JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, April 2, 2025

Types of criminal offences

by

20100815

There are three main types of crim­i­nal of­fences in Trinidad and To­ba­go:

1.Sum­ma­ry of­fences;

2.In­dictable of­fences; and

3.Tri­able ei­ther way of­fences.

Sum­ma­ry of­fences

Sum­ma­ry of­fences are less se­ri­ous crim­i­nal of­fences in which the penal­ties that can be im­posed are not as great as in­dictable of­fences. Sum­ma­ry of­fences make up the ma­jor­i­ty of the com­mon of­fences and in­clude of­fences like com­mon as­sault, dis­or­der­ly be­hav­iour and mi­nor crim­i­nal dam­age to prop­er­ty. Sum­ma­ry of­fences are usu­al­ly con­tained in the Sum­ma­ry Of­fences Act Chap 11:02. Sum­ma­ry of­fences are pre­ced­ed with sum­mar­i­ly, that is, tried in the Mag­is­trates Court by the mag­is­trate. Peo­ple charged with sum­ma­ry of­fences can­not be tried by ju­ries even if they would pre­fer it. Sec­tion 33 of the Sum­ma­ry Courts Act Chap 4:20 pro­vides that sum­ma­ry of­fences are com­menced by way of a com­plaint.

A com­plaint al­leges that the per­son named has com­mit­ted some spe­cif­ic of­fence. The com­plaint must spec­i­fy the name of the of­fence and suf­fi­cient par­tic­u­lars. The par­tic­u­lars will usu­al­ly in­clude the date and place of the al­leged of­fence as well as the act com­plained of in suc­cinct terms. If the of­fence is cre­at­ed by statute, a ref­er­ence is usu­al­ly in­clud­ed. Sec­tion 33(2) of the Sum­ma­ry Courts Act spec­i­fies a time lim­it of six months for lay­ing a com­plaint for a sum­ma­ry of­fence ex­cept where the leg­is­la­tion pro­vides oth­er­wise, eg re­cov­ery of a civ­il debt where the time lim­it is four years.

In­dictable of­fence

In­dictable of­fences are the most se­ri­ous cat­e­go­ry of crim­i­nal of­fence. It in­cludes of­fences such as mur­der, wound­ing with in­tent and ar­son. There are two stages in in­dictable tri­als. First­ly, a pre­lim­i­nary in­ves­ti­ga­tion known as a pre­lim­i­nary en­quiry or com­mit­tal pro­ceed­ings in the Mag­is­trates Court be­fore a mag­is­trate must be con­duct­ed. The pur­pose of the en­quiry is so that the Mag­is­trate can de­ter­mine if the Pros­e­cu­tion can es­tab­lish a pri­ma fa­cie case against the ac­cused–in oth­er words, if there is a suf­fi­cient case made out against the ac­cused to jus­ti­fy a tri­al by ju­ry.

In­dictable of­fences are al­so com­menced by com­plaint but some­times called in­for­ma­tion in the Mag­is­trates Court. The pro­ce­dure for the pre­lim­i­nary en­quiry is con­tained in the In­dictable Of­fences (Pre­lim­i­nary En­quiry) Act Chap 12:01. At the pre­lim­i­nary in­quiry stage per­sons against whom an in­dictable of­fence is laid are not called up­on to plead, that is, they do not en­ter a plea. At this stage the pros­e­cu­tion is to pro­duce all the ev­i­dence that is to be led at tri­al at the end of the en­quiry the mag­is­trate can ei­ther dis­charge the ac­cused per­son or com­mit him for tri­al.

Af­ter the pre­lim­i­nary en­quiry if the DPP wish­es to pro­ceed with the in­dictable charge, he must cause an in­dict­ment to be filed in the High Court which ini­ti­ates pro­ceed­ings in the High Court. The in­dict­ment may con­tain one or more counts/charge. This is the sec­ond stage–tri­al by ju­ry be­fore a judge in the High Court. At the High Court the ac­cused would be ar­raigned, a plea is tak­en, if a plea of not guilty is en­tered a ju­ry would be se­lect­ed and em­pan­elled and a tri­al would pro­ceed.

Tri­able ei­ther way of­fences

Of­fences tri­able ei­ther way are of­fences stip­u­lat­ed by statute that may be tried ei­ther as an in­dictable of­fence or a sum­ma­ry of­fence. These in­clude of­fences of ma­li­cious dam­age, lar­ce­ny and as­sault oc­ca­sion­ing ac­tu­al bod­i­ly harm. Once the of­fence is one that is list­ed in the sec­ond sched­ule of the Sum­ma­ry Courts Act ei­ther the pros­e­cu­tor or the de­fence may make rep­re­sen­ta­tions to the court as to why the of­fence is more suit­able for sum­ma­ry tri­al. Be­fore a mag­is­trate can hear an of­fence list­ed in the sched­ule sum­mar­i­ly the con­sent of the de­fen­dant must be ob­tained. If con­sent is giv­en the Mag­is­trate would pro­ceed with the case as a sum­ma­ry of­fence.

The de­fen­dant may be per­mit­ted by the mag­is­trate to with­draw his con­sent and pro­ceed with the case as a pre­lim­i­nary en­quiry. There are al­so of­fences which specif­i­cal­ly state that the of­fence can be pro­ceed­ed sum­mar­i­ly or in­dictable and the pros­e­cu­tion would de­ter­mine which way to pro­ceed. The mag­is­trate al­so has the pow­er af­ter hear­ing the ini­tial facts of a tri­able ei­ther way of­fence, to switch the case to an in­dictable of­fence rather than pro­ceed sum­mar­i­ly (for ex­am­ple, where it ap­pears to be a se­ri­ous case). The mag­is­trate al­so has the pow­er to switch from com­mit­tal pro­ceed­ings to sum­ma­ry tri­al of an of­fence of a sim­i­lar kind un­less the DPP di­rects oth­er­wise.

This ar­ti­cle sets out gen­er­al guide­lines; all le­gal rules have ex­cep­tions and vari­a­tions. How the law ap­plies to you de­pends on the facts of your case. As­sis­tance for this ar­ti­cle ob­tained from In­tel­lec­tu­al Prop­er­ty Of­fice


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored