JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, February 15, 2025

CAL rubbishes Roodal’s claim T&T passengers screened at US airport

by

Dareece Polo
17 days ago
20250129

Caribbean Air­lines Lim­it­ed (CAL) has de­nied claims made by Oropouche East MP Dr Roodal Mooni­lal that 80 per cent of pas­sen­gers on a flight were sub­ject­ed to sec­ondary screen­ing at the Or­lan­do In­ter­na­tion­al Air­port on Mon­day.

Dr Mooni­lal made the claim at the Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress’ Mon­day Night Re­port, in­sin­u­at­ing that the screen­ing was the re­sult of an al­leged strained re­la­tion­ship be­tween the T&T Gov­ern­ment and US pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump’s regime, due to T&T’s ties to the Venezuela gov­ern­ment.

Mooni­lal al­leged that every eight out of ten pas­sen­gers on flight BW482 were “placed in spe­cial jack­ets they had to put on. They were ush­ered, cart­ed away to a se­cu­ri­ty room where they were sub­ject­ed to a much more ag­gres­sive pat down. Their lug­gage was searched again and some al­so had to un­der­take what is called swab­bing of elec­tron­ic de­vices for ex­plo­sive residue.”

How­ev­er, in a state­ment re­leased yes­ter­day, CAL re­ject­ed the claim, say­ing it was un­sub­stan­ti­at­ed.

“The air­line can con­firm, fol­low­ing thor­ough checks with its se­nior per­son­nel in Or­lan­do, that no such screen­ing ex­er­cise with re­spect to Caribbean Air­lines pas­sen­gers was con­duct­ed,” CAL said.

“Fur­ther­more, the air­line has re­ceived no no­ti­fi­ca­tion or ad­vi­so­ry from US au­thor­i­ties in­di­cat­ing that such an ex­er­cise was con­duct­ed or is be­ing con­tem­plat­ed.”

Guardian Me­dia al­so found that sev­er­al in­ter­na­tion­al flights were ar­riv­ing at the same air­port around the same time, rais­ing doubts about the tar­get of the so-called sec­ondary screen­ing.

While BW482 land­ed at 12 pm, NK3643 from Can­cun, Mex­i­co, land­ed at 12.12 pm, and AV28 from Bo­go­ta, Colom­bia, land­ed at 12.15 pm.

Al­so asked about the claim yes­ter­day, For­eign Af­fairs Min­is­ter Dr Amery Browne de­clined to com­ment on what he re­ferred to as Mooni­lal’s “un­found­ed spec­u­la­tions.” How­ev­er, he lat­er shared CAL’s post to his Face­book page with the cap­tion: “This de­bunks the most re­cent false­hoods be­ing spread by UNC of­fi­cials. There is an on­go­ing and vi­cious agen­da of fake news un­der­way, which is specif­i­cal­ly de­signed to max­imise neg­a­tiv­i­ty and ex­ploit the fears held by some peo­ple.”

Mean­while, speak­ing with Guardian Me­dia out­side Par­lia­ment yes­ter­day, Tourism Min­is­ter Ran­dall Mitchell al­so firm­ly re­ject­ed the claim, call­ing it a lie.

“Noth­ing is fur­ther from the truth. Per­sons are al­ways sub­ject to screen­ing. Per­sons in Trinidad and To­ba­go are al­so sub­ject to screen­ing. So, I be­lieve it’s just fear­mon­ger­ing on the part of Mem­ber Mooni­lal and on the part of the UNC. It’s elec­tion sea­son, it’s sil­ly sea­son, and Mem­ber Mooni­lal is sim­ply be­ing sil­ly.”

When con­tact­ed yes­ter­day morn­ing and asked for fur­ther de­tails about pas­sen­gers who al­leged­ly un­der­went the sec­ondary screen­ing, in­clud­ing con­tact num­bers for fur­ther ver­i­fi­ca­tion, Mooni­lal said, “Pas­sen­gers will not want to speak on in­ter­ac­tion with US au­thor­i­ties.”

Con­tact­ed af­ter CAL’s state­ment, how­ev­er, Mooni­lal said, “This is a TSA (Trans­porta­tion Se­cu­ri­ty Ad­min­is­tra­tion) mat­ter not a CAL mat­ter. I cast no as­pi­ra­tions on CAL, or it is not an in­dict­ment on CAL. CAL can­not be aware of the US TSA poli­cies and prac­tices. The role of CAL is to drop and pick up pas­sen­gers.”

Guardian Me­dia reached out to both the US Em­bassy and Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter Fitzger­ald Hinds for fur­ther clar­i­fi­ca­tion but re­ceived no re­spons­es up to press time.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored