JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Realise potential of water-taxi service

by

20130117

Claim­ing that the wa­ter-taxi ser­vice, launched in De­cem­ber 2008, is un­eco­nom­ic, the au­thor­i­ties have al­ready scaled back on sail­ings be­tween Port-of-Spain and San Fer­nan­do and dropped plans to ex­pand it to Point Fortin and La Brea.

Yet, no al­ter­na­tive has been of­fered for the thou­sands of com­muters who face the dai­ly frus­tra­tion of get­ting from one point to an­oth­er on the se­vere­ly con­gest­ed high­ways and road­ways.

It is the re­spon­si­bil­i­ty of the Gov­ern­ment, how­ev­er, to pro­vide af­ford­able and ef­fi­cient pub­lic trans­port. This ob­jec­tive, which has elud­ed suc­ces­sive T&T ad­min­is­tra­tions, does not ap­pear to be a pri­or­i­ty for the cur­rent regime–which is edg­ing to­ward shut­ting down, rather than im­prov­ing on the wa­ter-taxi ser­vice, one of few such fa­cil­i­ties cur­rent­ly avail­able.

While the fo­cus has been on high­way ex­pan­sion, it is doubt­ful whether that will re­lieve the chron­ic pub­lic trans­porta­tion woes. In any case, any so­lu­tions that op­tion of­fers are still some years off.

In ad­di­tion, the bus ser­vice op­er­at­ed by the Pub­lic Trans­port Ser­vice Cor­po­ra­tion (PTSC), while it has im­proved in re­cent years, of­fers no es­cape from the dai­ly traf­fic.

The wa­ter taxi, on the oth­er hand, does just that, and, eco­nom­ic ar­gu­ments aside, has great po­ten­tial for suc­cess.

The wa­ter-taxi ser­vice pro­vides an al­ter­na­tive mode of trans­port which, if prop­er­ly mar­ket­ed to at­tract more pas­sen­gers, can ease traf­fic con­ges­tion along the north-south route and even east-west, if it were ex­pand­ed to Diego Mar­tin, as once pro­posed.

How­ev­er, lit­tle has been done, in all the time that the ser­vice has op­er­at­ed, to pro­mote or im­prove on it. In late 2010, the Gov­ern­ment, con­tin­u­ing with arrange­ments put in place by its pre­de­ces­sors, in­tro­duced a fleet of four new high-speed cata­ma­rans to re­place the sec­ond-hand ves­sels that had been op­er­at­ing since the ser­vice be­gan. At that time, Jack Warn­er, then Min­is­ter of Works and Trans­port, spoke about ex­pan­sion of the ser­vice to Point Fortin.

Since then, how­ev­er, all the talk has been about huge fi­nan­cial loss­es, of­fered as jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for the re­duced sail­ings al­ready im­ple­ment­ed. This may well be lead­ing to a to­tal shut­down.

Cur­rent Min­is­ter of Trans­port Chan­dresh Shar­ma has in­di­cat­ed that the ser­vice is heav­i­ly sub­sidised and trans­ports few­er than 1,500 pas­sen­gers dai­ly be­tween Port-of-Spain and San Fer­nan­do. He said it costs $50 mil­lion an­nu­al­ly to op­er­ate the wa­ter taxis, while the ser­vice brings in just $7 mil­lion in rev­enue.

How much rev­enue does a high­way bring in?More­over, those fig­ures do not present an ac­cu­rate pic­ture of the ac­tu­al ben­e­fits of the wa­ter taxi. Hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars would be saved an­nu­al­ly if work­ers are able to get to their places of em­ploy­ment in time, with­out en­dur­ing con­sid­er­able stress en route due to miles of traf­fic grid­lock.

The sav­ings in man-hours alone would yield con­sid­er­able eco­nom­ic and so­cial ben­e­fits–facts ap­par­ent­ly not con­sid­ered by the min­is­ter.

The val­ue of the ser­vices must be con­sid­ered not just in dol­lars and cents, but in terms of stress-free trav­el, on-time ar­rivals, greater pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and both present and long-term en­vi­ron­men­tal ad­van­tages.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored