JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, May 18, 2025

When to have the booster jab if you have recently had COVID-19

by

1201 days ago
20220202
An illustration of a person walking up a flight of stairs, with the last three steps being a COVID-19 vaccine bottle each, shown next to a large syringe. [Jawahir Al-Naimi/Al Jazeera]

An illustration of a person walking up a flight of stairs, with the last three steps being a COVID-19 vaccine bottle each, shown next to a large syringe. [Jawahir Al-Naimi/Al Jazeera]

Doc­tor’s Note with Dr Amir Khan | AL JAZEERA

 

● Get­ting a boost­er shot af­ter you re­cov­er from a COVID-19 in­fec­tion pro­vides added pro­tec­tion to your im­mune sys­tem ●

 

(AL JAZEERA) — Rates of the Omi­cron vari­ant re­main high. How­ev­er, it has been shown that boost­ers do of­fer a good de­gree of pro­tec­tion against Omi­cron. So, many who have had a re­cent in­fec­tion are won­der­ing how long they should wait be­fore get­ting the boost­er.

Ac­cord­ing to the UK’s Na­tion­al Health Ser­vice, peo­ple should wait 28 days af­ter test­ing pos­i­tive for COVID-19 be­fore get­ting their boost­er shots. This is to en­sure that the symp­toms of the in­fec­tion are not con­fused with any po­ten­tial side ef­fects from the vac­cines.

The Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion (CDC) in the US sug­gests wait­ing un­til you have ful­ly re­cov­ered from any symp­toms and your iso­la­tion pe­ri­od has end­ed af­ter get­ting COVID-19 be­fore book­ing a boost­er shot.

Ev­i­dence shows that get­ting a vac­cine af­ter you re­cov­er from a COVID-19 in­fec­tion pro­vides added pro­tec­tion to your im­mune sys­tem. So, it is cer­tain­ly worth get­ting the boost­er shot even though you may have re­cov­ered from COVID-19 re­cent­ly.

 

What the ris­ing cost of liv­ing may mean for your health

An illustration showing a mother standing next to her daughter who is sitting at a small table in the middle of a room, with coins piled in front of them, as they work out how to pay the bills. [Muaz Kory/Al Jazeera]

An illustration showing a mother standing next to her daughter who is sitting at a small table in the middle of a room, with coins piled in front of them, as they work out how to pay the bills. [Muaz Kory/Al Jazeera]

One of the things the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic has high­light­ed is how glob­al ad­ver­si­ties tend to hit the most vul­ner­a­ble in so­ci­ety the hard­est. We saw that those who were so­cial­ly dis­ad­van­taged, had jobs that meant they were un­able to work from home and who lived in over­crowd­ed hous­es caught COVID-19 at high­er rates than those who were more af­flu­ent. As we move to a stage of the pan­dem­ic where – in wealth­i­er coun­tries – vac­cines and med­i­cines can now of­fer a lay­er of pro­tec­tion against se­ri­ous ill­ness, poor­er peo­ple are now be­ing hit by an­oth­er cri­sis: the ris­ing cost of liv­ing.

There are many rea­sons why the cost of liv­ing is ris­ing glob­al­ly. First­ly, whole­sale prices of oil and gas have risen to a sev­en-year high, main­ly be­cause of in­creased de­mand in Asia and a cold win­ter in Eu­rope that de­plet­ed gas re­serves. Sec­ond­ly, dur­ing the height of the pan­dem­ic, many man­u­fac­tur­ing fac­to­ries had to close, so there is now a short­age of goods de­spite no shift in de­mand, dri­ving up prices of com­mon house­hold items and build­ing sup­plies. Ship­ping costs have al­so gone up to meet the de­mand to have goods de­liv­ered to re­tail­ers, but it is the con­sumers who end up bear­ing these costs. At the same time, pub­lic bor­row­ing in­creased dur­ing the pan­dem­ic, and many coun­tries have al­so seen a rise in tax­a­tion and in­fla­tion ris­es on many goods.

Mean­while, wages have not in­creased and much of the fi­nan­cial sup­port gov­ern­ments were pro­vid­ing to their cit­i­zens has now end­ed. This has left those on low­er in­comes strug­gling to heat their homes, pro­vide food for their fam­i­lies and even hav­ing to lim­it es­sen­tial trips out in cars due to fu­el costs. All of this is bound to have ad­verse ef­fects on the phys­i­cal and men­tal health of these com­mu­ni­ties.

With en­er­gy prices go­ing up, fu­el pover­ty is on the rise with fam­i­lies on low in­comes forced to ra­tion the amount of en­er­gy they use, lead­ing to cold­er homes. When peo­ple live in cold homes, their blood ves­sels con­strict to stop heat from be­ing lost as blood moves around the body. This nar­row­ing of blood ves­sels caus­es an in­crease in blood pres­sure. One study demon­strat­ed that a one-de­gree-Cel­sius low­er­ing of room tem­per­a­ture raised blood pres­sure by 1.3mmHg. For some old­er peo­ple, this can lead to dan­ger­ous­ly high blood pres­sure. Sus­tained raised blood pres­sure can lead to an in­creased risk of heart at­tacks and strokes, some­thing that has been linked to cold­er homes.

Cold, damp homes al­so in­crease the risk of res­pi­ra­to­ry con­di­tions such as pneu­mo­nia, bron­chi­tis and asth­ma ex­ac­er­ba­tions, re­sult­ing in more con­sul­ta­tions with GPs and hos­pi­tal ad­mis­sions.

Cold­er homes have al­so been as­so­ci­at­ed with a quadru­ple in­crease in men­tal health ill­ness­es, in­clud­ing anx­i­ety and de­pres­sion. Peo­ple who lived in an in­door tem­per­a­ture of 21C (70F) or above were 50 per­cent less like­ly to suf­fer from anx­i­ety and de­pres­sion com­pared with those who lived in an in­door tem­per­a­ture of 15C (59F) or be­low.

Chil­dren from poor­er back­grounds al­so have worse health out­comes when com­pared with those from wealthy back­grounds and the ris­ing cost of liv­ing is on­ly set to make this worse. Ba­bies born in­to the poor­est fam­i­lies are on av­er­age 200g lighter than those born in­to rich­er fam­i­lies. They are al­so more like­ly to:

- die with­in the first year of be­ing born

- suf­fer from men­tal health is­sues

- do worse in meet­ing ed­u­ca­tion­al achieve­ments

The rates of mal­nu­tri­tion, obe­si­ty and Type 2 di­a­betes are al­so high­er in chil­dren from the poor­est fam­i­lies in West­ern na­tions. Chil­dren grow­ing up in over­crowd­ed hous­es with poor ac­cess to out­door spaces are more like­ly to be killed in road traf­fic ac­ci­dents, fires, ac­ci­den­tal drown­ings and ac­ci­den­tal poi­son­ings. And as more fam­i­lies are pushed in­to pover­ty with ris­ing liv­ing costs, there is a wor­ry we may see more of these in­ci­dents.

The so­lu­tions to these is­sues are not straight­for­ward, but the first step must be to recog­nise the se­ri­ous health im­pli­ca­tions that the ris­ing cost of liv­ing is go­ing to have on so many fam­i­lies. Gov­ern­ments need to look at how to pro­tect the most vul­ner­a­ble in their so­ci­eties by shield­ing them from tax ris­es and of­fer­ing fi­nan­cial sup­port schemes for those who need them most. We must not let the gulf be­tween the rich and poor that has been ex­ac­er­bat­ed by the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic widen fur­ther as times get hard­er for so many.

 

Read­er’s Ques­tion: What are the fac­tors that in­crease the risk of get­ting long COVID?

An illustration of a person riding a bicycle which has the COVID virus as its wheels, through a long rocky terrain. [Muaz Kory/Al Jazeera]

An illustration of a person riding a bicycle which has the COVID virus as its wheels, through a long rocky terrain. [Muaz Kory/Al Jazeera]

 

Long COVID refers to con­tin­u­ing symp­toms that can last weeks and months af­ter a SARS-CoV-2 in­fec­tion. It can af­fect even those who have mild symp­toms in the acute phase. The rea­son why some peo­ple de­vel­op long COVID and oth­ers don’t is a ques­tion that has re­mained large­ly unan­swered, but a group of sci­en­tists be­lieve they have iden­ti­fied four fac­tors that in­crease the risk of an in­di­vid­ual suf­fer­ing from long COVID.

The study fol­lowed 209 peo­ple who test­ed pos­i­tive for COVID-19 and took blood sam­ples and nasal swabs at reg­u­lar in­ter­vals at two and three months look­ing for bi­o­log­i­cal mark­ers that could pre­dis­pose an in­di­vid­ual to long COVID.

The first fac­tor they iden­ti­fied was the lev­el of vi­ral ge­net­ic ma­te­r­i­al in the blood short­ly af­ter in­fec­tion – of­ten re­ferred to as the “vi­ral load”. The high­er the vi­ral load, the more like­ly the peo­ple be­ing stud­ied were to suf­fer from long COVID. High vi­ral loads of­ten hap­pen when peo­ple are ex­posed to high lev­els of the SARS-CoV-2 virus over a sus­tained pe­ri­od of time. This can oc­cur in a high-risk health­care set­ting or in poor­ly ven­ti­lat­ed in­door spaces where in­fect­ed peo­ple are con­tin­u­ous­ly breath­ing out the virus, it then lingers in the air and oth­ers can eas­i­ly breathe it in.

The sec­ond fac­tor was the pres­ence of au­toan­ti­bod­ies. These are dif­fer­ent to an­ti­bod­ies that are used to fight off in­fec­tion. Au­toan­ti­bod­ies are im­mune cell pro­teins that usu­al­ly oc­cur when the im­mune sys­tem has over­re­act­ed to a threat and does not “switch off” even af­ter the threat has been cleared. These au­toan­ti­bod­ies may then start at­tack­ing healthy tis­sue and cells. Au­toan­ti­bod­ies play a role in dis­eases such as rheuma­toid arthri­tis and lu­pus. The study found the high­er the lev­el of au­toan­ti­bod­ies in an in­di­vid­ual, the high­er their risk is of de­vel­op­ing long COVID.

The pres­ence of the Ep­stein Barr virus (EBV) was the third fac­tor. EBV is a com­mon virus that caus­es mononu­cle­o­sis or glan­du­lar fever, a throat in­fec­tion usu­al­ly found in younger peo­ple. Af­ter in­fec­tion, the virus is known to lie dor­mant in cells for many years. It can be­come re­ac­ti­vat­ed when a per­son is bi­o­log­i­cal­ly stressed, such as with a COVID-19 in­fec­tion. The re­searchers were quick to point out that the study does not def­i­nite­ly con­nect the two virus­es, but they found high­er lev­els of EBV in the blood of those who de­vel­oped long COVID.

The fourth fac­tor is the link be­tween Type 2 di­a­betes and long COVID. The re­searchers found a sig­nif­i­cant as­so­ci­a­tion be­tween the two. It’s pos­si­ble that Type 2 di­a­betes al­ters the im­mune re­sponse to the virus, there­by in­creas­ing the risk of long COVID. High lev­els of in­sulin, which can oc­cur in Type 2 di­a­betes pa­tients, can cause low-lev­el in­flam­ma­tion in the body and put the im­mune sys­tem on high alert which may in­crease the risk of an over­re­ac­tion to SARS-CoV-2 and con­tin­u­ing symp­toms af­ter the virus has cleared. The re­searchers said there may be oth­er pre-ex­ist­ing con­di­tions that may al­so in­crease the risk of long COVID that were not suf­fi­cient­ly present in their study co­hort.

The study, al­though of a small co­hort, helps high­light the risk fac­tors for long COVID. It is im­por­tant to un­der­stand the con­di­tion to help sup­port those who have con­tin­u­ing symp­toms. It can al­so help us come up with treat­ment op­tions and mea­sures that may re­duce the in­ci­dence of the ill­ness in the first place.

COVID-19Health


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored