ly 80 Nis­san X-Trails. How­ev­er, they have not re­paired or ser­viced any ve­hi­cles for the TTPS this year. Prince said she had writ­ten to the Gov­ern­ment about the lack of busi­ness as they have been the bonafide com­pa­ny to ser­vice the X-Trails in the past.

She be­lieves the $14 mil­lion debt is what prompt­ed the TTPS to take their busi­ness else­where.

The loss of busi­ness from the TTPS has se­vere­ly im­pact­ed VM­COTT’s op­er­a­tions ac­cord­ing to Prince.

“It was a big blow, it was a big blow. How­ev­er, we have been find­ing oth­er in­no­v­a­tive ways to sur­vive. When we were do­ing the re­fur­bish­ment we re­ceived an ad­vance pay­ment of $400,000 and we nev­er re­ceived any­thing af­ter that. The ex­tent of the re­pairs and the re­fur­bish­ment went to over $800,000,” she said.

Prince said while they have been ac­cused of mak­ing er­rors on in­voic­es in the past, the com­pa­ny has since re­brand­ed and im­proved the ser­vice it pro­vides.

She said while VM­COTT’s rev­enue streams have been dwin­dling dur­ing the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic, they man­aged to forge part­ner­ships with pri­vate and com­mer­cial en­ti­ties to re­main afloat.

X-Trails re­paired, wait­ing to be col­lect­ed

Prince said VM­COTT has about eight X-Trails for the TTPS that have been re­paired and are wait­ing to be col­lect­ed.

“I have about eight X-Trails parked up here. They have been here since 2019 and they have al­ready been re­fur­bished.”

Asked why the TTPS had not col­lect­ed the re­paired ve­hi­cles, she re­spond­ed, “I need mon­ey, my dear. You can’t col­lect the ve­hi­cles with­out pay­ing me. Re­mem­ber, I put out a lot of mon­ey. I am still ow­ing sup­pli­ers for parts that I took and I am still pay­ing sup­pli­ers as a re­sult of that.”

Asked if VM­COTT would con­tin­ue hold­ing the ve­hi­cles un­til they re­ceived pay­ment, Prince said, “I can­not say, I am hold­ing the ve­hi­cles. But we were hop­ing while the TTPS left them here...it’s un­til they get their house in or­der and they or­gan­ise the pay­ment for us, then they could have tak­en them. But we still have some oth­er stuff to be done on it too. So tak­ing it just like that doesn’t make sense.”

The ve­hi­cles in VM­COTT’s pos­ses­sion still need to be out­fit­ted with sen­sors, tyres, mir­rors, and bat­ter­ies, while the TTPS lo­go has to be paint­ed on them.

It is es­ti­mat­ed this could cost be­tween $200,000 and $300,000.

Prince said VM­COTT has been op­er­at­ing in good faith by al­low­ing the TTPS to use part of their Beetham Gar­dens com­pound to re­pair and ser­vice non-func­tion­al mo­tor­cy­cles.

The Chi­nese gov­ern­ment do­nat­ed 200 mo­tor­cy­cles to the TTPS in 2019.

Re­ceiv­ing pic­tures from so­cial me­dia users who have ques­tioned why the TTPS had dozens of ve­hi­cles rust­ing away on a hill­top near VM­COTT’s San Fer­nan­do of­fice for over four years, Prince said some of these ve­hi­cles can be ser­viced.

She said many felt the aban­doned ve­hi­cles could be re­paired and used in the fight against crime.

“Peo­ple have been tag­ging me on Face­book say­ing an­oth­er mil­lion-dol­lar tax­pay­ers’ fund­ed ve­hi­cles are rot­ting away. It could fix... but that would save mon­ey.”

Of this fleet, she es­ti­mat­ed 30 per cent could be re­paired.

How­ev­er, she stressed, “This has noth­ing to do with me. We are not the own­ers of the fleet. They are not in our in­ven­to­ry to say we need to ser­vice them. I can­not ac­count for that. I think the TTPS is tak­ing them slow­ly and sure­ly and ear­mark­ing them for mi­nor re­pairs.”

BOX

Au­di­tor-Gen­er­al: No pol­i­cy di­rec­tion for fleet man­age­ment

A 2010 spe­cial re­port pre­pared by the Au­di­tor Gen­er­al on the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty’s Man­age­ment and Main­te­nance of Ve­hi­cles in the TTPS stat­ed: “Over the years there have been nu­mer­ous com­plaints against the Trinidad and To­ba­go Po­lice Ser­vice re­gard­ing their ser­vice de­liv­ery. The lack of func­tion­ing ve­hi­cles has been cit­ed as a con­trib­u­to­ry fac­tor to this sit­u­a­tion. The po­lice ser­vice is in the midst of a trans­for­ma­tion process to ad­dress the is­sue of its ef­fec­tive­ness and to im­prove cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion.”

Dur­ing the pe­ri­od 2006 to 2008, the re­port stat­ed $86 mil­lion was spent on the ac­qui­si­tion of ve­hi­cles.

The re­port fur­ther stat­ed that de­spite gov­ern­ment in­vest­ment, the po­lice ser­vice con­tin­ues to be ham­pered by a lack of mo­bil­i­ty which man­i­fests it­self in pub­lic com­plaints about their”in­abil­i­ty to re­spond in a time­ly man­ner.”

“A key prob­lem with the man­age­ment and main­te­nance of po­lice ve­hi­cles has been the ab­sence of strate­gic plan­ning and pol­i­cy di­rec­tion at all lev­els in the fleet man­age­ment process. This im­por­tant area has been giv­en low pri­or­i­ty by the po­lice ser­vice re­sult­ing in the fail­ure to achieve val­ue for mon­ey,” the re­port stat­ed.

The re­port added that the “po­lice ser­vice did not have a com­pre­hen­sive pol­i­cy in place which gov­erned all as­pects of their fleet man­age­ment func­tions.”

It al­so out­lined that the “po­lice ser­vice ve­hi­cle ac­qui­si­tion was par­tic­u­lar­ly af­fect­ed by the lack of de­tailed pol­i­cy guide­lines. Dur­ing the years 2000 to 2008, there were many changes in per­sons as­signed to man­age the ve­hi­cle fleet. This cou­pled with the lack of pol­i­cy has re­sult­ed in a wide va­ri­ety of ve­hi­cles be­ing pur­chased for use.”

The re­port ad­vised that not all ve­hi­cle types had been ap­pro­pri­ate and suit­able to the needs of the po­lice giv­en their unique re­quire­ments.

“As a re­sult, at the time of our re­view, there were at least 24 dif­fer­ent types of ve­hi­cles in the po­lice ser­vice’s fleet.”

In 2006, the re­port re­vealed, a to­tal of 178 ve­hi­cles were bought for $25 mil­lion, 99 ve­hi­cles were pur­chased in 2007 for $16 mil­lion, while 220 ve­hi­cles were ob­tained in 2008 for $45 mil­lion.

“We found that ve­hi­cle main­te­nance costs av­er­aged $26.5 mil­lion per year over the pe­ri­od 2006 to 2008. De­spite this in­vest­ment, ap­prox­i­mate­ly half of the ve­hi­cle fleet was found to be non-op­er­a­tional dur­ing this pe­ri­od,” the re­port stat­ed.

Ques­tions sent to the TTPS:

1. What is the ex­act num­ber of ve­hi­cles owned by the TTPS? Can you pro­vide a break­down of the types of ve­hi­cles and how they have been as­signed to the var­i­ous polic­ing di­vi­sions?

2. Can you say which polic­ing di­vi­sion has been the most af­fect­ed by the lack of ve­hi­cles?

3. Can you pro­vide an ex­act fig­ure as to how many are cur­rent­ly op­er­a­tional? For those out of ser­vice, can you say how long they have been out and why?

4. In 2019, an au­dit of the TTPS’s fleet was or­dered so that the sta­tus of each ve­hi­cle could be as­sessed. Can you pro­vide an up­date on this and al­so in­di­cate what else was found dur­ing the au­dit?

The ques­tions were sub­mit­ted to the TTPS’ Cor­po­rate Com­mu­ni­ca­tions De­part­ment on De­cem­ber 10. Of­fi­cials ac­knowl­edged re­ceipt of the email and said it would have to be sent to the re­spec­tive de­part­ment to be an­swered. There was no time frame giv­en for when the an­swers will be pro­vid­ed.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored