Senior Reporter
akash.samaroo@cnc3.co.tt
The United National Congress (UNC) says if returned to office, it will seek to distribute 500 homes per week, as it called Prime Minister Stuart Young’s proposed housing policy an out-of-touch fantasy.
Speaking in Point Fortin on Tuesday night, Prime Minister Young said if returned to office his government will deliver a substantial housing programme for young people, involving the distribution of 3,000 lots for home construction.
The Prime Minister added that the initiative involves developing state lands and providing the necessary infrastructure, including electricity, water connections, and house plans for young people. Eligibility would be limited to first-time owners, who could purchase the lots and build their own homes in line with these plans.
But in response yesterday, UNC deputy leader and former Housing Development Corporation (HDC) managing director, Jearlean John, told Guardian Media, “He said they are going to develop 3,000 lots? Now I don’t know in the ten years they have been there, that they’ve built 3,000 houses. If they are going to develop 3,000 lots, the HDC database at this time is hovering around 160,000 applicants, and that is even after they cleaned up the database. So, you have 160,000 people sitting down in that database hoping the government can help them, but he is talking about 3,000 lots. How is that impacting the housing crisis we are now facing?”
The PM said the mortgage for the first-time homeowners would be based on a value ranging between $1 million and $1.5 million.
On this aspect, John claimed Young showed he was unaware of the country’s socio-economic realities.
“I don’t know which circus he hangs out in, but I don’t know if there are many young people who can afford that mortgage. The last time I looked at a house in the private sector, a house for $1.275 million was attracting a rate of interest of 4.5 per cent to five per cent over a 30–35-year period, that is a long period, and the monthly payment was $6,500.”
John added, “Again, if he is looking at the HDC database, that database would tell him that the majority of the people on that database earns $5,000 to $8,000 per month. So he is starting wrong and what he is doing is showing us how out of touch he is with mainstream Trinidad and Tobago.”
Asked about the UNC’s housing policy, particularly for the country’s youth, John explained, “The UNC alternatively is saying that someone now coming out of school or training, they are going to put a portion of their salaries in a home ownership fund because we must do that to help people help themselves. We are going to provide direct financial support to a first-time homeownership grant covering a portion of the downpayment, so you are going straight to the heart of the matter.”
John added, “So you put a little piece of your money, it is interest bearing, the government will match it so it will be a circular pool of funding and we are looking to build at least 10,000 houses per year.”
The UNC deputy leader said because the UNC had “perfected” the model between 2010-2015, “I am sure we can get into 500 houses per week and climbing.”
Meanwhile, speaking at yesterday’s UNC media briefing, another UNC deputy leader, David Lee, said Young’s promises sound suspiciously like his party’s policies.
“We have something in our manifesto on that (housing), I don’t want to elaborate too much, I will leave that to the leader to roll that out but we do have a policy in respect to that and maybe Mr Young got a copy of our policy before time because some of the things he is talking about now, the election gimmicks, even the demerit points system that they’re re-looking at, it’s something that Mrs Persad-Bissessar had called about in Parliament. She had called about reviewing that whole demerit points system, so it is curious that Mr Young is coming at the 99th hour with these election gimmicks and I am saying in closing in 10 years they couldn’t fix it, and they won’t in two weeks.”
Guardian Media sought to get the views of the National Transformation Alliance (NTA) and the Patriotic Front (PF)but their political leaders did not respond to our messages and calls.